The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 135, No 5, 628-634.
© 2004 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELIPERI, S.
Right arrow Articles by PAPATHANASIOU, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DELIPERI, S.
Right arrow Articles by PAPATHANASIOU, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives

COSMETIC & RESTORATIVE CARE

Clinical evaluation of a combined in-office and take-home bleaching system



SIMONE DELIPERI, D.D.S., DAVID N. BARDWELL, D.M.D., M.S. and AIKATERINI PAPATHANASIOU, D.D.S.

Background. Tooth whitening is one of the fastest growing areas in cosmetic and restorative dentistry. An increasing number of patients are demanding faster ways to bleach their teeth. Therefore, clinicians are being pushed to seek quicker and easier means to bleach their patients’ teeth, while maintaining safety in bleaching procedures.

Methods. The authors included in the clinical trial 10 subjects 18 years of age or older, each of whom had six caries-free maxillary anterior teeth without restorations on the labial surfaces and no tooth sensitivity. For each subject, one-half of the maxillary arch received a 35 percent hydrogen peroxide (Group 1) gel application for 30 minutes, and the other one-half of the maxillary arch received a 38 percent hydrogen peroxide (Group 2) gel application for 30 minutes. The in-office bleaching treatment was maintained and reinforced using a 10 percent carbamide peroxide at-home bleaching agent for 60 minutes. Subjects repeated both the in-office and take-home bleaching treatments for three consecutive days.

Results. The shade change was 8.5 for Group 1 and 9 for Group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = .3434). An average shade rebound of two shades was recorded at seven days for both treatment systems. No sensitivity was reported during or after the bleaching treatment.

Conclusions. When combined with 10 percent carbamide peroxide at-home applications, use of the Group 1 and Group 2 bleaching materials resulted in significant tooth lightening.

Clinical Implications. By using the clinical technique presented, clinicians can reduce the time required to complete tooth-whitening treatment. Using the correct tray design and improved chemical formulations of tooth whiteners may reduce gingival and tooth sensitivity, thus increasing safety.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
L. Y. Tay, C. Kose, A. D. Loguercio, and A. Reis
Assessing the Effect of a Desensitizing Agent Used Before In-office Tooth Bleaching
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2009; 140(10): 1245 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2004 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.