The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 135, No 5, 646-652.
© 2004 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TEIXEIRA, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by TROPE, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TEIXEIRA, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by TROPE, M.

ADVANCES IN DENTAL PRODUCTS

Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material



FABRICIO B. TEIXEIRA, D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., ERICA C. N. TEIXEIRA, D.D.S., M.Sc., JEFFREY Y. THOMPSON, B.S., Ph.D. and MARTIN TROPE, D.D.S., D.M.D.

Background. The authors evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth filled with either gutta-percha or a new resin-based obturation material.

Methods. The authors prepared and randomly divided 80 single-canal extracted teeth into five groups: lateral and vertical condensation with gutta-percha, lateral and vertical condensation with the new resin-based obturation material, and a control group with no filling material. The specimens were stored in 100 percent humidity for two weeks, mounted in polyester resin and loaded to failure.

Results. The authors found statistically significant differences among the experimental groups (P < .05). The groups with the new material displayed higher mean fracture loads and the gutta-percha groups lower mean fracture load values than the control unfilled group. However, the differences were not significant. The groups with the new material displayed significantly higher mean fracture loads than gutta-percha groups independent of the filling technique used.

Conclusions. Filling the canals with the new resin-based obturation material increased the in vitro resistance to fracture of endodontically treated single-canal extracted teeth when compared with standard gutta-percha techniques.

Clinical Implications. If other properties of the new resin-based obturation material compare favorably with those of gutta-percha for filling the root canal, it should be considered as a replacement for gutta-percha, as the results of this study indicate that it could provide enhanced resistance to tooth fracture.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. Ring, P. E. Murray, K. N. Namerow, B. I. Moldauer, and F. Garcia-Godoy
Removing Root Canal Obturation Materials: A Comparison of Rotary File Systems and Re-treatment Agents
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2009; 140(6): 680 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2004 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.