HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 135, No 6, 747-753. © 2004 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SUTHERLAND, S. E. Articles by MATTHEWS, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by SUTHERLAND, S. E. Articles by MATTHEWS, D. C. Related Collections Practice Management

Lessons learned

Background. High-quality systematic reviews are the basis of valid, reliable clinical practice guidelines, or CPGs. In 1999, a Canadian collaboration of dentists embarked on the process of developing guidelines.

Methods. The Canadian Collaboration on Clinical Practice Guidelines in Dentistry, or CCCD, is a coalition of multiple stakeholders from organized dentistry and academia whose mandate is to develop CPGs for practicing dentists. In the development of the first CPG based on a systematic review of the literature, the CCCD Methodology Resource Group (of which the authors were co-chairs) gained some valuable insights. The authors wrote this article to share their experiences and lessons learned and to offer practical advice to others who may undertake similar projects.

Results. The authors identify a number of methodological issues and logistical problems and make suggestions for effective management of the review and guideline development processes.

Conclusions and Practice Implications. Systematic reviews and the development of CPGs require rigorous methodology, as well as input from content experts and clinicians, to ensure validity and relevance. The processes are costly and time-intensive, but the anticipated outcome is enhanced clinical decision making and improved oral health.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Major, S. Warren, and C. Flores-Mir Survey of Systematic Review Authors in Dentistry: Challenges in Methodology and Reporting J Dent Educ., April 1, 2009; 73(4): 471 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Major, P. W. Major, and C. Flores-Mir An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English. J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2006; 137(9): 1252 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]