The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 136, No 12, 1688-1693.
© 2005 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARINI, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by PITT, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARINI, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by PITT, W. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental Equipment/Instruments

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

Removal of oral biofilms by bubbles

The effect of bubble impingement angle and sonic waves



MICHAEL R. PARINI, M.S. and WILLIAM G. PITT, Ph.D.

Background. Previous research showed that the collision of bubbles with biofilm could remove biofilm from a surface. However, the effectiveness of biofilm removal by bubbles and sonic waves had not been determined.

Methods. The authors mounted Streptococcus mutans biofilms in a chamber containing artificial saliva and exposed them to bubbles and sonic waves. They generated sonic waves via an oscillator at the frequencies and acoustic intensities of sonic toothbrushes. They also mounted biofilms at different angles to measure the effect of a bubble’s impingement angle.

Results. The presence of sound had no significant effect on the amount of biofilm removed (F = 0.51). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of biofilm removed with respect to the angle at which bubbles impinged on the biofilm (F = 0.65). The authors performed analysis of variance tests to determine whether the difference in the amount of biofilm removal was significant (F < 0.05) in the presence or absence of sound and at the different angles tested.

Conclusions. The collision of a bubble at any angle between 5 and 45 degrees was equally effective in removing biofilm. The addition of sound to a bubble stream at the tested intensities had a negligible effect.

Clinical Implications. Bubbles produced by dental instruments are effective in removing biofilm from the surface of the teeth, regardless of the angle at which the bubble impinges on the biofilm.

Key Words: Streptococcus mutans; biofilm; bubbles; sonic vibration; toothbrush







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2005 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.