The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 136, No 6, 766-773.
© 2005 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EL-MOWAFY, O.
Right arrow Articles by RAJWANI, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EL-MOWAFY, O.
Right arrow Articles by RAJWANI, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging

CLINICAL PRACTICE

Intensity of quartz-tungsten-halogen light-curing units used in private practice in Toronto



OMAR EL-MOWAFY, B.D.S., Ph.D., F.A.D.M., WAFA EL-BADRAWY, B.D.S., M.Sc., DONALD W. LEWIS, D.D.S., D.D.P.H., M.Sc.D., F.R.C..D(C), BABAK SHOKATI, D.D.S., JAFFER KERMALLI, OSAMA SOLIMAN, AVIDES ENCIOIU, REMA ZAWI and FATMA RAJWANI

Background. The authors conducted a study to determine light intensity and heat/glare measurements of quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) light polymerization units used in dental offices.

Methods. Research assistants visited 100 dental offices and assessed 214 QTH light units. They recorded each unit’s model, age, service history, light intensity and heat/glare emissions.

Results. Mean light intensity was 526 milliwatts per square centimeter (120–1,000 mW/cm2), with 26 units having intensity less than 300 mW/cm2. The mean light unit age was 5.6 years. Light units older than three years had significantly lower output intensities than those that were one, two or three years old. The authors found a wide range of heat/glare measurements (3–300 mW/cm2), with 4.6 percent of the units having values greater than 50 mW/cm2, including three with values of more than 200 mW/cm2. The mean light intensity of units serviced in the preceding year was 539 mW/cm2; it was 418 mW/cm2 for units serviced from one to six years previously.

Conclusions. Light intensity and heat/glare values varied among the 214 units; some units had values well outside the recommended levels. Each unit’s age and service history significantly affected its intensity. An awareness campaign is needed to promote testing, repair or replacement of light polymerization units. Periodic testing of light polymerization units should be considered by regulatory bodies to ensure optimum quality of composite restorations.

Clinical Implications. Light polymerization units in some private dental offices in Toronto had intensities that may result in composites restorations with inferior properties. Dentists need to regularly monitor the intensity of the light polymerization units and maintain the units to ensure quality composite restorations.

Key Words: Intensity; quartz-tungsten-halogen light units; resin-based composite







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2005 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.