The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 136, No 7, 885-892.
© 2005 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARTE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by CHARLTON, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HARTE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by CHARLTON, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infection Control

COVER STORY

Characteristics of infection control programs in U.S. Air Force dental clinics

A survey



JENNIFER A. HARTE, D.D.S., M.S. and DAVID G. CHARLTON, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Background. National organizations and regulatory agencies have issued a number of guidelines on proper infection control procedures in dentistry. The objective of the authors’ research was to gather information about current infection control practices in U.S. Air Force (USAF) Dental Corps clinics for the purpose of updating previously issued guidelines and developing infection control training programs.

Methods. The authors mailed a 60-item self-administered survey to the commanders of all USAF dental clinics located in the United States and overseas (n = 82). The survey used primarily fixed-response questions to gather information about aspects of the clinics’ infection control programs. The authors obtained descriptive statistics of the returned data by means of a statistical software package.

Results. The results indicated a high degree of compliance with existing USAF dental infection control guidelines. All clinics had personnel assigned to manage their programs, had a written exposure control plan and took measures to improve dental unit water quality. Facilities used a number of approaches to achieve and monitor compliance and exhibited a considerable amount of variation in infection control procedures when specific guidelines did not exist.

Conclusions. In general, USAF dental clinics reported high levels of compliance with current infection control policies and procedures. Recurrent training, continual oversight, a highly motivated staff and teamwork are essential for reaching and maintaining these levels.

Clinical Implications. Although compliance with recommended infection control guidelines is challenging, the results of this survey indicate that compliance is achievable, even in large group practices.

Key Words: Dental infection control practices; compliance; prevention







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2005 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.