The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 137, No 3, 339-347.
© 2006 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatchel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gatchel, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, E., III
Related Collections
Right arrow Endodontics

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

Efficacy of an early intervention for patients with acute temporomandibular disorder–related pain

A one-year outcome study



Robert J. Gatchel, PhD, Anna Wright Stowell, PhD, Lynn Wildenstein, MA, Richard Riggs, DDS and Edward Ellis III, DDS, MS

Background. The authors conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a biopsychosocial intervention for patients who were at high risk (HR) of progressing from acute to chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD)–related pain.

Methods. The authors classified subjects’ risk using a predictive algorithm and randomized them into an early-intervention (EI) or a nonintervention (NI) group. The EI included cognitive behavioral skills training and biofeedback. The authors assessed pain and psychosocial measures at intake and at a one-year follow-up. Subjects’ self-reported pain levels were measured on an analog scale and as a response to palpation.

Results. At one year, EI-group subjects had significantly lower levels of self-reported pain and depression. At one year, more NI-group subjects than EI-group subjects had utilized health care for jaw-related pain. NI-group subjects were 12.5 times as likely to have a somatoform disorder, more than seven times as likely to have an anxiety disorder, and 2.7 times more likely to have an affective disorder at one year, compared with EI-group subjects.

Conclusions. EI-group subjects had reduced pain levels, improved coping abilities and reduced emotional distress at one year.

Clinical Implications. The TMD-related pain experience is complex and requires early identification with a biopsychosocial EI to achieve maximal, sustainable results.

Key Words: Biopsychosocial; temporomandibular disorder; pain; early intervention







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2006 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.