The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 10, 1360-1365.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herd, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ofner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herd, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ofner, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental Equipment/Instruments

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

The in vivo contamination of air-driven low-speed handpieces with prophylaxis angles



Sarah Herd, DDS, MSD, Judith Chin, DDS, MS, Charles John Palenik, MS, MBA, PhD and Susan Ofner, MS

Background. The authors conducted an in vivo study to determine if low-speed handpiece motors can become contaminated with oral flora when used with prophylaxis angles.

Methods. This crossover study involved 20 subjects, two types of handpieces and three prophylaxis angles. The authors used each handpiece/prophylaxis angle system to polish teeth. They then collected samples, spiral-plated the specimens and incubated them at 37°C anaerobically and aerobically (with 5 percent carbon dioxide). After incubation, the authors examined the plates for the presence of bacterial colonies.

Results. At least 75 percent of the handpiece/prophylaxis angle systems used on the 20 subjects had bacterial contamination for at least one cultured area. Of the 420 specimens, 258 (61.4 percent) produced bacterial growth. Contamination varied from zero to 6,300 colony-forming units per milliliter.

Conclusions. These data suggest that the internal surfaces of low-speed handpieces can become microbially contaminated during use with prophylaxis angles.

Clinical Implications. Unless low-speed handpieces are sterilized properly after each use, they pose a risk for crossinfection.

Key Words: Infection control; handpiece; prophylaxis angle; contamination; sterilization

Abbreviations: ETSA: Enriched trypticase soy agar • PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2007 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.