The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 2, 169-178.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infection Control

COVER STORY

JADA Continuing Education

Preventing percutaneous injuries among dental health care personnel



Jennifer L. Cleveland, DDS, MPH, Laurie K. Barker, MSPH, Eve J. Cuny, MS, RDA, Adelisa L. Panlilio, MD, MPH; AND the National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) Group

Background. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that health care personnel (HCP) adopt safer work practices and consider using medical devices with safety features. This article describes the circumstances of percutaneous injuries among a sample of hospital-based dental HCP and estimates the preventability of a subset of these injuries: needlesticks.

Methods. The authors analyzed percutaneous injuries reported by dental HCP in the CDC’s National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) from December 1995 through August 2004 to describe the circumstances.

Results. Of 360 percutaneous injuries, 36 percent were reported by dentists, 34 percent by oral surgeons, 22 percent by dental assistants, and 4 percent each by hygienists and students. Almost 25 percent involved anesthetic syringe needles. Of 87 needlestick injuries, 53 percent occurred after needle use and during activities in which a safety feature could have been activated (such as during passing and handling) or a safer work practice used.

Conclusions. NaSH data show that needlestick injuries still occur and that a majority occur at a point in the workflow at which safety syringes—in addition to safe work practices and recapping systems—could contribute to injury prevention.

Clinical Implications. All dental practices should have a comprehensive written program for preventing needlestick injuries that describes procedures for identifying, screening and, when appropriate, adopting safety devices; mechanisms for reporting and providing medical follow-up for percutaneous injuries; and a system for training staff members in safe work practices and the proper use of safety devices.

Key Words: Dentistry; occupational exposure; safety devices; blood-borne pathogens; infection control

Abbreviations: CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration • HCP: Health care personnel • HCV: Hepatitis C virus • NaSH: National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers • NSHN: National Safety Healthcare Network • OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
R. R. Sibbitt, D. J. Palmer, and W. L. Sibbitt Jr
Integration of Patient Safety Technologies Into Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 446 - 455.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2007 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.