The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 7, 985-991.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental Equipment/Instruments

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

The influence of dental unit waterline cleaners on composite-to-dentin bond strengths



André V. Ritter, DDS, MS, Eduardo Ghaname, DDS, MS and Ralph H. Leonard, DDS, MPH

Background. One approach to controlling dental unit waterline (DUWL) contamination by microorganisms is the addition of chemical cleaners to the treatment water. Yet, there is concern that these cleaners might affect the bonding of resin-based composites to enamel and dentin. The authors evaluated the influence of DUWL cleaners on composite-to-dentin bond strengths.

Methods. The authors tested the strength of resin-based composite bonded to dentin in specimens treated with distilled water (control) or one of four cleaners. They tested a total-etch adhesive, a self-etching primer/adhesive and an experimental self-etching primer/adhesive. The authors stored the specimens for 24 hours at 37 C and tested them to determine their bond strengths.

Results. The mean shear bond strengths (SBSs) varied according to the cleaner and adhesive used, ranging from 14.7 to 21.9 megapascals. However, the authors found no statistically significant differences and/or interactions between mean SBSs of specimens treated with the various DUWL cleaners and adhesives (P ≥ .05).

Conclusions. The tested DUWL cleaners did not significantly influence composite-to-dentin bond strengths for the total-etch adhesive and self-etching primer/adhesives used in this study.

Clinical Implications. The conclusions imply that bonding of resin-based composites to dentin is not affected by the cleaners tested when they are used to treat DUWL contamination.

Key Words: Dental unit waterline contamination; dental unit treatment water; dentin bonding

Abbreviations: DUWL: Dental unit waterline • NaClO: Sodium hypochlorite • SBS: Shear bond strength







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2007 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.