The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 2, 163-169.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalothorn, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Modesitt, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalothorn, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Modesitt, S. C.

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

Hypodontia as a risk marker for epithelial ovarian cancer

A case-controlled study



Leigh A. Chalothorn, DMD, MS, Cynthia S. Beeman, DDS, PhD, Jeffrey L. Ebersole, PhD, G. Thomas Kluemper, DMD, MS, E. Preston Hicks, DDS, MS, MSD, Richard J. Kryscio, PhD, Christopher P. DeSimone, MD and Susan C. Modesitt, MD

Background. Genetic mutations that result in hypodontia also may be associated with abnormalities in other parts of the body. The authors conducted a study to establish the prevalence rates of hypodontia among subjects with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and control subjects to explore possible genetic associations between these two phenotypes.

Methods. The authors recruited 50 subjects with EOC and 100 control subjects who did not have EOC. The authors performed a dental examination on each subject to detect hypodontia, and they reviewed pertinent radiographs and dental histories. They also recorded any family history of cancer and hypodontia.

Results. The prevalence of hypodontia was 20 percent for EOC subjects and 3 percent for control subjects. The difference between these two hypodontia rates was significant. This difference implied that women with EOC are 8.1 times more likely to have hypodontia than are women without EOC. The severity of hypodontia was similar between the two groups, with one to two teeth being affected. Maxillary lateral incisors followed by second premolars were the most frequently affected teeth.

Conclusion. The preliminary data suggest a statistical association between hypodontia of the permanent dentition and EOC.

Clinical Implications. Genetic analysis of the genes of interest is necessary to explore similarities between hypodontia and EOC further. An association could allow hypodontia to serve as a potential risk marker for EOC.

Key Words: Ovarian cancer; DNA; hypodontia; genetics; tooth

Abbreviations: AXIN2: Axis inhibition protein 2. • BARX1: BARX homeobox 1. • BARX2: BARX homeo-box 2. • BRCA1: Breast cancer 1. • BRCA2: Breast cancer 2. • EOC: Epithelial ovarian cancer. • MSX1: Msh home-obox 1. • PAX9: Paired box 9. • p53: p53 tumor suppressor. • Wnt: Wingless type.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.