HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oong, E. M. Articles by Caufield, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oong, E. M. Articles by Caufield, P. W. Related Collections Restoratives

JADA Continuing Education

A Review of the Evidence

Background. Concern about inadvertently sealing over caries often prevents dentists from providing dental sealants. The objective of the authors’ review was to examine the effects of sealants on bacteria levels within caries lesions under dental sealants.

Methods. The authors searched electronic databases for comparative studies examining bacteria levels in sealed permanent teeth. To measure the effect of sealants on bacteria levels, they used the log₁₀ reduction in mean total viable bacteria counts (VBC) between sealed and not-sealed caries and the percentage reduction in the proportion of samples with viable bacteria.

Results. Six studies—three randomized controlled trials, two controlled trials and one before-and-after study—were included in the analysis. Although studies varied considerably, there were no findings of significant increases in bacteria under sealants. Sealing caries was associated with a 100-fold reduction in mean total VBC (four studies, 138 samples). Sealants reduced the probability of viable bacteria by about 50.0 percent (four studies, 117 samples).

Conclusions. The authors found that sealants reduced bacteria in carious lesions, but that in some studies, low levels of bacteria persisted. These findings do not support reported concerns about poorer outcomes associated with inadvertently sealing caries.

Clinical Implications. Practitioners should not be reluctant to provide sealants—an intervention proven to be highly effective in preventing caries—because of concerns about inadvertently sealing over caries.

Key Words: Pit-and-fissure sealants; caries; bacteria

Abbreviations: CFU: Colony-forming unit. • DEJ: Dentinoenamel junction. • GIC: Glass-ionomer cement. • RBS: Resin-based sealant. • RCT: Randomized controlled trial. • VBC: Viable bacteria count.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. F. Gooch, S. O. Griffin, S. K. Gray, W. G. Kohn, R. G. Rozier, M. Siegal, M. Fontana, D. Brunson, N. Carter, D. K. Curtis, et al. Preventing Dental Caries Through School-Based Sealant Programs: Updated Recommendations and Reviews of Evidence J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2009; 140(11): 1356 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Zero, M. Fontana, E. A. Martinez-Mier, A. Ferreira-Zandona, M. Ando, C. Gonzalez-Cabezas, and S. Bayne The Biology, Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Dental Caries: Scientific Advances in the United States J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2009; 140(suppl_1): 25S - 34S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Response from the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2008; 139(6): 662 - 664. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Beauchamp, P. W. Caufield, J. J. Crall, K. Donly, R. Feigal, B. Gooch, A. Ismail, W. Kohn, M. Siegal, and R. Simonsen Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations for the Use of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants: A Report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2008; 139(3): 257 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]