The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 3, 317-324.
© 2008 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lahmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doering, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lahmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doering, S.

RESEARCH

Brief Relaxation Versus Music Distraction in the Treatment of Dental Anxiety

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial



Claas Lahmann, MD, Rainer Schoen, DMD, Peter Henningsen, MD, Joram Ronel, MD, Moritz Muehlbacher, MD, Thomas Loew, MD, Karin Tritt, PhD, Marius Nickel, MD and Stephan Doering, MD

Background. Dental anxiety is a significant cause of poor dental health. Because patients often prefer nonpharmacological interventions, the clinical effectiveness of clearly structured approaches is of particular interest.

Methods. This prospective randomized controlled study compares a brief relaxation method (BR) with music distraction (MD) and with a control group (C). The authors randomly assigned 90 patients with dental anxiety to BR, MD or C groups. They assessed the outcomes by means of the state anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Results. Both BR and MD reduced dental anxiety significantly. In contrast, patients in the C group did not exhibit a significant change in their anxiety level. BR was significantly superior to MD. Stratification according to the patient’s general level of dental anxiety revealed that BR also was particularly effective in highly anxious subjects, whereas MD did not have a clinically relevant effect on these subjects.

Conclusions. BR appears to be a safe, economically sound and effective nonpharmacological approach to the short-term reduction of dental anxiety. Additional investigations are needed to validate these findings in a larger clinical trial and to determine the long-term effects of this intervention.

Clinical Implications. Relaxation techniques are a pragmatic, effective and cost-saving method of facilitating dental treatment in anxious patients.

Key Words: Dental anxiety; complementary medicine; randomized controlled clinical trials

Abbreviations: BR: Brief relaxation. • C: Control. • DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition. • HAQ: Hierarchical Anxiety Questionnaire. • MD: Music distraction. • STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. • STAI-S: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State. • STAI-T: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PsychosomaticsHome page
C. Lahmann, T. H. Loew, K. Tritt, and M. Nickel
Efficacy of Functional Relaxation and Patient Education in the Treatment of Somatoform Heart Disorders: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation
Psychosomatics, September 1, 2008; 49(5): 378 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.