The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 5, 565-570.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mjör, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mjör, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, H. M.

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

Caries and Restoration Prevention



Ivar A. Mjör, BDS, MSD, MS, Dr. odont., Dorthe Holst, Cand. odont., Dr. odont., MPH and Harald M. Eriksen, Cand. odont., Dr. odont.

Background. The authors analyzed studies of decayed, missing and filled (DMF) rates for surfaces and teeth in Norway published during the last 30 years. The result of active fluoride therapy combined with a change in criteria for when to place restorations led to a marked reduction in the need for restorations.

Methods. The authors reviewed independent, cross-sectional DMF studies of representative samples of young adults performed every 10 years during the period 1973 through 2006. The clinicians involved in the studies used standardized and calibrated methods. The authors of this article also reviewed an additional series of studies collecting DMF data from representative samples of 15-year-old adolescents that also had been carried out independently from 1979 through 1996. In these studies, the investigators examined clinical records and bitewing radiographs with attention to progression of carious lesions and restorative treatments.

Results. The authors noted a marked reduction in the mean decayed, missing and filled surface (DMFS) scores from 1973 through 2006 in the two adult groups. They also found a significant decrease in treatment of caries. The reduction was most marked after the mid-1990s. They noted that the most dramatic change in the data from the 15-year-olds resulted from a change in the treatment criteria during the 1980s. Approximal lesions in enamel were monitored by the investigators of those studies in combination with the use of fluoride toothpaste.

Conclusion and Clinical Implications. A caries treatment approach based on active caries-preventive treatment and restrictive criteria for restoration placement are good bases for reducing the need for restorations as shown in cross-sectional studies reviewed.

Key Words: Restorative dentistry; operative; general practice; research; review literature

Abbreviations: DMF: Decayed, missing and filled. • DMFS: Decayed, missing and filled surfaces. • DMFT: Decayed, missing and filled teeth. • WHO: World Health Organization.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
I. A. Mjor
Controlled Clinical Trials and Practice-based Research in Dentistry
Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2008; 87(7): 605 - 605.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.