The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 8, 1095-1104.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

RESEARCH

Reversal of Soft-Tissue Local Anesthesia With Phentolamine Mesylate in Pediatric Patients



Mary Tavares, DMD, MPH, J. Max Goodson, DDS, PhD, Deborah Studen-Pavlovich, DMD, John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD, Laura A. Navalta, BA, Siegfried Rogy, PhD, Bruce Rutherford, DDS, PhD, Sharon Gordon, DDS, MPH, PhD, Athena S. Papas, DMD, PhD; AND Soft Tissue Anesthesia Reversal Group

Background. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of a formulation of phentolamine mesylate (PM) as a local anesthesia reversal agent for pediatric patients.

Methods. A total of 152 pediatric subjects received injections of local anesthetic with 2 percent lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine before undergoing dental procedures. The authors then randomized subjects to receive a PM injection or a control injection (sham injection in which a needle does not penetrate the tissue) in the same sites as the local anesthetic was administered in a 1:1 cartridge ratio after the procedure was completed. Over a two- to-four-hour period, they measured the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia and evaluated vital signs, pain and adverse events.

Results. The median recovery time to normal lip sensation was 60 minutes for the subjects in the PM group versus 135 minutes for subjects in the control group. The authors noted no differences in adverse events, pain, analgesic use or vital signs, and no subjects failed to complete the study.

Conclusions. PM was well-tolerated and safe in children 4 to 11 years of age, and it accelerated the reversal of soft-tissue local anesthesia after a dental procedure in children 6 to 11 years of age.

Clinical Implications. PM can help dental clinicians shorten the post-treatment duration of soft-tissue anesthesia and can reduce the number of posttreatment lip and tongue injuries in children.

Key Words: Local anesthetics; dental care for children; drugs; injections; pain measurement; pediatric dentistry; randomized controlled clinical trials

Abbreviations: AEs: Adverse events • FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration • IM: Intramuscularly • IRB: Institutional review board • IV: Intravenously • OCA: Oral cavity assessment • PI: Principal investigator • PM: Phentolamine mesylate • STA: Soft-tissue anesthesia • W-B PRS: Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale • WHO: World Health Organization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
E. V. Hersh, P. A. Moore, A. S. Papas, J. M. Goodson, L. A. Navalta, S. Rogy, B. Rutherford, J. A. Yagiela, and the Soft Tissue Anesthesia Recovery Group
Reversal of Soft-Tissue Local Anesthesia With Phentolamine Mesylate in Adolescents and Adults
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2008; 139(8): 1080 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.