The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 140, No 3, 346-353.
© 2009 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Formicola, A.
Right arrow Articles by Treadwell, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Formicola, A.
Right arrow Articles by Treadwell, H.

TRENDS

The Dental Pipeline Program’s Impact on Access Disparities and Student Diversity



Allan Formicola, DDS, MS, Howard Bailit, DMD, PhD, Kim D’Abreu, MPH, Judith Stavisky, MPH, MEd, Ignatius Bau, JD, George Zamora, MPA and Henrie Treadwell, PhD

Background. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, N.J., the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Mich., and The California Endowment, Los Angeles, collaborated in funding a five-year (2002–2007) national demonstration program (Pipeline, Profession & Practice: Community-Based Dental Education [Dental Pipeline]) to reduce dental care access disparities. Fifteen dental schools were selected to participate in the Dental Pipeline program. The goals were to have senior students spend more time in community sites providing care to underserved patients; to prepare students to treat diverse, low-income patients; and to increase enrollment of underrepresented minority (URM) students.

Methods. A national program office at Columbia University in New York City administered the Dental Pipeline program. The participating dental schools developed networks of community clinics and practices for student rotations, established courses in cultural competency and public health and implemented new programs to recruit URM students.

Results. The average time senior students spent in community clinics and practices increased from 10 to 50 days; all schools developed courses in cultural competency and public health; and enrollment of UMR students increased 54.4 percent (excluding two of the schools) versus 16 percent in non–Dental Pipeline schools.

Conclusions. On average, the participating dental schools were successful in meeting program goals.

Abbreviations: Dental Pipeline: Pipeline, Profession & Practice: Community-Based Dental Education. • Kellogg: The W.K. Kellogg Foundation. • NPO: National program office. • RWJF: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. • TCE: The California Endowment. • URM: Underrepresented minority.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
M. Mofidi and A. Gambrell
Community-Based Dental Partnerships: Improving Access to Dental Care for Persons Living with HIV/AIDS
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2009; 73(11): 1247 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
L. E. Itaya, P. Glassman, S. Gregorczyk, and H. L. Bailit
Dental School Patients with Limited English Proficiency: The California Experience
J Dent Educ., September 1, 2009; 73(9): 1055 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2009 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.