The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 140, No 5, 559-566.
© 2009 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hosaka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hosaka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

Flumazenil Reversal of Sublingual Triazolam

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial



Kazuo Hosaka, DDS, PhD, Douglass Jackson, DMD, MS, PhD, Jacqueline E. Pickrell, PhD, Masahiro Heima, DDS, PhD and Peter Milgrom, DDS

Background. Incremental sublingual (SL) dosing of triazolam has emerged as a popular sedation technique. Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated the technique’s safety or efficacy. Given its popularity, an easily administered rescue strategy is needed.

Methods. The authors conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate how intraoral submucosal flumazenil (0.2 milligram) attenuates central nervous system depression produced by incremental SL dosing of triazolam (three doses of 0.25 mg across 90 minutes) in 14 adults. The authors assessed outcomes by using the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, bispectral index (BIS) and physiological monitoring.

Results. The OAA/S and BIS scores increased after the flumazenil injection at the 30-minute observation point, but they were not sustained. Six hours after the initial dose of triazolam had been administered (four hours after the flumazenil or placebo challenge), all patients could be discharged from the dental clinic.

Conclusions. Deep sedation from incremental SL dosing of triazolam is incompletely reversed by a single intraoral injection of flumazenil. The reversal did not persist. The authors discharged the patients from the dental clinic at 360 minutes.

Clinical Implications. A single intraoral injection of flumazenil (0.2 mg) cannot immediately reverse oversedation with triazolam. A higher dose might be effective. Reversal for the purpose of discharging the patient early is neither appropriate nor safe.

Key Words: Flumazenil; triazolam; sublingual sedation; behavior/drug effects; dental anxiety; drug therapy; conscious sedation; patient safety

Abbreviations: BIS: Bispectral index. • BMI: Body mass index. • BP: Blood pressure. • CNS: Central nervous system. • DOCS: Dental Organization for Conscious Sedation. • FDA: Food and Drug Administration. • IND: Investigational new drug. • IV: Intravenous. • OAA/S: Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation. • SL: Sublingual. • SM: Submucosal.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2009 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.