The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 95, No 2, 319-321.
© 1977 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Komensky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Komensky, A.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 95, Issue 2, 319-321
Copyright © 1977 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Patients of record



AM Komensky

Although the case of Smith vs Jones helped settle some of the problems in defining patients of record, it did not address itself to all the situations in which a definition of patients of record would be needed. The question of which dentist should have the records of certain patients will present difficulty as long as two or more dentists continue to practice without a formal agreement that addresses this question. And the rights of partners, associates or employees should be determined in writing in the partnership agreement, employment contract, or bylaws of corporate practice before the association is established.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1977 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.