The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 97, No 4, 628-632.
© 1978 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertolotti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertolotti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, V
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 97, Issue 4, 628-632
Copyright © 1978 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Inhibition of corrosion during autoclave sterilization of carbon steel dental instruments



RL Bertolotti and V Hurst

Comparisons were made of several dip-applied corrosion inhibitors for protection of carbon steel dental instruments during autoclaving. Although none were totally effective, several provided significant corrosion inhibition. Sodium nitrite and one proprietary inhibitor were about equally effective and notably superior to the other inhibitors investigated. Because sodium nitrite is a food preservative that is relatively harmless when ingested in small quantities, whereas commercial inhibitors are of proprietary composition and unspecified toxicity, we prefer to use sodium nitrite for corrosion inhibition during autoclaving. Sodium nitritie is readily available from chemical suppliers and is generally much less expensive than most commercial inhibitors. Although the autoclave used in this investigation is typical of many used in clinical situations, minor variations in design, steam impurities, and other unknown factors might effect the results. Further research is needed to determine the corrosive effects of impurities in the steam supply, residual detergents, method of postautoclave drying, steam supply deoxygenation, pH, and possibly the use of oxygen scavengers within the autoclave.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1978 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.