The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 98, No 3, 384-389.
© 1979 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voss, J.
Right arrow Articles by Charbeneau, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voss, J.
Right arrow Articles by Charbeneau, G.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 98, Issue 3, 384-389
Copyright © 1979 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

A scanning electron microscope comparison of three methods of bonding resin to enamel rod ends and longitudinally cut enamel



JE Voss and GT Charbeneau

Taglike projections of resin into the etched enamel surface and longitudinally cut enamel were studied under the SEM. Three methods of bonding, including the use of a bonding agent and a primer, were compared. Freshly extracted teeth were pumiced, rinsed, and dried. The enamel surface was etched for a minute with phosphoric acid. Adaptic with bonding agent, Simulate with primer, and Simulate without primer were then applied to the etched enamel. After the teeth were sectioned, the enamel was etched with phosphoric acid and viewed under the SEM. The resin projections into the etched rod ends at the enamel surface were 5 to 10 mu in length, with similar cuplike and coneline patterns of tags for the three methods of bonding. Troughlike and ridgelike projections into the longitudinally cut enamel were 3 to 5 mu in length; patterns of tags were similar for the three bonding methods. No observable differences in length and pattern of tags were noticed among the three bonding methods.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1979 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.