|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 3, 331-335.
© 2000 American Dental Association |
CLINICAL PRACTICE |
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. The study group consisted of 39 patients who were scheduled to undergo dental extractions. All patients were receiving 100 milligrams of aspirin daily on a regular basis. The authors randomly divided the patients into two groups: those who stopped the aspirin therapy before the procedure and those who continued the aspirin therapy. One hour before the procedures, all patients underwent a bleeding time test. In addition, the amount of bleeding during the procedure was measured.
Results. The mean (± standard deviation) bleeding time was 1.8 ± 0.47 minutes for patients who stopped aspirin therapy one week before the procedure. For patients who continued aspirin therapy, the bleeding time was 3.1 ± 0.65 minutes. The difference was statistically significant (P = .004). However, both groups were within the normal bleeding time range, and in both groups, a local hemostatic method was sufficient to control bleeding. No episodes of uncontrolled intraoperative or postoperative bleeding were noted.
Conclusion. Low-dose aspirin therapy should not be stopped before oral surgery. Local hemostasis is sufficient to control bleeding.
Clinical Implications. Patients receiving aspirin therapy to prevent blood clot formation may be subject to emboli formation if the treatment is stopped. The results of this study show that aspirin therapy should be continued throughout oral surgical procedures. Local measures are sufficient to control any bleeding during surgery.
Because of the risk of uncontrolled intraoperative or postoperative bleeding, patients receiving long-term aspirin therapy have been asked to discontinue use of the drug for seven to 10 days before surgery.13 However, no double-blind controlled studies support this practice, particularly for oral surgery. Because continuous low-dose aspirin regimens have become popular in the last decade for treating cardiovascular and peripheral vascular diseases,4,5 patients are reluctant to stop their regular therapy before undergoing surgical procedures. Moreover, interruption of aspirin therapy may expose these patients to the risk of developing thromboembolism, myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident.6
We initiated this study to measure the effect of low-dose aspirin therapy on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing oral surgery. In addition, we compared the relationship between clinical hemorrhagic complications and the tested bleeding time.
We randomly divided the patients into an experimental group (19 patients) and a control group (20 patients). Patients in the experimental group continued to receive aspirin therapy, while patients in the control group stopped aspirin therapy seven days before their extraction and did not resume treatment until the day after the surgical procedure. As shown in Table 1
![]()
PATIENTS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
PATIENTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
The study group was composed of 39 patients with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 62 ± 13.2 years and an age range of 39 to 89 years. The group included 15 women (mean age, 64 ± 13.2 years) and 24 men (mean age, 60 ± 13.1 years) who were scheduled to undergo dental extractions. All patients were receiving 100 milligrams of aspirin per day on a long-term basis as a secondary preventive drug for cardiovascular or peripheral vascular diseases.
, patients in both groups were similar in regard to the indications for aspirin therapy. Anemic patients (that is, those with hemoglobin counts of less than 100 grams per liter) and patients receiving sodium warfarin therapy or other anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Helsinki Committee and informed consent was obtained from all patients.
|
The patient groups did not differ in the complexity of the operative procedures, and the severity of intraoperative hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups.
One of us (B.B.) performed a bleeding time test in the Hematology Outpatient Clinic, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, one hour before patients underwent their surgical procedures. The technique, described elsewhere,7 included making three vertical incisions on the forearm skin with venostasis of 40 millimeters of mercury.
The surgical procedures were divided into three categories:
Before the procedure, all patients received a local anesthetic (3 percent mepivacaine).
Intraoperative bleeding was measured by subtracting the volume of irrigation fluid from the volume of blood accumulated in the suction trap. Blood loss of less than 20 milliliters was considered mild; between 20 and 50 mL, moderate; and more than 50 mL, severe.
We used Pearsons
2 test to evaluate the relative frequencies of patients in different groups. Differences of parametric variables were tested with analysis of variance.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 2
shows the types of surgical procedures and the occurrence of severe intraoperative bleeding. The patient groups did not differ in the complexity of the operative procedures, and the severity of intra-operative hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the numbers of patients with mild, moderate or severe intraoperative bleeding, as depicted in the figure
, differed significantly between the two groups (P < .05). In both groups, more intraoperative bleeding was encountered when extractions were complicated.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies conducted since the early 1980s have shown that the antiplatelet effect is elicited at low dosesof about 0.5 to 1.0 mg per kilogram per daywhile the analgesic and antipyretic effects occur only at a daily dosage of 5 to 10 mg/kg, and the anti-inflammatory effect is achieved at a dosage of more than 30 mg/kg/day.9 Thus, low doses of aspirin are sufficient for achieving anticoagulation with reduced side effects. Therefore, within the last decade we have seen a rapid increase in the use of low-dose aspirin as a secondary preventive drug by patients who have cardiovascular and peripheral vascular diseases.10 The increasing popularity of aspirin, either alone or in combination with other drugs, has presented physicians and dentists with the dilemma of whether to advise patients to discontinue aspirin therapy before surgical procedures are performed.
Controversy exists in the literature regarding this issue. Many studies11,12 have advocated stopping aspirin therapy seven to 10 days before elective surgery.1 Conversely, other researchers have suggested that aspirin therapy should be continued regardless of the surgical procedure.13,14
Lawrence and colleagues14 recommended the continuation of aspirin therapy before elective dermatologic surgery if the patients bleeding time was within normal limits. They found that bleeding time was prolonged in six (37.5 percent) of 16 patients receiving aspirin therapy; however, all of these patients had been receiving high doses of aspirin. The results of our study showed that when patients received a low dose of aspirin (100 mg), their bleeding time remained, without exception, within normal limits.
On the other hand, Scher2 advocated stopping aspirin therapy before any surgical procedure performed on a non-emergency basis. He found that diffuse postoperative bleeding was associated with preoperative use of aspirin. However, the patients in his study were also receiving a high dose of aspirin.
Thomason and colleagues15 described a patient receiving low-dose aspirin therapy whose platelet function was completely impaired, and required infusion of platelets to control hemorrhage after gingivectomy. These authors suggested that the rarity of such cases points to a considerable variability in the individual platelet response to the drug.
Our study demonstrated that dental extractions, even the more complex procedures, did not result in uncontrolled intra-operative or postoperative hemorrhage in patients receiving low-dose aspirin therapy on a long-term basis. No radical steps were needed to stop the bleeding in these patients, and in most cases suturing was the only hemostatic tool used. Furthermore, the results of all of the patients bleeding time teststhe only reliable test for the activity of platelets7,16were within the normal range, regardless of whether patients continued or discontinued aspirin therapy. Thus, it seems that there is no need to stop low-dose aspirin therapy in most patients, perhaps even in patients with anemia. Although we observed no complications in patients in whom aspirin therapy was temporarily stopped, such discontinuation may induce thrombogenesis.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Napenas, C. H.L. Hong, M. T. Brennan, S. L. Furney, P. C. Fox, and P. B. Lockhart The Frequency of Bleeding Complications After Invasive Dental Treatment in Patients Receiving Single and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2009; 140(6): 690 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cohen Expanding the Recognition and Assessment of Bleeding Events Associated With Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary Care Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2009; 84(2): 149 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.T. Brennan, M.A. Valerin, J.L. Noll, J.J. Napenas, M.L. Kent, P.C. Fox, H.C. Sasser, and P.B. Lockhart Aspirin Use and Post-operative Bleeding from Dental Extractions Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2008; 87(8): 740 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Douketis, P. B. Berger, A. S. Dunn, A. K. Jaffer, A. C. Spyropoulos, R. C. Becker, and J. Ansell The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 299S - 339S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Linnebur, S. L. Ellis, and J. D. Astroth Educational Practices Regarding Anticoagulation and Dental Procedures in U.S. Dental Schools J Dent Educ., February 1, 2007; 71(2): 296 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Friedlander, J. Weinreb, I. Friedlander, and J. A. Yagiela Metabolic syndrome: Pathogenesis, medical care and dental implications J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2007; 138(2): 179 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. K. H. Wiegand, D. LeJeune, F. Boguschewski, H. Bonnemeier, F. Eberhardt, H. Schunkert, and F. Bode Pocket Hematoma After Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Surgery: Influence of Patient Morbidity, Operation Strategy, and Perioperative Antiplatelet/Anticoagulation Therapy Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1177 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. JESKE and G. D. SUCHKO Lack of a scientific basis for routine discontinuation of oral anticoagulation therapy before dental treatment J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2003; 134(11): 1492 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |