|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 4, 493-495.
© 2000 American Dental Association | ![]() |
CLINICAL PRACTICE |
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Case Description. A 29-year-old woman was referred to a dental clinic for treatment of a large internal resorptive defect in the coronal and middle one-third of the maxillary left central incisor root with no apparent periapical pathosis, as well as a large periapical radioluency at the apex of the maxillary left lateral incisor that was associated with a necrotic pulp. The authors used a dual-cure syringable composite resin in conjunction with a bonding agent within the defect to treat it.
Clinical Implications. This technique seals the dentinal tubules and strengthens the remaining tooth structure. It also improves the outcome of resorptive defects and reduces operators chair time.
Restoring pathological defects that are caused by internal resorption in teeth can be challenging. The introduction of new restorative materials has improved the outcome of these defects, as well as reduced chair time for operators.
Although the etiology of internal resorption is unknown, trauma or persistent chronic pulpitis often are contributing factors.1 Several researchers describe internal resorption and believe that the resulting defects are due to inflammation.27 Fothergill8 describes internal resorption as a "pink spots." Mummery9 describes and discusses these "pink spots" in detail. In 1998, the American Association of Endodontics10 defined internal resorption as "a pathologic process initiated within the pulp space with loss of dentin." Trope and colleagues11 describe internal resorption as an oval-shaped enlargement of the root canal space. It usually is asymptomatic and detectable by routine radiographs. Root canal therapy is the only effective treatment and should begin as soon as possible to limit progression.
In this article, we describe a clinical procedure that uses a dentin-bonding agent in conjunction with a dual-cure syringeable hybrid composite resin to manage teeth that have undergone internal resorption.
![]()
CASE REPORT
TOP
ABSTRACT
CASE REPORT
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
A 29-year-old woman was referred to the Howard University College of Dentistry dental clinic by another dental office for treatment. We took radiographs, which revealed a large internal resorptive defect in the coronal and middle one-third of the maxillary left central incisor (tooth no. 9) root with no apparent periapical pathosis, as well as a large periapical radiolucent area at the apex of the maxillary left lateral incisor that was associated with a necrotic pulp (Figure 1
). We made a diagnosis of extensive internal resorption secondary to trauma.
|
Since the clinical crown was intact, we decided not to place a post core and porcelain crown. Instead, we used a dentin bonding system and a dual-cure syringable hybrid composite resin.
To prepare the canal for composite resin, we placed a rubber dam to isolate the tooth. We irrigated the canal with water, dried it with air and paper points, placed an etching gel containing 37 percent phosphoric acid in it with a syringe for 20 seconds and irrigated it with water. The canal was dried of all excess moisture using paper points and an air syringe.
We selected the Tenure AB (Den-Mat Corp.) dentin-bonding system and applied the composite resin to the defect according to the manufacturers directions. The canal and orifice were gently air dried for 10 seconds after each application of the adhesive. We applied the Tenure S Bond Enhancer (Den-Mat Corp.) to the entire length of the unfilled root canal and orifice and then gently air-dried it. To prevent accumulation of the bond enhancer in the canal, we did not light-cure the enhancer.
We mixed together equal amounts of the dual-cure syringeable composite resin, Marathon (Den-Mat), shade paste and initiator for about 30 seconds, placed the mixture in a tip with plunger and slowly injected it into the resorptive defect from the apex to the occlusal surface to avoid void formation within the canal. We cured the composite resin with a light source that transmitted light facially and lingually on the tooth for 40 seconds in each direction until polymerization occurred. We then filled the remaining canal space and coronal access of the tooth with composite resin in two increments and cured it (Figure 2
). The lingual surface of the tooth was finished with an ultrafine diamond bur and a composite finishing kit.
|
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used Tenure AB and Marathon because they are easy to insert, and because of their their autopolymerization properties and ability to help prevent pathological fractures that can occur with the separation of the crown and root at the defect level.
The clinician has several alternative procedures and materials from which to choose for the final restoration.
Using this technique prevented voids within the canal space. Although Marathon is a dual-cure material, we used a visible light-curing unit after the orifice was completely filled to maximize polymerization. Composite resin used in conjunction with Tenure is a stronger material than composite resin alone and adds strength and reinforcement to the tooth.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |