The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 4, 523-524.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging

CLINICAL DIRECTIONS

POSTOPERATIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH IMPLANT PROSTHESES



RUSS WILLIAMSON, D.M.D.

Patients must be continually reminded of the critical necessity of regular postoperative care for conventional fixed prosthodontics and especially for implant-supported fixed prosthodontics. However, the surgeon and prosthodontist must share in the responsibility of monitoring the patient’s condition.

CASE DESCRIPTION
A patient with a history of night grinding and clenching had recently completed extensive fixed prosthodontic treatment (Figure 1Go). An occlusal guard (Figure 2Go) was constructed to protect the conventional and implant-fixed prosthodontics from nocturnal parafunctional habits and associated excessive loading.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A maxillary first premolar implant-supported, screw-retained crown that was seated, evaluated and restored with composite resin.

 


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Photograph of a patient with a history of night grinding and clenching. An occlusal guard was constructed to protect the fixed prosthodontics from nocturnal parafunctional habits.

 
Together, the prosthodontist and surgeon should develop a yearly maintenance schedule for the patient.

DISCUSSION
Together, the prosthodontist and surgeon should develop a yearly maintenance schedule for the patient and decide who will perform each of the following steps:

– updating the patient’s medical and dental history;
– checking for adequate plaque removal and reviewing the patient’s plaque removal techniques;
– probing only unhealthy tissue with a plastic probe; healthy tissue should not be probed1;
– checking the occlusion;
checking the prosthesis;
– scaling with nonmetallic curettes;
– obtaining radiographs of the implant and prosthesis once a year.

Patients who develop periodontal problems should have more frequent recall appointments: every four, three or even two months. Patients with inadequate dexterity require innovations to their plaque cleaning aids, such as modified inter-proximal brushes and end-tuft brushes.

Fluoride rinses, which are neutral and will not etch porcelain, should be prescribed for caries-prone patients who have extensive porcelain or composite restorations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The maintenance schedule provided above should be followed by the surgeon and prosthodontist, who share medical and dental updates, radiographs, occlusal analysis, restoration analysis and results of treatments performed. Their cooperation and communication provide the patient with the best care without duplication of services.

DO YOU HAVE A TIP TO SHARE?
Do you have a time- or work-saving clinical technique to share with your colleagues? Submit it to JADA’s Clinical Directions department. A Clinical Directions item should be a maximum of two double-spaced typed pages and should include no more than one figure or illustration. Submit items to Clinical Directions, JADA, 211 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, Ill. 60611.

FOOTNOTES

Dr. Williamson is an associate professor and director, Fixed Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice, College of Dentistry, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Ky. 40536-0297. Address reprint requests to Dr. Williamson.

REFERENCES

  1. Apse P, Zarb GA, Schmitt A, Lewis DW. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants–the Toronto Study: peri-implant mucosal response. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:94–111.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS