The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 10, 1409-1417.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AL-HASHIMI, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AL-HASHIMI, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Periodontics

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

The management of Sjögren’s syndrome in dental practice



IBTISAM AL-HASHIMI, B.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background. Sjögren’s syndrome, or SS, is a multisystem inflammatory disorder of the exocrine glands with a wide range of extraglandular involvement. Symptoms of dry eyes and xerostomia, although not invariably present, are characteristic features of SS. An increased risk of oral and dental diseases is a prominent consequence of SS.

Types of Studies Reviewed. The author reviewed recent medical and dental studies that have advanced our understanding of the causes and treatment of SS. She particularly focused on studies addressing the diagnosis and treatment of the oral component of the disease.

Results. Sjögren’s syndrome is a widely underdiagnosed disease. A delay in the diagnosis of SS may have a significant physical, psychological and economic impact on the affected person. The pathogenesis of SS appears to involve a number of factors: immunological, genetic, hormonal and possibly infectious. Successful management of SS requires a multidisciplinary approach, and the dentist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Oral Implications. Impairment of salivary function in SS increases the risk of developing oral diseases. Effective management of oral health comprises enhancement of salivary output (cholinergic agonist drugs such as pilocarpine or cevimeline) and prevention and treatment of dental caries, oral candidiasis and allergic mucositis. Finally, periodic evaluation of various clinical and laboratory parameters is needed to monitor disease status.

Sjögren’s syndrome, or SS, is a chronic inflammatory disease of the exocrine glands with a broad range of extraglandular involvement. Symptoms of dry mouth, or xerostomia, and keratoconjunctivitis sicca, or dry eye, both are hallmarks of SS. A significant consequence of the oral component of SS is increased susceptibility to dental caries and oral infections.1 The exocrine gland involvement in SS is not limited to the salivary and lacrimal glands; it also may involve the glands of the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems, vagina and skin.2 In addition to the exocrine involvement, up to 60 percent of patients may have extraglandular manifestations.3 The extraglandular manifestations may involve the joints, liver, kidneys or nervous system.

The dentist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of Sjögren’s syndrome.


   EPIDEMIOLOGY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sjögren’s syndrome is thought to be the most common autoimmune disease next to rheumatoid arthritis.4 It frequently is described as a disease of middle-aged and elderly women, although it has been reported in children and adolescents as well.5 It is encountered more often in women than in men (at a rate of 9:1).2


   DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinically, SS may occur in two forms: primary and secondary. When the clinical manifestations are limited to the exocrine glands, the condition is considered primary SS. In the presence of another autoimmune disease, it is referred to as secondary SS. Some of the most common autoimmune diseases that may be associated with SS are rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma. Both primary and secondary SS may be accompanied by a broad range of disorders (physical, psychological, hematologic or neurological).

Raynaud’s phenomenon, lymphadenopathy and peripheral neuropathies are among the frequent conditions associated with SS and may vary markedly in severity among patients.3 However, many SS symptoms are deceptively nonspecific, including fatigue, fibromyalgia and arthralgia. The most serious condition associated with SS is malignant lymphoma; the risk of developing lymphoma is up to 44 times higher for patients with primary SS than for age- and sex-matched controls.6


   PATHOGENESIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Histologically, SS is characterized by a lymphocytic infiltration of salivary and lacrimal glands. However, the reduction in salivary volume does not always correlate with the severity of dryness symptoms. Furthermore, even in patients with significant complaints of dryness, it is not unusual to find that only about 30 percent of the gland is infiltrated with inflammatory cells. These observations suggest that glandular infiltration cannot account fully for SS symptoms.7 Inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the functional tissue injury associated with SS.8

Sjögren’s syndrome is considered an autoimmune disease, but our understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease is incomplete. The pathogenesis of SS appears to involve the complex interplay of a number of potential contributory factors. Immunological, neurological, genetic, viral and hormonal factors seem to interact to cause the disease.9

The lack of adequate understanding of the underlying cause of Sjögren’s syndrome and the broad spectrum of its clinical manifestations complicate a prompt diagnosis of the disease.

Up-regulation (increased activity) of the immune response, especially ß-cell activation, and elevated serum autoantibody levels suggest an autoimmune etiology for SS.3 One model for the pathogenesis of SS suggests a two-phase process, nonimmune and immune. In the nonimmune phase, a genetically based abnormality or an infection would trigger glandular epithelial cell death via accelerated apoptosis (programmed cell death). The byproducts of the dead cells would act as autoantigens, provoking an immune response. In the second phase, this immune-mediated inflammatory process would damage the target glands or other organs.10

Current research findings suggest that both neural and immune processes are involved in the pathogenesis of SS.11 An immune-mediated neural pathogenesis for SS is supported by the fact that normal salivary function depends on neural input to the gland. Cholinergic efferent nerves that release acetylcholine induce tearing and salivation by stimulating muscarinic M3 receptors of the lacrimal and salivary glands.7 Investigators have reported that immunoglobulin G from patients with primary SS could bind and activate M3 receptors in lacrimal glands from rats.12

Sjögren’s syndrome is associated with the presence of specific human leukocyte antigens, and people who have a family history of SS are at increased risk of developing the disease. These observations suggest a possible genetic predisposition for SS.1316

The evidence for the involvement of specific viruses in SS is conflicting at present. Some of the viruses that have been implicated in the development of SS are cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis C virus, human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus-1 and human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV.1721 However, no direct correlation has been established between these viruses and SS.

Finally, the fact that SS occurs more often in women than in men suggests a possible role for the sex hormones in the pathogenesis of the disease.22


   DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The lack of adequate understanding of the underlying cause of SS and the broad spectrum of its clinical manifestations complicate a prompt diagnosis of the disease. Several sets of criteria have been proposed to facilitate the diagnosis of SS. Each set requires fulfillment of specific clinical and laboratory tests.2326

Most of the published criteria place considerable emphasis on salivary gland biopsy for the diagnosis of SS. The European Community, or EC, criteria are among the most inclusive. The EC criteria require evaluation of oral signs and symptoms, ocular signs and symptoms, histopathology (salivary gland biopsy) and serum auto-antibodies such as rheumatoid factor, or RF; antinuclear antibody, or ANA; anti-Ro, or anti–-SS-A, antibody; and anti-La or anti–SS-B antibody (boxGo, "European Community Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sjögren’s Syndrome"). Using the EC criteria, the diagnosis of SS requires fulfillment of four of the six criteria. A proposed modification would require, for the diagnosis of SS, the presence of either focal sialadenitis on salivary gland biopsy or antibody among the four criteria that are met.24


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME.*

 

   EVALUATION FOR SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oral involvement. The evaluation of the oral component of SS should include a complete history of illness that emphasizes symptoms of dryness. Impact questions that address symptoms that may be present as a result of reduced salivary output—such as xerostomia, sore mouth, difficulty in chewing or swallowing, and change in taste or smell—also are helpful for evaluating the severity of oral involvement.27 Physical examination should include evaluation of the salivary glands, teeth and oral mucosa. Diagnostic salivary tests may include measurement of salivary output (flow rate), labial salivary gland biopsy, contrast sialography and salivary scintigraphy.

Patient history. Patients may complain of xerostomia, difficulty chewing and swallowing, burning mouth, changes in taste or difficulty wearing dental prostheses.2730 Difficulty in speaking and intolerance of certain foods and beverages are common symptoms of xerostomia.

Because of the subjective nature of xerostomic symptoms, it is important to recognize that patients with SS may be unaware of such symptoms or may not consider them significant. In a 1994 study of more than 600 patients, 15 percent of patients with primary SS and 26 percent of patients with secondary SS did not complain of xerostomia.31

Physical examination. Salivary gland enlargement occurs in one-fourth to two-thirds of patients with primary SS.32 When salivary gland enlargement is present, the affected area usually is not tender to palpation.33 In some cases, however, the diminished salivary flow allows oral bacteria to migrate into the salivary glands and cause recurrent sialadenitis. In such cases, the salivary glands may become tender to palpation. Although SS affects all of the salivary glands, it is not uncommon for recurrent sialadenitis to be limited to one or two salivary glands (Figure 1Go). Therefore, in cases of recurrent sialadenitis, it may be advisable to investigate for possible SS before considering surgical intervention.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Parotid gland swelling and recurrent parotitis in a patient with Sjögren’s syndrome.

 
Oral examination may reveal dry, peeled lips. The oral mucosa may appear dry and erythematous, with or without mucosal sloughing. The reduction in salivary output in patients with SS frequently is associated with increased susceptibility to dental caries, typically involving the cervical region and incisal margin of the teeth. Without adequate preventive measures, dental caries in a patient with xerostomia can destroy the teeth rapidly.

Finally, patients with SS are at higher risk of experiencing recurrent atrophic candidiasis, which often is associated with burning mouth (Figure 2Go).34,35 The diagnosis of candidiasis can be verified by an "oral yeast" culture.34



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Smooth erythematous tongue: oral candidiasis.

 
Diagnostic tests. A variety of tests can be used for objective evaluation of the oral component of SS. Among the most commonly used tests is labial salivary gland biopsy.36 It is advisable for the biopsy to be performed on minor salivary glands, unless a malignancy is suspected.

The biopsy specimen (involving five to seven minor salivary glands) is examined under a light microscope for the presence of inflammatory cell infiltration. The histopathologic findings are graded on a scale according to the number of inflammatory foci per 4 square millimeters, or mm2; a cluster of 50 or more lymphocytes is termed a focus. A finding of at least one focus per 4 mm2 is consistent with the diagnosis of SS, provided other diagnostic criteria are satisfied.23,24

Other diagnostic tests for the oral component of SS include sialometry (measurement of salivary output), salivary electrophoresis, contrast sialography, sequential salivary gland scintigraphy and ultrasonography.

Collection of saliva for sialometry is a painless and simple procedure. Since a wide range of salivary flow rates exists among healthy adults, flow rate measurements alone are inadequate for assessing patients who may have SS.37

Studies from several laboratories, including the author’s, have shown that the electrophoretic profile of salivary proteins of SS patients differs from that of healthy subjects.38 Salivary electrophoresis is a simple and economical procedure with high specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of SS.38 This procedure is not available for commercial use at the present time. Commercial availability of this test will facilitate the diagnosis of SS and help reduce its cost.

Contrast sialography is a radiographic test that allows visualization of salivary gland and duct architecture. It involves slow injection of a contrast medium into Stensen’s duct. Sialograms are graded on a scale of 1, representing punctate sialactasia, to 4, representing end-stage disease.39,40

Scintigraphy is a method for the evaluation of salivary gland function.41,42 Scintigraphy uses the sequential measurement of uptake and excretion of technetium-99m pertechnetate.43 The drawbacks of salivary scintigraphy are that it does not permit visualization of ductal structures and that it is not specific for SS.

Ultrasonographic imaging of the parotid gland is a simple and noninvasive procedure and could be useful for the evaluation of salivary involvement in SS.44

Ophthalmic involvement. Patients with SS typically complain of a dry, sandy, gritty feeling in their eyes or "friction," burning or itchiness of the eyes. The eyes may be sensitive to air drafts and light. Most patients have a history of using tear substitutes.

Diagnostic tests for the ocular component of SS include Schirmer’s test for quantitative measurement of tear production; tear break-up time; the rose bengal test to evaluate ocular surface irritation; and measurement of tear lactoferrin.

Systemic involvement is fairly common among SS patients. It is important to obtain a thorough hematologic workup and complete urinalysis to properly evaluate the patient’s overall health (boxGo, "Routine Laboratory Tests for Sjögren’s Syndrome"). Some of the frequent serologic findings are elevated serum immunoglobulin levels,45 abnormal liver enzyme levels, abnormal blood cell count (leukopenia, lymphocytosis or thrombocytopenia), and detectable levels of autoantibodies, particularly ANA, RF, anti-Ro/anti–SS-A and anti-La/anti–SS-B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
ROUTINE LABORATORY TESTS FOR SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME.

 
Differential diagnosis of SS. Xerostomia is a common clinical complaint and cannot by itself convey a diagnosis. The most severe form of xerostomia is that in which salivary glands are damaged by radiation therapy used to treat malignancies. The xerostomia in SS is due to inflammation and dysfunction of the salivary glands. Conditions such as HIV infection,46 graft-vs.-host disease,47 amyloidosis48,49 and sarcoidosis50,51 also can cause inflammation and damage of the salivary gland. Therefore, these conditions must be excluded before a diagnosis of SS is made (boxGo, "Differential Diagnosis of Xerostomia"). Finally, diabetes mellitus and several medications have been reported to be associated with xerostomia .5254 However, it is important to recognize that there is no evidence to suggest that either diabetes or xerostomia medications cause damage to the salivary glands. Therefore, it is unlikely that people with healthy salivary glands would have an increased risk of developing oral diseases.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF XEROSTOMIA.

 
Xerostomia is a common clinical complaint and cannot by itself convey a diagnosis.


   THE ROLE OF SALIVA IN ORAL HEALTH
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Because saliva performs several protective functions in the oral cavity, a disruption of normal salivary flow has a wide range of detrimental consequences for oral health. Saliva helps prevent dental caries by promoting dental remineralization and by maintaining a physiological oral pH level. 29 Saliva provides a supersaturated environment with respect to calcium and phosphate, thereby helping to prevent demineralization of teeth and to retard calculus formation. Salivary glycoproteins, particularly mucins, maintain the coating and lubrication of the oral mucosa, facilitating speech, mastication and swallowing.29 Saliva also facilitates taste perception, which is crucial to the enjoyment of food and affects nutritional status.29,55 It is worth keeping in mind, too, that the effectiveness of sublingually administered medications (for example, nitroglycerin) may be reduced in patients with xerostomia.

Several salivary proteins possess antimicrobial functions. Salivary enzymes such as lysozymes and lactoperoxidase, as well as secretory immunoglobulin A and histidine-rich peptides (histatins), help to control oral infections.29,5558

One of the key roles of saliva in the oral cavity is formation of the salivary pellicle.59 The salivary pellicle is a tissue coat or a "blanket" that covers the mucosal surfaces and teeth. This tissue coat provides a physical barrier for the underlying structures and acts as a lubricant to facilitate oral functions. When the salivary secretion is diminished, the oral cavity is deprived of this protection. Consequently, the oral mucosa becomes vulnerable to various physical, chemical and microbial insults. Lack of the salivary pellicle subjects patients with SS to mucosal allergies (sometimes called "contact mucositis") to various foods, beverages, dental hygiene products and dental materials60,61 (Figure 3Go).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Intraoral contact mucositis: mucosal sloughing of the cheeks and tongue.

 
Lack of the salivary pellicle also reduces tissue lubrication, which subjects the oral mucosa to traumatic ulcers, especially of the tongue and cheeks (Figure 4Go). Depriving the tooth surface of the salivary pellicle subjects the teeth to various chemical and microbial insults and increases their vulnerability to dental caries.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Traumatic ulcers: scarring and ulceration of the lateral border of the tongue due to biting.

 
Finally, it is important to realize that the oral cavity is a dynamic organ, important for our social and physical well-being. Enjoyment of food and drink as well as talking are key components of people’s social activities. The loss of saliva in SS impairs all oral function and may lead to social withdrawal. This may explain, in part, the high frequency of depression among patients with SS.


   TREATMENT OF THE ORAL COMPONENT OF SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dental clinicians are well-placed to identify patients with this often-overlooked disease. Their contribution to its treatment also is essential, since optimal management of SS requires a multi-disciplinary approach. The dentist, primary care physician, ophthalmologist and rheumatologist all should be involved.

All treatment of the oral component of SS should be tailored to the individual patient’s needs and depends on the severity of the salivary dysfunction.

Prevention and treatment of dental caries. Dentists and dental hygienists must work closely with SS patients to manage the increased frequency of dental caries. Patients with SS require frequent dental visits with regular fluoride treatment. Daily use of a prescription fluoride is highly recommended. Because of the increased mucosal sensitivity, the use of gentle toothpastes with mild flavors is recommended.

Treatment of oral candidiasis. Recurrent oral candidiasis can be treated with topical anti-fungal medications. Sugar-free nystatin solution can be used as a rinse and expectorated to avoid potential systemic side effects. Angular cheilitis can be treated with nystatin or clotrimazole cream. Removable prostheses should be treated separately by soaking in nystatin or chlorhexidine. Adequate treatment of oral candidiasis will improve oral discomfort significantly.

Enhancement of salivary output. Restoring salivary output is a key to ensuring ultimate oral health. Increasing salivary output could minimize oral infections, mucosal irritation and allergies. Stimulation of salivary output can be achieved by either physiological or pharmacological means.

Physiological stimulation. Physiological stimulation can be accomplished by gustatory and masticatory stimuli, such as sugar-free candies and chewing gum. The use of sugar-containing products should be minimized because of their potential cariogenicity. The use of lemon drops and citrus candies also should be minimized, because of their potential demineralizing effect on the teeth.

Pharmacological stimulation. For pharmacological stimulation, two cholinergic agonist drugs, pilocarpine and cevimeline, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of dry mouth associated with SS. Pilocarpine has been shown to stimulate salivary secretion and relieve symptoms of xerostomia in SS.62 The recommended dosage is 5 milligrams four times per day.62 Pilocarpine is contraindicated for patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, iritis and uncontrolled asthma. The most common side effect of pilocarpine is increased sweating.62

Cevimeline is a new cholinergic agonist that has been shown to improve the symptoms of xerostomia in patients with SS.63 It binds selectively to muscarinic M3 receptors in salivary glands64 (also J. Baumgold, Ph.D., and S.L. Max, Ph.D., Daiichi Pharmaceutical Corp., Montvale, N.J., unpublished data, April 1997) and has a longer half-life than pilocarpine.7,65 In comparison with pilocarpine, cevimeline exhibits a greater time for receptor occupancy, which may make its action both longer-lasting and more gradual and thus may minimize some of the side effects experienced with pilocarpine.7

The recommended dosage for cevimeline is 30 mg three times per day. The most common side effect of cevimeline is increased sweating.63 Cevimeline is contraindicated for patients with uncontrolled asthma, acute iritis or narrow-angle glaucoma.63

Selective use of saliva substitutes. The benefit obtained from use of saliva substitutes is limited and of brief duration, but these preparations may be helpful for patients with oral ulceration or denuded epithelium. Patients with removable dental prostheses also may benefit from the use of saliva substitutes. The use of removable prostheses as reservoirs for artificial saliva has been advocated, but in the author’s experience this practice has proved unsuccessful. A number of over-the-counter saliva substitutes are available in the United States.

Hydration. Finally, maintaining reasonably high levels of hydration is helpful to reduce oral dryness. However, excessive water intake, especially of distilled water, should be discouraged; the author’s clinical observations suggest that it could potentially promote loss of electrolytes and precipitate electrolyte imbalance.

Monitoring of salivary output and disease progression. It is important to appreciate that SS is a multisystem disorder. Periodic routine evaluation of the affected organs is important for proper treatment and management of the disease. Periodic evaluation of salivary output and various blood parameters is highly recommended for monitoring the disease. Establishing frequent interaction and communication among the patient’s dentist, ophthalmologist, rheumatologist and primary care physician is a key to optimal patient care.


   CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
SS is a common and underdiagnosed inflammatory disease of the exocrine glands with a significant impact on oral health. Dental practitioners are likely to be the first health care providers to encounter the early signs of SS. Therefore, they should be familiar with the manifestations of the disease and be prepared to take an active role in the diagnosis, management and treatment of the oral complications of SS.



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Dr. Al-Hashimi is the director, Salivary Dysfunction Clinic, Baylor College of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, Texas 75246, e-mail "alhashim{at}ont.com". Address reprint requests to Dr. Al-Hashimi.

 


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EPIDEMIOLOGY
 DIVERSITY OF CLINICAL...
 PATHOGENESIS
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
 EVALUATION FOR SJOGREN’S...
 THE ROLE OF SALIVA...
 TREATMENT OF THE ORAL...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Van der Reijden WA, Vissink A, Veerman EC, Amerongen AV. Treatment of oral dryness related complaints (xerostomia) in Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:465–73.[Free Full Text]

  2. Manthorpe R, Asmussen K, Oxholm P. Primary Sjögren’s syndrome: diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and disease activity. J Rheumatol 1997;24(supplement 50):8–11.

  3. Anaya JM, Talal N. Sjögren’s syndrome and connective tissue diseases associated with other immunologic disorders. In: Koopman WJ, ed. Arthritis and allied conditions: A textbook of rheumatology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:1561–80.

  4. Sjögren’s syndrome. In: Beers MH, Berkow R, eds. The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy. 17th ed. Whitehouse Station, N.J.: Merck; 1999:423–4.

  5. Stiller M, Golder W, Döring E, Biedermann T. Primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome in children: a comparative study. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:176–82.[Medline]

  6. Kassan S, Thomas T, Moutsopolous H, et al. Increased risk of lymphoma in sicca syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:888–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Fox RI, Michelson P. Approaches to the treatment of Sjögren’s syndrome. J Rheumatol 2000;27(supplement 61):15–21.[Medline]

  8. Price EJ, Venables PJ. The etiopathogenesis of Sjögren’s syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1995;25:117–33.[Medline]

  9. Talal N. What is Sjögren’s syndrome and why is it important? J Rheumatol 2000;27(supplement 61):1–3.[Medline]

  10. Sakata K, Sakata A, Kong L, Dang H, Talal N. Role of Fas/FasL interaction in physiology and pathology: the good and the bad. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1998;87:1–7.[Medline]

  11. Humphreys-Beher MG, Brayer J, Yamachika S, Peck AB, Jonsson R. An alternative perspective to the immune response in autoimmune exocrinopathy: induction of functional quiescence rather than destructive autoaggression. Scand J Immunol 1999;49:7–10.[Medline]

  12. Bacman S, Perez Leiros C, Sterin-Bora L, Hubscher O, Arana R, Borda E. Autoantibodies against lacrimal gland M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:151–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Fye KH, Terasaki PI, Moutsopoulos HM, Daniels TE, Michalski JP, Talal N. Association of Sjögren’s syndrome with HLA-B8. Arthritis Rheum 1976;19:883–6.[Medline]

  14. Chused TM, Kassan SS, Opelz G, Moutsopoulos HM, Terasaki PI. Sjögren’s syndrome association with HLA-Dw3. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:895–7.[Abstract]

  15. Moutsopoulos HM, Mann DL, Johnson AH, Chused TM. Genetic differences between primary and secondary sicca syndrome. N Engl J Med 1979;301:761–3.[Medline]

  16. Wilson RW, Provost TT, Bias WB, et al. Sjögren’s syndrome. Influence of multiple HLA-D region alloantigens on clinical and serologic expression. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:1245–53.[Medline]

  17. Scully C. Sjögren’s syndrome: clinical and laboratory features, immunopathogenesis, and management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:510–23.[Medline]

  18. Fox RI, Howell FV, Bone RC, Michelson P. Primary Sjögren syndrome: clinical and immunopathologic features. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1984;14:77–105.[Medline]

  19. Jorgensen C, Legouffe MC, Perney P, et al. Sicca syndrome associated with hepatitis C virus infection. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1166–71.[Medline]

  20. Vernant JC, Buisson G, Magdeleine J, et al. T-lymphocyte alveolitis, tropical spastic paresis and Sjögren’s syndrome. Lancet 1988; 1:177.[Medline]

  21. Itescu S, Winchester R. Diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome: a disorder occurring in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection that may present as a sicca syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1992;18:683–97.[Medline]

  22. Sullivan DA. Sex hormones and Sjögren’s syndrome. J Rheumatol 1997;24(supplement 50):17–32.

  23. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Moutsopoulos HM, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of Sjögren’s syndrome: results of a prospective concerted action supported by the European community. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:340–7.[Medline]

  24. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, and the European Study Group on Diagnostic Criteria for SS. The European classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SS): proposal for a modification of the rules for classification suggested by the analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the criteria performance (abstract 18). J Rheumatol 1997;24 (supplement 50):38.

  25. Manthorpe R, Oxholm P, Prause JU, Schiødt M. The Copenhagen criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol 1986;61(supplement):19–21.

  26. Fox RI, Robinson C, Curd J, Michelson P, Bone R, Howell FV. First international symposium on Sjögren’s syndrome: suggested criteria for classification. Scand J Rheumatol 1986;61(supplement):28–30.

  27. Al-Hashimi I, Khuder S, Haghighat N, Zipp M. Frequency and predictive value of the clinical manifestations in Sjögren’s syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med 2001;30:1–6.[Medline]

  28. Rhodus NL, Colby S, Moller K, Bereuter J. Quantitative assessment of dysphagia in patients with primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79:305–10.[Medline]

  29. Mandel ID. The functions of saliva. J Dent Res 1987;(66 special issue):623–7.

  30. Dusek M, Simmons J, Buschang PH, Al-Hashimi I. Masticatory function in patients with xerostomia. Gerodontology 1996;13:3–8.[Medline]

  31. Daniels TE, Whitcher JP. Association of patterns of labial salivary gland inflammation with keratoconjuctivitis sicca. Analysis of 618 patients with suspected Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37:869–77.[Medline]

  32. Manoussakis MN, Moutsopoulos HM. Sjögren’s syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32:843–60.[Medline]

  33. Bloch KJ, Buchanan WW, Wohl MJ, Bunim JJ. Sjögren’s syndrome: a clinical, pathological, and serological study of sixty-two cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1965;44:187–231.[Medline]

  34. Abraham CM, Al-Hashimi I, Haghighat N. Evaluation of the levels of oral Candida in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:65–8.[Medline]

  35. Hernandez YL, Daniels TE. Oral candidiasis in Sjögren’s syndrome: prevalence, clinical correlations, and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:324–9.[Medline]

  36. Chisholm DM, Mason DK. Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren’s disease. J Clin Pathol 1968;21:656–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Ship JA, Fox PC, Baum BJ. How much saliva is enough? ‘Normal’ function defined. JADA 1991;122:63–9.[Abstract]

  38. Al-Hashimi I, Haghighat N, Fox PC. Salivary electrophoresis in the diagnosis of Sjogren’s Syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:542–7.[Medline]

  39. Rubin P, Holt JF. Secretory sialography in diseases of the major salivary glands. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1957;77:575–98.[Medline]

  40. Dijkstra PF. Classification and differential diagnosis of sialographic characteristics in Sjögren syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1980;10:10–7.[Medline]

  41. Umehara I, Yamada I, Murata Y, Takahashi Y, Okada N, Shibuya H. Quantitative evaluation of salivary gland scintigraphy in Sjögren’s syndrome. J Nucl Med 1999;40:64–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Aung W, Yamada I, Umehara I, Ohbayashi N, Yoshino N, Shibuya H. Sjögren’s syndrome: comparison of assessments with quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy and contrast sialography. J Nucl Med 2000;41:257–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Schall GL, Anderson LG, Wolf RO, et al. Xerostomia in Sjögren’s syndrome: evaluation by sequential salivary scintigraphy. JAMA 1971;216:2109–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  44. Makula E, Pokorny G, Kiss M, et al. The place of magnetic resonance and ultrasonographic examinations of the parotid gland in the diagnosis and follow-up of primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:97–104.[Medline]

  45. Atkinson JC, Fox PC. Sjögren’s syndrome: oral and dental considerations. JADA 1993;124:74–86.[Abstract]

  46. Kordossis T, Paikos S, Aroni K, et al. Prevalence of Sjögren’s-like syndrome in a cohort of HIV-1-positive patients: descriptive pathology and immunology. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:691–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  47. Nagler R, Marmary Y, Krausz Y, Chisin R, Markitziu A, Nagler A. Major salivary gland dysfunction in human acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;17:219–24.[Medline]

  48. Richey TK, Bennion SD. Etiologies of the sicca syndrome: primary systemic amyloidosis and others. Int J Dermatol 1996;35:553–7.[Medline]

  49. Al-Hashimi I, Drinnan AA, Wright JR, Levine MJ. Oral amyloidosis: two unusual case presentations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:586–91.[Medline]

  50. Sack KE, Whitcher JP, Carterton NL, Greenspan JS, Daniels TE. Sarcoidosis mimicking Sjögren’s syndrome: histopathologic observations. J Clin Rheumatol 1998;4:13–16.[Medline]

  51. Drosos AA, Constantopoulos SH, Psychos D, Stefanon D, Papadimitriou CS, Moutsopoulos HM. The forgotten cause of sicca complex: sarcoidosis. J Rheumatol 1989;16:1548–51.[Medline]

  52. Sreebny LM, Yu A, Green A, Valdini A. Xerostomia in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1992;15:900–4.[Abstract]

  53. Chavez EM, Taylor GW, Borrell LN, Ship JA. Salivary function and glycemic control in older persons with diabetes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:305–11.[Medline]

  54. Simmons DD, Al-Hashimi I, Haghighat N. Effect of xerostomic medications on stimulated salivary flow rate in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Quintessence Int 2000;31:196–200.[Medline]

  55. Levine MJ, Jones PC, Loomis RE, et al. Functions of human saliva and salivary mucins: an overview. J Oral Pathol 1987;66(special issue): 24–7.

  56. Zipp MM, Yasbin L, Al-Hashimi I. The effect of parotid salivary flow rate on the levels of salivary antimicrobial proteins in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Quintessence Int 1999;30:700–5.[Medline]

  57. Bercier JG, Al-Hashimi I, Haghighat N, Rees TD, Oppenheim FG. Salivary histatins in patients with recurrent oral candidiasis. J Oral Pathol Med 1999;28:26–9.[Medline]

  58. Oppenheim FG, Xu T, McMillian FM, et al. Histatins, a novel family of histidine-rich proteins in human parotid secretion. Isolation, characterization, primary structure, and fungistatic effects on Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 1988;263:7472–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  59. Al-Hashimi I, Levine MJ. Characterization of the in vivo salivary-derived enamel pellicle. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34:289–95.[Medline]

  60. De Rossi SS, Greenberg MS. Intraoral contact allergy: a literature review and case reports. JADA 1998;129:1435–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. DeLattre VF. Factors contributing to adverse soft tissue reactions due to the use of tartar control toothpastes: report of a case and literature review. J Periodontol 1999;70:803–7.[Medline]

  62. Vivino FB, Al-Hashimi I, Khan Z, et al. Pilocarpine tablets for the treatment of dry mouth and dry eye symptoms in patients with Sjögren syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, multicenter trial. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:174–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  63. Evoxac capsules (Daiichi). In: Physicians’ Desk Reference. PDR Electronic Library. Available at: "www.pdrel.com". Accessed Jan. 12, 2001.

  64. Iwabuchi Y, Masuhara T. Sialogogic activities of SNI-2011 compared with those of pilocarpine and McN-A-343 in rat salivary glands: identification of a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of Sjögren’s syndrome. Gen Pharmacol 1994;25:123–9.[Medline]

  65. Masunaga H, Ogawa H, Uematsu Y, Tomizuka T, Yasuda H, Takeshita Y. Long-lasting salivation induced by a novel muscarinic receptor agonist SNI-2011 in rats and dogs. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 339:1–9.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. S. Kassan and H. M. Moutsopoulos
Clinical Manifestations and Early Diagnosis of Sjogren Syndrome
Arch Intern Med, June 28, 2004; 164(12): 1275 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
T. Beikler and T. F. Flemmig
IMPLANTS IN THE MEDICALLY COMPROMISED PATIENT
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, July 1, 2003; 14(4): 305 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AL-HASHIMI, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AL-HASHIMI, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Periodontics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS