The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 12, 1639-1640.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, T. C.

LETTERS

ANOTHER VIEW

I realize that using live patients is a controversial issue among practicing dentists, but I feel that the benefits of this practice are no longer merited when considering all the other issues.

We are fortunate in our Texas delegation to have fine representation from our ASDA members. They have shared with us the examples of irregularities in patient selection that have convinced me that other methods need to be developed. However, my friends who serve on state boards tell me that they are concerned that a viable alternative is not ready at this time, and may not be available until some time to come. Like so many other issues, there is no easy answer.

I have been a presenter of the ADA’s practice management seminar called "SUCCESS" for the past 11 years. During that time, I have met with ASDA representatives and officers at many dental schools across the country. I am always impressed with their knowledge of the issues and their ability to get their point across in a professional and informed manner.

I hope that they can continue to stay informed on this issue. Just because the ADA House of Delegates passed a favorable resolution [64H] on this issue during the 2000 annual session in Chicago doesn’t ensure that the intent of the resolution will come to pass in the time frame that was indicated in the resolution.

Like with so many other issues, the delegates must be continually educated on the merits of a good idea, since turnover occurs and sometimes delegates are elected for single issues to carry out the concerns of dentists who support the losing side. People like Dr. Meskin, who have a talent to communicate with sound logic and reason, are worth so much when it comes to formulating "dental public opinion."

From the onset, this issue appears to be one that requires little discussion, but as stories are told and information and statistics are revealed, opinions can change. And all of a sudden, something that seemed rather straightforward before seems very complex indeed. Thank you, Dr. Meskin, for your efforts to ensure safe exams for patients that can also help guarantee competent practitioners for the future.



Thomas C. Harrison

President 2001–2002, Greater Houston Dental, Society ADA Delegate, 2001–2003, Katy, Texas



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, T. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS