The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 6, 692-693.
© 2002 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stein, L.

LETTERS

INJECTION CONCERNS

I found "Complications of an Intra-Arterial Injection From an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block" by Dr. Brian Webber and colleagues (December JADA) interesting. It added another item with which I should concern myself during such an injection.

I have been practicing for 28 years now and have seen side effects of anesthetic injections including syncope, tachycardia, sleepiness, anxiety, paresthesia, hypoglycemia, etc. Now it seems that temporary blindness, diplopia and ptosis can be added to the list.

The article never addressed a very common problem many dentists engage in. In their haste to get the patients in and done, many have a habit of injecting much too fast. The anesthetic injection should take nearly two minutes (one minute per cubic centimeter) with very frequent aspiration—even if the needle is not moved.

This technique alone makes most anesthetic injections painless (and makes me wonder why anyone would purchase a computer-assisted anesthetic injection system).

I have had patients react to an injection reporting a shooting pain over a portion of the face not affected by the nerve involved. I have always assumed that it was a pressurized vein or artery. However, with the first reaction, I reposition the needle and have never had the reaction described in the article.

The article also makes reference to a second injection 30 seconds later—making me wonder if perhaps a rapid technique was used.

While I am sure that the facts about the consequences of an intra-arterial injection may well be true, I have a feeling that volume and speed of injection may well have contributed to the problem.

This was never addressed in the article.



Laurence Stein, D.D.S.

Miami



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stein, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS