The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 10, 1309.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgano, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morgano, S. M.

LETTERS

VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURES

In their April JADA article, "Vertical Root Fractures: Clinical and Radiographic Diagnosis," Drs. Stephen Cohen, Lucia Blanco and Louis Berman stated that the majority of the vertical root fractures in their study were "caused by poorly designed dowels (too long, too wide or both)." Nevertheless, this cause-and-effect statement related to the length of the posts is speculative, and contradicts the results of the majority of previously published studies on this issue.

A classic retrospective study by Sorensen and Martinoff 1 indicated that longer posts had the highest probability of clinical success. When the length of the posts equaled the length of the clinical crowns, the failure rate reported by Sorensen and Martinoff was 2.5 percent. Posts that were one-quarter the length of their respective clinical crowns recorded a failure rate of 25 percent—a tenfold increase.

A prior study of teeth with vertical root fractures by Fuss and colleagues2 reported that two-thirds of the posts associated with vertically fractured teeth were extremely short, terminating in the cervical third of the roots. In vitro biomechanical studies also have suggested that better stress distribution occurs with longer posts.35

Furthermore, the authors’ conclusions concerning the lengths of the posts appear to be inconsistent with the radiographs displayed in their article. Many of the teeth illustrated received less-than-optimal dentistry, such as inadequate endodontic obturation with ill-fitting artificial crowns, and most of the posts were too wide. However, most posts could be judged too short, not too long. Moreover, it appeared that most restorations lacked a ferrule, and this deficiency probably represented the primary factor contributing to the root fractures.6

The topic of restoring pulp-less teeth with posts and cores is complex and controversial, but few authorities on the subject would advocate short posts. Preservation of sound coronal and radicular tooth structure is critical. Tooth preparations for artificial crowns should preserve as much tooth structure as practical to ensure an adequate ferrule, and the post channel should be as narrow as possible.7

With regard to length, the potential for clinical success is enhanced when the post is as long as practical, consistent with anatomical limitations of the root and the need to maintain the apical seal.6


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52(1):28–35.[Medline]

  2. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001;27(1):46–8.[Medline]

  3. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1987:185–203.

  4. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(2): 140–7.[Medline]

  5. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(6):558–67.[Medline]

  6. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(6):643–57.[Medline]

  7. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75(4):375–80.[Medline]



Steven M. Morgano, D.M.D.

Professor of Restorative Sciences and Biomaterials Director, Division of Postdoctoral Prosthodontics, Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgano, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morgano, S. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS