First in an occasional series of articles about local anesthesia
The option of administering local anesthetic, one of the most common procedures performed in dentistry today, has been available to the dentist for more than 100 years. Occasionally, however, it can be one of the most frustrating procedures when the outcome is incomplete or ineffective anesthesia. To minimize anesthetic failure, the dentist must have a sound knowledge of the anatomy of the head region, particularly the neuroanatomy of the maxillary and mandibular regions of the face.
To achieve profound dental local anesthesia, dentists must have a thorough knowledge of the details of sensory innervation to the maxilla and mandible.
Current studies afford a more detailed knowledge of the branching of the various divisions of the trigeminal nerve, the great sensory nerve of the head region. To improve the incidence of safe and effective dental local anesthesia, we provide an update of the peripheral distribution of the trigeminal nerve.
 |
ANESTHESIA OF THE MAXILLARY TEETH
|
|---|
From an anatomical perspective, maxillary injections generally are believed to be not only more predictable than mandibular injections, but also more benign and associated with fewer complications. However, this is not necessarily true, particularly for block injections. For example, the posterior superior alveolar, or PSA, or tuberosity block, infraorbital block and the second division block carry the needle into the depths of the midface and approximate to the base of the skull, the orbit and associated structures. Complications associated with such maxillary injections (such as arterial bleeding and temporary blindness [amaurosia]) can result in considerable difficulty and discomfort for the patient.1,2
In this section, we review innervation peculiarities of the maxilla, as well as anatomical considerations that relate to specific techniques of administering local anesthetic.
PSA nerve block.
The outer cortical plate of the maxillary alveolus is almost always sufficiently thin and porous in the adult to allow for effective infiltration anesthesia. When subsequent buccal infiltration anesthesia is inadequate, the alternative course of action for the dentist is to perform a PSA or tuberosity nerve block. With this block injection, the dentist directs the needle high onto the tuberosity of the maxilla to approach the PSA nerve before it enters the bony maxilla.
Occasionally, the PSA block will not result in complete maxillary molar anesthesia. This may occur because of displaced branches of the PSA nerves entering the palatal root of the molars, the lingual aspect of the premolars, or both.3 In these instances, the dentist must remember that the greater palatine injection (discussed below) may add to the efficiency of a PSA injection.
Middle superior alveolar nerve block.
Traditionally, researchers and clinicians have understood that there are three nerves (the anterior superior alveolar, or ASA, middle superior alveolar, or MSA, and the PSA) that carry sensation to the maxillary teeth. It is interesting that many patients have only two maxillary alveolar nerves; the MSA nerve, the innervation ascribed to the premolar teeth, often is missing.4,5 In these instances, the PSA nerve innervates the pre-molar/canine region, and infiltration anesthesia in the region of the molars induces primary anesthesia for the premolars.
The clinician may have to modify his or her approach to infiltrating in the premolar area because of an occasional anatomical feature.
Unfortunately, there are no anatomical predictors of the pattern of innervation for an individual. When attempting to anesthetize the maxillary premolars, the dentist should understand that infiltration in the vicinity of the apexes of these teeth will induce anesthesia regardless of the origin of the dental nerves.
In addition, the clinician may have to modify his or her approach to infiltrating in the premolar area because of an occasional anatomical feature. In some patients, an extensive bony prominence, the zygomaticoalveolar crest, can approximate the apexes of the premolar teeth, which prevents the needles approach to this vicinity. Because most, if not all, of the MSA fibers are incorporated into the PSA nerve, molar infiltration or a PSA nerve block would be the alternative choice in these cases.
ASA nerve block.
Some dentists consider the infraorbital or ASA nerve block to be a complicated injection fraught with risks and to be avoided. Accordingly, dentists do not use the ASA nerve block with the same frequency as they do the PSA block. This might seem to be primarily because of the dentists lack of understanding of the anatomy involved, as well as a misconception regarding the dangers to the eye. Actually, the ASA nerve block can be extremely safe as well as highly successful when one adheres to a particular protocol based on a sound knowledge of the anatomy, specifically an awareness of the relative location of the infraorbital foramen.
In adults, the infraorbital foramen lies significantly below the infraorbital rim (8 to 10 millimeters), a safe distance from the cavity of the orbit. To locate the infraorbital foramen, the dentist can palpate a small depression in the infraorbital rimthe infraorbital notchcreated by the zygomaticomaxillary suture. The clinician places his or her finger in this notch, and directs the needle through the vestibular mucosa over the first premolar tooth and toward the finger. The tip of the needle stays approximately 10 mm below the infraorbital rim.
The needle actually penetrates the soft tissue to a minimum depth of approximately 10 to 12 mm because of the height of the maxillary vestibule and the relative position of the foramen. The needle should stay adjacent to the periosteum to avoid engaging the overlying soft tissues of the face, where the facial artery could be encountered, creating significant bleeding. In addition, the clinician should be aware that with this injection, he or she may anesthetize peripheral branches of the facial nerve (VII) and render the patient with a partial facial paralysis. The dentist should advise the patient that this paralysis is transient and is of no lasting consequence.
In children and adolescents, the vertical growth of the facial skeleton is incomplete, and the infraorbital foramen is closer to the infraorbital rim than it is in adults. For this reason, the dentist should exercise more caution when administering an infraorbital block in the younger patient.
Palatal innervation.
The mucosa of the hard palate and the palatal gingiva are supplied by the nasopalatine and greater palatine nerves. The boundary between the areas innervated by the two nerves corresponds roughly to a line drawn between the maxillary canines; however, the two areas are not so sharply delineated as such an imaginary line might suggest. By severing the nasopalatine nerve, Langford6 showed that the greater palatine nerve may play a larger role in the innervation of the anterior palate than had previously been thought.
Nasopalatine nerve block.
Fibers of the superior alveolar plexus occasionally join the nasopalatine nerve just below the nasal floor and travel with the nasopalatine nerve to reach the central incisor on the side of the mouth being innervated. It may be necessary to anesthetize the nasopalatine nerve to completely anesthetize the central incisors.3,7,8 This is best accomplished by injecting immediately lateral to the incisive papilla, with the needle directed upward, backward and slightly medially.
Greater palatine nerve block.
Most anatomy textbooks place the greater palatine foramen, which is accessed to administer a greater palatine nerve block or a second division nerve block, palatally opposite the second molar. More recent studies,911 however, localize the greater palatine foramen farther posteriorly than is traditionally depicted. One study10 showed this foramen to be opposite or slightly distal to the third molar or its extraction site (57 percent). The foramen has been shown to lie 1.9 mm in front of the posterior border of the hard palate and 15 mm from the palatal midline.10 These measurements are useful for more easily locating the greater palatine foramen and enhancing the anesthetic injection technique in the posterior palate.
The buccal cortical plate of the mandible most often is sufficiently dense to preclude effective infiltration anesthesia in its vicinity.
Trunk anesthesia immediately in the vicinity of the foramen is recommended to avoid complications such as postoperative ulceration or necrosis after palatal injections directed more anteriorly.
The greater palatine injection also may add to the efficacy of a buccal infiltration or PSA injection, if the latter does not render totally effective anesthesia. The greater palatine injection influences the nerves that enter the palatal root of the molars, the lingual aspect of the premolars, or both.7,8 These nerves are displaced branches of the buccally located superior alveolar nerves, which enter the teeth from above.
 |
ANESTHESIA OF THE MANDIBULAR TEETH
|
|---|
The buccal cortical plate of the mandible most often is sufficiently dense to preclude effective infiltration anesthesia in its vicinity. Therefore, the dentist must rely on block anesthesia for effectively anesthetizing mandibular teeth. It is interesting to note that various descriptions of the so-called usual innervation of mandibular teeth are generalized and incomplete. They do not accurately reflect the anatomical variability of various sensory nerves to the mandible. This could be one reason why the rate of failure in achieving adequate pulpal anesthesia via the inferior alveolar nerve block injection has been so high.12,13
The traditional approach to inferior alveolar anesthesia (that is, the Halstead method) has a reported success rate of only 71 to 87 percent, and incomplete anesthesia is not uncommon.1214 Several possible anatomical variations may explain this incomplete anesthesia. We discuss these variations below.
Inferior alveolar nerve block.
The most common approach to inferior alveolar anesthesia is the traditional Halstead method.8,14,15 In this method, the inferior alveolar nerve is approached in the pterygomandibular space, called the infratemporal fossa, via an intraoral route located just before the nerve enters the mandibular foramen.16 This space is entered laterally through the buccinator muscle between the anterior bony ramus, with its associated tendon of the temporalis muscle, and medially through the pterygomandibular raphe and the anterior border of the medial pterygoid muscle.
As the target site for the deposition of anesthetic solution in the conventional inferior alveolar block injection, the mandibular foramen is an essential structure to accurately locate. Nicholson17 examined 80 dry adult human mandibles and used calipers to measure the position of the mandibular foramen relative to various landmarks. The rigorous demarcation and definition of the landmarks set this work apart from earlier studies of this foramen.18 He found that the position of the foramen is indeed variable, and it is usually found anterior to the midpoint of the ramus of the mandible when the anterior border of the mandible is defined as the internal oblique ridge (that is, temporal crest).
Bremer18 described the foramen as being slightly above the level of the molars; however, Nicholson could not confirm this. Nicholson17 and Afsar and colleagues19 found that the foramen was located below the occlusal surface of the molars in many cases. These authors concluded that clinicians should be aware of the variability in the location of the mandibular foramen when seeking to anesthetize the inferior alveolar nerve. In particular, Afsar and colleagues19 suggested that dentists consider use of panoramic radiographs in locating the mandibular foramen rather than relying on bony landmarks.
During administration of anesthetic to the inferior alveolar nerve, the clinician must be aware of the proximal extremity of the maxillary artery, as well as the course of the inferior alveolar artery.
During administration of anesthetic to the inferior alveolar nerve, the clinician must be aware of the proximal extremity of the maxillary artery, as well as the course of the inferior alveolar artery. Lacouture and colleagues20 found that the proximal portion of the maxillary artery crossed the posterior ramus of the mandible at a level that is closer to the level of the mandibular foramen than has been taught traditionally. This same study20 showed a significant incidence of inferiorly directed looping of the maxillary artery immediately above the level of the mandibular foramen (Figure 1
21).