The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 135, No 3, 276.
© 2004 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papazian, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papazian, G. A.

LETTERS

TOTAL-ETCH VERSUS SELF-ETCH

I have an observation on December JADA’s "Total-Etch Versus Self-Etch Adhesive: Effect on Postoperative Sensitivity," by Dr. Jorge Perdigão and colleagues.

The article clearly defines the two techniques. However, many practitioners have found that the self-etch technique resulted in significantly less postoperative sensitivity. The same practitioners also question, though, whether this self-etch does indeed etch the enamel margins as well as the total-etch technique does.

For these two reasons, many practitioners, including myself, use a combination of the two methods. The combined technique is as follows: first, the enamel only is etched with the 34 percent phosphoric acid and rinsed. It is important here to use an etching acid gel rather than a runny almost-liquid. This way, the etch will not run down and touch the dentin at all. Also, in this case, it is not necessary to use the etch for only 15 seconds, since the dentin is not involved.

Second, the self-etch is used on the dentin of the preparation. One tries to use the self-etch on the dentin only, but if some touches the etched enamel margins, it is of no consequence.

I firmly believe that the combined technique uses the strong component of each system, and the result is therefore better than either of the techniques by itself.



George A. Papazian, D.D.S.

Long Beach, Calif.



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papazian, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papazian, G. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS