HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Squire, C. F. Articles by Largent, B. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Squire, C. F. Articles by Largent, B. A.

Dr. Weinstock correctly points out that member-dentists have an affirmative obligation under the ADA’s Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct, Section 4.C, "to report to the appropriate reviewing agency, as determined by the local component or constituent dental society, instances of gross or continual faulty treatment by other dentists." We couldn’t agree more that dentists must be mindful of, and remain ethically committed to, this professional responsibility.

Depending on the circumstances, the appropriate reviewing agency may be a peer-review committee, both ethics and peer-review committees or the dental board. Regrettably, the Council on Ethics, Bylaws and Judicial Affairs has heard recent complaints about unjustified criticism, which is what triggered the June "Ethical Moment." Both issues have bearing on patient welfare and the profession as a whole. We thank Dr. Weinstock for sharing his insights.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Squire, C. F. Articles by Largent, B. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Squire, C. F. Articles by Largent, B. A.