The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 136, No 11, 1512.
© 2005 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, C.

LETTERS

Author’s response

I would agree with Dr. Weaver that there are ongoing controversies concerning connecting implants to teeth. In my article, the purpose of this section was to review the fact that it is not considered common practice to routinely connect teeth to implants, though there are times when anatomical limitations, patient’s desires or costs necessitate this approach. It should be done with care, using rigid framework designs and with informed consent of the patient.

The literature contains numerous citations (commonly, case reports or serial case series) that cite acceptable outcomes with prosthetic connection between implants and teeth, though concern has been raised with two recent systematic evidence-based reviews.

In one, a prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed indicating an elevated incidence of complications.1 A systematic review of the entire dental literature (The Cochrane Collaboration, "www.cochrane.org/docs/descrip.htm") and the recent systematic review of dental implant systems2 also raise concerns about the clinical concept of connecting teeth to implants.

Dr. Weaver is correct that many clinical procedures are controversial, and this places on the clinician the responsibility to plan the restorative treatment carefully, using materials and procedures supported by the current best evidence.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Block MS, Lirette D, Gardiner D, et al. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:473–87.[Medline]

  2. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr A, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int J Prosthod 2004;17:607–41.



Clark Stanford, D.D.S., Ph.D., Centennial Fund Professor for Clinical Research

College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS