The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 136, No 9, 1295-1297.
© 2005 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, B. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

CLINICAL DIRECTIONS

An alternative technique for applying fluoride varnish



BRIAN D. HODGSON, D.D.S.

Fluoride varnish is a valuable tool in the prevention of tooth decay. Studies have demonstrated its effectiveness at arresting early cavitated lesions,1,2 remineralizing interproximal incipient smooth surface lesions35 and preventing caries.610 Medical personnel in many public health clinics now are applying these varnishes in an attempt to minimize treatment needs and reduce access-to-care problems.11 Several authors have reviewed the literature and recommended that fluoride varnishes be incorporated increasingly into preventive dentistry programs.1215

One of the main advantages of fluoride varnish is that it releases fluoride over 24 hours16 and appears to increase the calcium fluoride reservoirs that aid in long-term fluoride release.10 In an in vitro model, fluoride was released over five to six months.17 In addition, Skold-Larsson and colleagues18 demonstrated that these varnishes are capable of maintaining elevated fluoride levels in the plaque adjacent to fixed orthodontic appliances for up to one week. Fluoride varnish is well-tolerated by patients and is relatively easy to apply.19

The varnish can be purchased in bulk 10-milliliter tubes or in individual prepackaged applicators. The varnishes currently available in the United States are Duraphat (5 percent sodium fluoride/2.26 percent fluoride, Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals, Canton, Mass.), Duraflor (5 percent sodium fluoride/2.26 percent fluoride, Medicom, Buffalo, N.Y.), Fluor Protector (1 percent difluorosilane/0.1 percent fluoride, Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, N.Y.) and CavityShield (5 percent sodium fluoride/2.26 percent fluoride, Omnii Oral Pharmaceuticals, West Palm Beach, Fla.).

The application technique recommended by manufacturers is as follows.

– Dispense approximately 0.5 mL of varnish into a small well. (Prepackaged individual-dose systems come with their own well that is filled with varnish.)
– Lightly dry the teeth with air or gauze.
– Isolate the teeth to prevent moisture recontamination.
– Paint the varnish onto the teeth with a brush or another type of applicator. The varnish sets on contact with the slightly moist teeth.

From a clinical practice perspective, the major limitation of this technique is the need to frequently reload the brush with the varnish. Because the brush can hold only a limited quantity of varnish, much of the time needed to administer this treatment involves multiple reloadings of the brush and re-entry into the mouth to apply the varnish to the teeth. These time and motion inefficiencies are particularly problematic when treating an uncooperative child.

The following technique improves the efficiency of applying the varnish in an active pediatric practice, and this procedure can be performed easily in a public health clinic.

APPLICATION TECHNIQUE
The clinician abuts a 10-mL tube of fluoride varnish to the end of a 5-mL plastic syringe with a Luer-lok end (Becton, Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). He or she then slowly expresses the contents of the tube while simultaneously retracting the plunger on the syringe, filling the syringe with the product. If any air is incorporated during this process, it is important to remove it by uprighting the syringe, waiting for the air bubble to gather at the tip and compressing the syringe slowly until the air is fully expressed. If the air is left in the syringe, the air bubble will be compressed when the clinician depresses the plunger, and this will force more of the varnish out of the syringe when he or she stops pushing the plunger.

The practitioner then attaches an 18-gauge plastic disposable microbrush tip (Flowthru Microbrush-Style applicator, Microbrush, Grafton, Wis.) to the end of the syringe. He or she then dries and isolates the teeth as recommended by the varnish manufacturers. The clinician slowly expresses the fluoride varnish from the syringe through the brush tip. The foam pellet attached to the end of this tip enables him or her to paint the varnish onto the teeth as the material is expressed (FigureGo).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure. Fluoride varnish applied with the syringe technique.

 
Several authors have demonstrated that bulk supplies of fluoride varnish separate over time and result in a nonuniform distribution of fluoride content per milliliter of varnish.5,13,20 Manufacturers recommend that clinicians knead the tubes of fluoride varnish before filling the syringes to homogenize the fluoride content. Once the syringes are filled, the practitioner can alternately pull back and push up on the plunger of the syringe to remix the contents and achieve a more uniform distribution of fluoride.

I have used this technique only with two of the sodium fluoride varnishes (Duraphat and Duraflor), not with the silane fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector). The sodium fluoride varnishes are much thicker (a honeylike consistency) than the silane varnish (which is similar to acetone). If a clinician were to attempt to use this technique with the silane varnish, he or she would need to use a disposable tip with a smaller lumen gauge; however, even then, I do not know if the technique would be successful in applying the varnish adequately.

This technique enables the practitioner to apply the material in approximately one-half the time required when using a brush alone, and the amount of wasted material (the volume left in the syringe tip) is minimal. In the event that too much varnish is expressed from the syringe, the practitioner can distribute it easily to adjacent teeth using the brush tip, thereby ensuring that the appropriate amount of varnish is applied to all teeth.

CONCLUSION
This modified technique is most useful when treating an uncooperative child. The increased efficiency with which the varnish is applied to the teeth reduces much of the time that would be needed to maintain an adequately dry field while repeatedly filling the brush, thus reducing the child’s distress.

FOOTNOTES

Dr. Hodgson is an assistant professor, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Developmental Sciences, 1801 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wis. 53233, e-mail "brian.hodgson{at}marquette.edu". Address reprint requests to Dr. Hodgson.

REFERENCES

  1. Autio-Gold JT, Courts F. Assessing the effect of fluoride varnish on early enamel carious lesions in the primary dentition. JADA 2001;132:1247–53.

  2. Milgrom P, Rothen M, Spadafora A, Skaret E. A case report: arresting dental caries. J Dent Hyg 2001;75:241–3.[Medline]

  3. Tranaeus S, Al-Khateeb S, Bjorkman S, Twetman S, Angmar-Mansson B. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to monitor incipient lesions in caries-active children: a comparative study of remineralisation by fluoride varnish and professional cleaning. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109(2):71–5.[Medline]

  4. Schmit JL, Staley RN, Wefel JS, Kanellis M, Jakobsen JR, Keenan PJ. Effect of fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to brackets bonded with RMGI cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(2): 125–34.[Medline]

  5. Hazelrigg CO, Dean JA, Fontana M. Fluoride varnish concentration gradient and its effect on enamel demineralization. Pediatr Dent 2003;25(2):119–26.[Medline]

  6. Zimmer S. Caries-preventive effects of fluoride products when used in conjunction with fluoride dentifrice. Caries Res 2001;35(supplement 1):18–21.

  7. Strohmenger L, Brambilla E. The use of fluoride varnishes in the prevention of dental caries: short review. Oral Dis 2001;7(2):71–80.[Medline]

  8. Hicks J, Wild T, Flaitz CM, Seybold S. Fluoride varnishes and caries development in primary tooth enamel: an in vitro study. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:300, 304–10.

  9. Weinstein P, Domoto P, Koday M, Leroux B. Results of a promising open trial to prevent baby bottle tooth decay: a fluoride varnish study. ASDC J Dent Child 1994;61:338–41.[Medline]

  10. Ogaard B. The cariostatic mechanism of fluoride. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(1 supplement):10–7.

  11. Rozier RG, Sutton BK, Bawden JW, Haupt K, Slade GD, King RS. Prevention of early childhood caries in North Carolina medical practices: implications for research and practice. J Dent Educ 2003;67:876–85.[Abstract]

  12. Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A. Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(3): CD002279.

  13. Vaikuntam J. Fluoride varnishes: should we be using them? Pediatr Dent 2000;22:513–6.[Medline]

  14. Seppa L. Efficacy and safety of fluoride varnishes. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(1 supplement):18–26.

  15. Beltran-Aguilar ED, Goldstein JW, Lockwood SA. Fluoride varnishes: a review of their clinical use, cariostatic mechanism, efficacy and safety. JADA 2000;131:589–96.

  16. Eakle WS, Featherstone JD, Weintraub JA, Shain SG, Gansky SA. Salivary fluoride levels following application of fluoride varnish or fluoride rinse. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:462–9.[Medline]

  17. Castillo JL, Milgrom P, Kharasch E, Izutsu K, Fey M. Evaluation of fluoride release from commercially available fluoride varnishes. JADA 2001;132:1389–92.

  18. Skold-Larsson K, Modeer T, Twetman S. Fluoride concentration in plaque in adolescents after topical application of different fluoride varnishes. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4(1):31–4.[Medline]

  19. Warren DP, Henson HA, Chan JT. Dental hygienist and patient comparisons of fluoride varnishes to fluoride gels. J Dent Hyg 2000;74(2):94–101.[Medline]

  20. Shen C, Autio-Gold J. Assessing fluoride concentration uniformity and fluoride release from three varnishes. JADA 2002;133(2): 176–82.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HODGSON, B. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS