The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 137, No 4, 442.
© 2006 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markiewicz, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Markiewicz, M. R.

LETTERS

Author response from Dr. Markiewicz and colleagues

We would like to thank Dr. Lasser for his comments. His questions beg further discussion and inquiry.

Dr. Lasser raises an intuitive point about the possible impact of gum chewing and the consumption of hard-shelled dry fruit and root edibles (carrots and nuts) on patients taking bisphosphonates. Although it is well-known that bisphosphonate medications reduce bone turnover, there is no scientific evidence that substantiates a correlation between chewing gum or eating hard foods and an increased likelihood of developing osteonecrosis.

Until there is evidence to the contrary, we cannot recommend a curtailment of the dietary intake of patients on oral or intravenous bisphosphonates. This is of particular importance in cancer patients, who already may have a decreased appetite.1 Subsequent removal of caloriedense foods, such as nuts and other hard perishables, would be detrimental to the progression of their treatment.

Because osteonecrosis’ etiology lies in wound healing rather than infection, we do not believe that the prophylactic use of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse would be beneficial to the asymptomatic patient population taking bisphosphonates.

Chlorhexidine’s efficacy in reducing surface bacterial colonization is well-documented. Its use in patients with the condition is directed toward reduction of surface bacterial colonization, in the hope of preventing infection that would compound the problem. However, a modulatory role for chlorhexidine in what is essentially an endogenous process has not been reported. Furthermore, chlorhexidine rinses are relatively expensive and not without adverse effects.2 Therefore, the prophylactic use of chlorhexidine in this patient population seems unwarranted at this time.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
  1. von Meyenfeldt M. Cancer-associated malnutrition: an introduction. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005;9(supplement 2):S35–8.

  2. Tredwin CJ, Scully C, Bagan-Sebastian JV. Drug-induced disorders of teeth. J Dent Res 2005;84:596–602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Michael R. Markiewicz, BS, Third-Year Predoctoral Student

University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markiewicz, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Markiewicz, M. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS