JADA Continuing Education
Motivating mothers to prevent caries
Confirming the beneficial effect of counseling
Philip Weinstein, PhD,
Rosamund Harrison, DMD, MS and
Tonya Benton, MA
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a motivational interviewing (MI) counseling visit with traditional health education for mothers of young children at high risk of developing dental caries.
Methods. The authors enrolled 240 infants aged 6 to 18 months and their mothers in the study and randomly assigned them to MI or traditional health education (control) groups. Mothers in the control group received a pamphlet and watched a videotape. Those in the MI group received the pamphlet and watched the videotape, as well as received an MI counseling session and six follow-up telephone calls during the first year. There were no interventions in year 2.
Results. After two years, children in the MI group exhibited significantly less new caries (decayed or filled surfaces) than those in the control group (that is, a protective effect of MI) (odds ratio = 0.35, 95 percent confidence interval = 0.15 to 0.83).
Conclusions. MI is a promising approach that warrants further attention in a variety of dental contexts.
Clinical Implications. The results of this study show that MI has a protective effect with regard to the development of early childhood caries. One reason for this clinical effect is greater compliance with recommended fluoride varnish treatment regimens in families who received MI counseling compared with families who received traditional education.
Key Words: Early childhood caries; motivational interviewing; counseling; behavior
Although a number of noninvasive preventive interventions for young children at risk of developing caries have been developed,1 traditional health education remains the gold standard for delivering the message to encourage parents to subscribe to these preventive interventions. By "traditional health education," we mean advice-giving sessions conducted by professionals and/or the dissemination of information via pamphlets, posters and media campaigns. Unfortunately, such approaches are not effective.2–5
In 2004, we compared a brief counseling approach—motivational interviewing (MI)—with traditional health education in a randomized controlled trial composed of the mothers of infants aged 6 to 18 months. One-year data were encouraging and are presented elsewhere.6 After one year, children in the MI group had, on average, 0.71 new carious lesions (standard deviation [SD] = 2.8), compared with 1.9 new carious lesions (SD = 4.8) in children in the health education group.
Without an effective approach to influence positively the behavior of mothers, dental services for high-risk children will remain focused on symptomatic treatments, restorative procedures and extractions. Although our one-year data are valuable, they may not be sufficiently compelling to motivate clinicians to change their long-standing interactions with mothers. The aim of this article is to provide additional evidence of the efficacy of MI with mothers of young children after two years of follow-up.
|
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
|
|---|
The methods and measures used are described in a previous article.6 This project was a joint undertaking of the University of Washington, Seattle, and the University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, in collaboration with the Progressive Intercultural Community Services Society (PICS), a community organization for South Asian immigrants in Surrey, British Columbia. The Behavioural Research Ethics Board of UBC provided approval for the project.
We recruited and enrolled 240 healthy infants aged 6 to 18 months and their mothers from the Punjabi-speaking (South Asian) community in Surrey. Young children of South Asian immigrants are at high risk of developing early childhood caries (ECC).7–10 The only exclusion criterion was a history of a serious acute or chronic disease that would interfere with our ability to examine the child or with the ability of the child and parent to participate fully.
Study design and groups.
We conducted a randomized clinical trial composed of two groups. We assigned subjects to either an MI counseling or a health education (control) group, after stratifying the children into two age groups (6 to 12 months and older than 12 months) for each sex. We used age stratification to account for individual differences in the number of erupted teeth and the time of exposure to cariogenic foods. We used sex stratification to account for any parenting differences that may have affected caries risk.
Control group.
Each mother in the control group received a pamphlet (in Punjabi or English) designed by the staff of the local governmental health unit and also viewed the videotape, "Preventing Tooth Decay for Infants and Toddlers." This 11-minute educational videotape, produced by the Vancouver/Richmond Health Board with the advice of one of us (R.H.), was available in Punjabi or English. The pamphlet and videotape also encouraged mothers to take their children to PICS to have fluoride varnish applied to the children’s teeth.
Experimental group.
Mothers in the experimental group received the same pamphlet and viewed the same videotape, received one 45-minute counseling session (discussion of the protocol is presented elsewhere6) and received two brief follow-up telephone calls within six weeks. To reinforce the behavioral change, mothers in the experimental group received an additional four follow-up telephone calls during the next 20 weeks. Trained laypeople also sent two postcards to the mothers, reminding them about their behavioral change. The table
provides an overview of the MI counseling program.
MI protocol.
One of us (P.W.) trained three local South Asian women as counselors. They received a detailed 15-page protocol. The author reviewed audiotapes of the interventions periodically to ensure that the MI protocol was being delivered consistently. (The entire protocol, consisting of the counseling session and follow-up procedures, is available from the corresponding author.) Box 1 presents sections of the protocol that focus on establishing rapport and the need for behavioral change. Box 2 presents sections that discuss the menu of options for caries-preventive behavior. Box 3 (page 792) is the list of dietary and nondietary menu items that were identified in focus groups of South Asian women.
Measures.
Caries.
We assessed caries during visual examinations using modified Radike criteria.11 One of three calibrated examiners (R.H. and two local dentists) wiped the teeth with cotton gauze and examined them using front-surface mirrors and a dental light. They used explorers primarily to remove plaque and periodically to verify cavitation of the enamel. Children were examined in the "knee-to-knee" position. After the examinations, the clinicians made treatment referrals. They did not administer any treatment themselves and any restorative therapy was completed at the discretion of the parents. (We should point out that standard doses of fluoride varnish were applied at separate visits.)
Behavior.
Each parent completed two interview schedules that were used in previous studies of high-risk children.12–14 We used a modified Evens instrument13 to assess parenting practices, as well as dietary and hygiene practices that affect ECC. We administered these instruments to mothers at the two annual assessments. Results of these measures will be presented elsewhere.
|
RESULTS
|
|---|
As described in our previous report,6 baseline comparisons between the two groups—MI and control (traditional health education)—revealed only differences in the age of subjects. We found no differences in sex, diet, hygiene or frequency of dental visits for varnish applications in the first year. Children in the control group were slightly older when we recruited their mothers into the study (12 months versus 11 months, t(238) = 2.06, two-tailed, P < .04). These age differences remained after two years; children in the control group were slightly older (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 43.1 ± 8.4 months) than their counterparts in the MI group (40.9 ± 7.3 months). The only other group difference after two years was the mean (± SD) number of fluoride varnish applications received. Subjects in the control group received 0.3 ± 0.6 applications compared with 4.1 ± 1.0 applications in the MI group. No other dietary, hygiene or demographic variables were significantly different.
Logistic regression analyses confirmed our previous findings. After two years in the trial, 205 (85 percent) of 240 children were available for follow-up dental examinations. The likelihood of new carious lesions (that is, decayed or filled surfaces) since the start of the study in the MI group was significantly lower than it was in the control group, confirming the protective effect of MI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 to 0.83). At year 2, only 35.2 percent of subjects in the MI group had new carious lesions, compared with 52.0 percent of subjects in the control group (
2 = 5.67, P < .02, two-sided). After controlling for age and number of fluoride varnish visits in year 2, we found that the protective effect of MI after two years had not diminished (OR = 37, CI = 0.76 to 1.76). The figure demonstrates this difference between the groups expressed in caries incidence over time.
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure. Differences in caries incidence between the groups during the length of the study. dfs: Decayed or filled surfaces.
| |
|
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The two-year results of this controlled trial, which is, to our knowledge, the only dental health study using MI counseling, suggest that MI counseling has a positive effect on children’s dental health that is greater than that of traditional health education. The results appear to be clinically meaningful and confirm the findings of a recent meta-analysis of MI counseling trials.15 Because the behavioral recommendations chosen by the mothers varied considerably among subjects in the MI group, we cannot make comparisons of at-home parenting practices (regarding diet and hygiene) between the groups.
Fluoride varnish applications.
The counselors recorded the recommendations of mothers in the MI group with regard to dental visits for fluoride varnish applications. The results of comparisons between the MI and control groups show a higher mean number of fluoride varnish applications in the MI group during the second year of the study. This effect manifested itself even though our protocol did not include follow-up MI visits during year 2. Families in the MI group appeared to value their recommended fluoride varnish visits more than did those who received traditional health education alone, based on the number of visits for varnish application after the counseling follow-up was completed. This finding reflects the goal of MI: to positively influence the preventive behaviors of patients (or their parents).
MI training.
The MI counseling approach used in this study can be learned readily by both lay health care workers and professionals. The counselors in our study mastered the MI techniques after 10 hours of training in a workshop setting. MI is appropriate not only for dental personnel, but also for community workers who frequently staff public health and early childhood programs (for example, Head Start and Women, Infants and Children programs). (The corresponding author has developed materials that facilitate training in MI techniques, and they are available from him.) Although we did not collect cost-effectiveness data, it appears that the study had a meaningful effect on the rate of new caries at a reasonable cost. Our other ongoing studies will assess carefully the cost-effectiveness of this technique.
Our protocol did not include in-person MI counseling sessions in year 2. Our telephone follow-up in year 2 was specifically to remind mothers in both the control and MI groups about impending fluoride varnish appointments, which were available at the local PICS on certain days. We believe that further telephone or in-person follow-up would serve as a booster to reduce the chance of any lapses in parental behavior becoming complete relapses. More intensive follow-up certainly would enhance the effect of the intervention.
|
CONCLUSION
|
|---|
An MI intervention enhanced the preventive behavior of mothers of young children at high risk of developing caries. This approach also may be used to counsel others at high risk of developing dental diseases. MI has proven to be useful in motivating adolescents who are engaging in high-risk behaviors,16,17 and, therefore, it could be used to counsel adolescents who avoid seeking health care or are unwilling to engage in preventive practices.18 Furthermore, MI can be useful for counseling related to periodontal and gingival disorders, which often develop in patients with poor long-term compliance with regard to preventive recommendations.19
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
Dr. Weinstein is a professor, Dental Public Health Sciences, and director, Behavioral Dental Research Program, University of Washington, School of Dentistry, Suite B-509, Box 357475, Seattle, Wash. 98195-7475, e-mail "philw{at}u.washington.edu". Address reprint requests to Dr. Weinstein.
Dr. Harrison is an associate professor and chair, Division of Pediatric Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Ms. Benton is a research coordinator, Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle.
The study described in this article was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grant P60-DE13061.
The authors are grateful for the hard work and dedication of Monika Laul Verma, Iti Chandra and all Progressive Intercultural Community Services Society staff and volunteers from Surrey, British Columbia. They also appreciate the cooperation and enthusiasm of the participating families.
|
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Milgrom P, Weinstein P. Early childhood caries: A team approach to prevention and treatment. Seattle, University of Washington in Seattle, Continuing Dental Education; 1999.
- Johnsen DC. Characteristics and backgrounds of children with ‘nursing caries.’ Pediatr Dent 1982;4:218–24.[Medline]
- Benitez C, O’Sullivan D, Tinanoff F. Effect of a preventive approach for the treatment of nursing bottle caries. ASDC J Dent Child 1994;61(1):46–9.[Medline]
- Tinanoff N, Daley NS, O’Sullivan DM, Douglass JM. Failure of intense preventive efforts to arrest early childhood and rampant caries: three case reports. Pediatr Dent 1999;21:160–3.[Medline]
- Kay EJ, Locker D. Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:231–5.[Medline]
- Weinstein P, Harrison R, Benton T. Motivating mothers to prevent caries in their young children: one-year findings. JADA 2004;135:731–8.
- Williams SA, Fairpo CG, Curzon MEJ. An inquiry into the dental caries experience of pre-school children in an inner city area (abstract 166). J Dent Res 1987;66:853.
- Prendergast MJ, Williams SA, Curzon ME. An assessment of dental caries prevalence among Gujurati, Pakistani and white Caucasian five-year-old children resident in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire. Community Dent Health 1989;6:223–32.[Medline]
- Williams SA, Hargreaves JA. An inquiry into the effects of health related behaviour on dental health among young Asian children resident in a fluoridated city in Canada. Community Dent Health 1990;7:413–20.[Medline]
- Prendergast MJ, Beal JF, Williams SA. The relationship between deprivation, ethnicity and dental health in 5-year-old children in Leeds, UK. Community Dent Health 1997;14:18–21.[Medline]
- Radike A. Criteria for diagnosis of dental caries. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Clinical Testing of Cariostatic Agents; Oct. 14–16, 1968; Chicago: American Dental Association; 1972:87–8.
- Weinstein P, Domoto P, Wohlers K, Koday M. Mexican-American parents with children at risk for baby bottle tooth decay: pilot study at a migrant farmworkers clinic. ASDC J Dent Child 1992;59:376–83.[Medline]
- Evens CC. Snacking patterns as a risk factor for early childhood caries (dissertation). Seattle: University of Washington; 1997.
- Weinstein P, Riedy CA. The reliability and validity of the RAPIDD Scale: readiness assessment of parents concerning infant dental decay. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68(2):129–35.[Medline]
- Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:843–61.[Medline]
- Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, et al. A brief motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. Health Educ Res 1999;14:399–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tober G. Motivational interviewing with young people. In: Miller WR, Rollnick S, eds. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1991:248–59.
- Skaret E, Weinstein P, Kvale G, Raadal M. An intervention program to reduce dental avoidance among adolescents: a pilot study. Eur J Paed Dent 2003;4:191–6.
- Wilson TG Jr. How patient compliance to suggested oral hygiene and maintenance affect periodontal therapy. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:389–403.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
W. E. Mouradian, C. E. Huebner, F. Ramos-Gomez, and H. C. Slavkin
Beyond Access: The Role of Family and Community in Children's Oral Health
J Dent Educ.,
May 1, 2007;
71(5):
619 - 631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
