The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 10, 1314-1322.
© 2007 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

COVER STORY

JADA Continuing Education

Tooth loss, dementia and neuropathology in the Nun Study

Pamela Sparks Stein, DMD, Mark Desrosiers, PhD, Sara Jean Donegan, SSND, DDS, Juan F. Yepes, DDS, MD, MPH and Richard J. Kryscio, PhD


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Background. Numerous studies have linked dementia to the subsequent deterioration of oral health. Few investigators, however, have examined oral disease as a potential risk factor in the development of dementia. The authors conducted a study to investigate a potential association between a history of oral disease and the development of dementia.

Methods. Longitudinal dental records supplemented data collected from 10 annual cognitive assessments of 144 Milwaukee participants in the Nun Study, a longitudinal study of aging and Alzheimer disease, who were 75 to 98 years old. Neuropathologic findings at autopsy were available for 118 participants who died.

Results. A low number of teeth increased the risk of higher prevalence and incidence of dementia.

Conclusion. Participants with the fewest teeth had the highest risk of prevalence and incidence of dementia.

Clinical Implications. Edentulism or very few (one to nine) teeth may be predictors of dementia late in life.

Key Words: Epidemiology; periodontal disease; Alzheimer disease

Abbreviations: apoE4: Apolipoprotein E4 allele.

Many cross-sectional studies1–14 and some longitudinal studies15,16 have shown that patients with dementia are more likely to have poor oral health. Few investigators,17–19 however, have attempted to relate oral disease to the subsequent risk of developing cognitive impairments and dementia. Such an association is biologically plausible.20 Potential mechanisms include inflammatory mediators produced in response to periodontal pathogens,21–28 which produce chronic systemic inflammation and neuropathology; increased risk of stroke and cerebrovascular injury in those with periodontal disease29–34; and dissemination of oral gram-negative bacteria to the brain35–46 via a transient bacteremia. Oral bacteria also may spread to the brain via neuronal pathways. Riviere and colleagues47 suggested that oral bacteria may use branches of the trigeminal nerve to reach the brain. In their postmortem examination of brain tissues, they detected antigens of oral treponemes more often in samples from subjects with Alzheimer disease (14 of 16) than in samples from control subjects (four of 18).

The Nun Study, a longitudinal study of aging and Alzheimer disease, offers a unique model for the study of oral health and cognitive function. Participants in the Nun Study are Roman Catholic sisters who are members of the international congregation of the School Sisters of Notre Dame. At the first examination, conducted from 1991 through 1993, the 678 sisters who agreed to participate in all phases of the study—including annual cognitive assessments and brain donation on death—were 75 to 102 years old (mean age, 83 years). Two hundred of these Nun Study participants were members of the Milwaukee province (region) of the congregation, and 165 had been dental patients of the Milwaukee province dentist (S.J.D.). We limited this study to Nun Study participants in the Milwaukee province because it was the only province that had an on-site dental clinic and a full-time dental staff. The Milwaukee province dentist began practicing in 1964 and has remained the dentist for the sisters since that time. Combining 40 years of longitudinal dental data from a private practice and 12 years of longitudinal findings from annual cognitive assessments with brain autopsies from the Nun Study provides an unparalleled opportunity to study dental health, dementia and neuropathology.

Dementia is a complex and multifactorial disease, and it is unlikely that any one mechanism is completely causal. However, specific risk factors have been identified that increase the probability for developing Alzheimer disease. In 1993, a polymorphism in the apolipoprotein E4 allele (apoE4) was discovered to be a major risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease.48 This gene promotes the deposition of beta-amyloid protein in the brain, contributing to the formation of senile plaques. People who have inherited a single E4 allele of apolipoprotein (APOE) experience a twofold to fivefold increase in risk of developing Alzheimer disease.49

We investigated the relationships between tooth loss, dementia and neuropathology in participants in the Nun Study, a study that already has yielded much data on dementia and neuropathology.50–58


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study population. Of the 165 Nun Study participants who were patients of the Milwaukee province dentist (S.J.D.), 148 were patients before and after they participated in the first cognitive assessment in the Nun Study. For two of those patients, there were no data on the presence or absence of apoE4. Two additional patients who were found to have dementia at the first examination had a history of psychiatric conditions dating back to early adult life. Elimination of these four patients resulted in a final sample of 144 Nun Study participants.

Characteristics of our sample of 144 participants were similar to those of the total Nun Study population of 678 sisters. The 144 participants in this study were 75 to 98 years old (mean age, 84 years) at their first cognitive examination. This differs only slightly from the entire population of 678 participants, who ranged in age from 75 to 102 years. Eighty-five percent of the participants in our subset had attained at least a bachelor’s degree, 88 percent had been teachers most of their lives, and 22 percent had one or more copies of the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease, the apoE4 allele. Of the other Nun Study participants not included in our sample, 84 percent had attained at least a bachelor’s degree, 90 percent had been teachers most of their lives, and 23 percent had one or more copies of apoE4.

Nun Study participants live in one of seven provinces throughout the United States. These provinces are located in rural areas such as Chatawa, Miss., Wilton, Conn., and Mankato, Minn, and urban areas such as Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore and Milwaukee, the province from which we obtained our subset. Although these sisters live in different areas throughout the United States, their living conditions, diet and medical care are similar.

Oral and dental health. Information contained in the dental records included clinical notes made by the Milwaukee province dentist (S.J.D.) regarding treatment, as well as the charting of missing, carious and restored teeth. In most cases, the records contained radiographs. Documented or written information regarding the periodontal status of the patients (probing depths, clinical attachment level, percentage of sites with bleeding at probing and periodontal diagnoses) was not available in the patients’ records. Another dentist (P.S.S.) reviewed each participant’s dental record, documenting the number of teeth observed and lost across time during the participant’s tenure as a patient. She recorded the date and reason for each extraction. Reasons included periodontal disease, caries, breakage, periapical disease, pain, failed restoration and multiple causes.

Using these longitudinal data, we determined the number of non–third molars for the date of the first cognitive examination. The primary consideration in categorizing the number of non–third molars present was to create groups of at least 10 participants at the extremes of the continuum of the number of teeth present. A group with one to nine non–third molars was at one end of that continuum. (We kept the edentulous separate from this group because they did not have active periodontal disease or other dental diseases.) At the other end of the continuum, we created a group with 17 to 28 non–third molars. We created a middle category with 10 to 16 non–third molars.

Medical history assessment. Most of the dental records contained medical histories. A dentist (P.S.S.) reviewed the medical histories, documenting for each subject the presence or history of any medical conditions known to be associated with an inflammatory process. Five physicians collaborated to create the list of inflammatory conditions, which included allergies, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, cardiovascular disease, Crohn disease, eczema, lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, rosacea, temporal arteritis and ulcerative colitis.

Radiographic examination. We used full-mouth radiographs obtained before the first cognitive examination to assess alveolar bone loss and damage to periodontal tissues. One of the authors (J.F.Y.) performed all radiographic examinations under ideal conditions (in a dark-room using a magnifier and a viewing box). The same independent observer, who had experience in radiograph interpretation, measured the marginal bone level by means of a calibrated rule.

We based the radiographic measurements on alveolar bone loss from the cementoenamel junction. We classified the degree of periodontal damage of the participants by using methodology and criteria previously described by Jansson and colleagues.59 We classified participants who had 4 to 6 millimeters of alveolar bone loss in 33 percent or more of their teeth as having moderate periodontal damage and those with more than 6 mm of alveolar bone loss in 33 percent or more of their teeth as having severe periodontal damage. Because of the low number of participants classified as having severe periodontal damage (1.3 percent), we combined the moderate and severe categories.

Cognitive function and dementia. Two field-trained gerontologists assessed the participants’ cognitive function annually by a battery of tests. These tests evaluated memory, concentration, language, visuospatial ability, and orientation to time and place.60 The gerontologists assessed social and daily physical functions by means of performance-based testing.61,62 Participants classified as having intact (high) cognitive function had normal global cognitive and physical function (as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and Activities of Daily Living), as well as scores within normal limits on tests of memory, language and visuospatial ability (as measured by scores on the Delayed Word Recall Test,60 the Boston Naming Test,60,63 the verbal fluency test and constructional praxis test60) (as described by Riley and colleagues55). Participants considered to have dementia according to Nun Study criteria had each of the following conditions:

– impairment in memory;
– impairment in at least one other area of cognition, such as language or visuospatial ability;
– impairment in social or daily function, such as inability to use a phone or handle money.55

apoE genotyping. Two scientists performed genotyping by using genetic material from buccal cells collected from living participants by a field-trained gerontologist or from frozen or paraffin-embedded brain specimens obtained at autopsy by the neuropathologist for the Nun Study according to a protocol already described.64,65 On the basis of the six standard apoE genotypes (2/2, 2/3, 2/4, 3/3, 3/4, 4/4), we used a binary variable coded as presence or absence of any E4 allele.

Neuropathology. A neuropathologist who was blinded to the participants’ cognitive test scores performed standard gross and microscopic evaluations of the participants’ brains (n = 118) according to previously described protocol.56 He identified brain infarcts by examining the intact brain and 1.5-centimeter–thick coronal sections of the cerebral hemispheres, brain stem and cerebellum. He classified infarcts visible to the naked eye as either lacunar (< 1.5 cm) or large (> 1.5 cm) (a classification described by Snowdon and colleagues50). He determined the severity of Alzheimer disease neuropathology using the staging method of Braak and Braak.66 Braak stage 0 includes cases without any entorhinal or hippocampal neurofibrillary tangles or only extremely rare transentorhinal tangles; stages I and II indicate neurofibrillary disease in the entorhinal cortex; stages III and IV involve increasing neurofibrillary disease in the entorhinal cortex and in other medial temporal lobe structures, including the hippocampus and the amygdala; and stages V and VI involve additional neurofibrillary disease in the neocortex.66,67

Statistical methods. We used logistic regression to analyze prevalence data and derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs). The main independent variable was the number of non–third molars. We coded categories of teeth as 0 for the edentulous group, 1 for those with one to nine teeth, 2 for those with 10 to 16 teeth, and 3 for those with 17 to 28 teeth. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazards ratios for incidence data.68 We coded the following covariates as binary variables: college education, presence of apoE4, brain infarct identified at autopsy, presence of moderate-to-severe damage to periodontal tissues and presence of any medical inflammatory condition. All correlations were Spearman rank correlations. A test for trend was based on the Cochran-Armitage statistic for the percentage who lost a tooth owing to periodontitis as well as on a test for linearity in a one-way analysis of variance for the mean number of teeth lost due to periodontitis. We used two-tailed P values in all analyses. The statistical package we used was SAS/STAT (Version 9, SAS System for Windows, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). The {alpha} level of significance for our analysis was .05.

Approximately one-third of the participants with no teeth or very few teeth (one to nine) had dementia at the first cognitive examination.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the subset of 144 participants in our study, the first cognitive examinations took place between October 1991 and October 1992.

The number of non–third molars teeth present had a strong inverse association with past tooth loss due to periodontal disease as determined by clinician’s notes (Table 1Go). The number of non–third molars also was inversely correlated with age (r = –0.41; P < .0001) and positively associated with attained education ({chi}2 = 24.3; P < .0001), but was not associated with the presence of apoE4 ({chi}2 = 2.7; P = .44).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1 The relationship of number of non–third molars at the last dental visit to past tooth loss due to periodontal disease as determined by clinician’s notes.*

 
Approximately one-third of the participants with no teeth or very few teeth (one to nine) had dementia at the first cognitive examination (Table 2Go). In those with 10 or more teeth, the percentage with dementia was 17 percent or less. Adjusting for age and education, we found that the number of non–third molars present was not significantly associated with dementia prevalence at the first cognitive assessment in the total population of all participants. We tested for effect sizes and found a significant interaction between the number of teeth and apoE4 (P = .04)—that is, the allele was a statistically significant modifier of the association between tooth loss and dementia prevalence. The interactions between number of teeth and age or education were not statistically significant. Table 2Go shows the prevalance of dementia in the total population of participants (n = 144) and two subsets, one with apoE4 (n = 32) and one without (n = 112). In the 112 participants without apoE4, a low number of teeth (one to nine) was significantly associated with dementia prevalence after we adjusted for age and education. A combined category (zero to nine), comprising the edentulous and group with a low number of teeth (one to nine), also was significantly associated with dementia prevalence (OR = 4.3, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = [1.16–15.60], P = .03).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2 Prevalence of dementia at the first examination, by number of non–third molars.

 
Medical histories were available for 133 participants. Sixty had one or more medical conditions associated with documented inflammatory disease. Adding the risk factor of inflammatory disease did not alter the significance of the association between those with one to nine teeth and the prevalence of dementia in the subset of the population without apoE4, but in fact increased the OR (OR = 8.2, 95 percent CI = [1.34–49.80] P = .02). The categories of the number of teeth were not associated with the presence of one or more inflammatory conditions ({chi}2 = 1.5; P = .67).

Full-mouth radiographs obtained before the first cognitive examination were available for 76 participants. All participants had some alveolar bone loss; 68 percent had slight periodontal damage, 30 percent had moderate periodontal damage, and 1 percent had severe periodontal damage. There was a significant inverse relationship between the number of teeth and moderate-to-severe periodontal damage as assessed via radiographic examination (r = –0.31, P = .01). Adjusting for age, education and apoE4, we found that moderate-to-severe periodontal damage, as evidenced by alveolar bone loss, was not associated with dementia at the first cognitive examination (OR = 1.5, 95 percent CI = [0.37–5.8]) or incidence of dementia (hazards ratio = 2.4, 95 percent CI = [0.86–6.6). Nor was it related to Alzheimer disease neuropathology ({chi}2 = 1.1, P = .29) or brain infarcts (2 0.21, P = .65).

We based our incidence analysis on the 101 participants who did not have dementia at the first examination and who had undergone at least one additional cognitive examination. We further collapsed the four tooth categories into two categories, a low number of teeth (zero to nine) and a high number of teeth (10 to 28), owing to the similarities of these categories found in the prevalence analysis. Adjusting for age, education and presence of apoE4, we found that presence of a low number of non–third molars (zero to nine) was associated with the incidence of dementia during the subsequent 12 years of observation in the Nun Study (Table 3Go). Only 15 of the 101 participants had apoE4; no one in the zero-to-nine tooth category in this group developed dementia. Thus, we could not test for an interaction between the number of teeth and apoE4 and, therefore, did not create apoE4 subgroups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3 Incidence of dementia after the first cognitive examination, by number of non–third molars.

 
Of the 144 participants in our study, 15 were living and 129 were deceased. Neuropathologic examination results were available for 118 of the deceased participants. In this subset, adjusting for age, education and presence of apoE4, we found no association between the number of teeth and the severity of Alzheimer neuropathology, Braak stage (OR = 1.1, 95 percent CI = [0.49–2.7], P = .75) and no association between number of teeth and brain infarcts (OR = 1.14, 95 percent CI = [0.49–2.66], P = .76).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Only a few studies17–19 have explored a potential link between oral disease and the subsequent risk of developing dementia. Data from two case-control studies suggest that tooth loss may be a significant risk factor for Alzheimer disease.17,19 In our prospective longitudinal study, we found an association between the presence of a low number of teeth and the prevalence and incidence of dementia.

Thirty-two of the 144 participants in our study had dementia at the first cognitive examination in the Nun Study. (Eleven participants did not have more than one cognitive examination.) We do not know how long these sisters had had dementia. They may have had dementia when some of their teeth were extracted, in which case the dentist may have thought it was easier to extract than to restore their teeth. However, we excluded from our incidence analysis the participants who had dementia at the first examination and followed only those participants who did not have dementia at the first examination. Of the participants who did not have dementia at the first examination, those with few teeth (zero to nine) had an increased risk of developing dementia during the study compared with those who had 10 or more teeth. It is interesting that we found this increase in risk only in those without apoE4.

Additionally, in participants without apoE4, a low number of teeth (one to nine) significantly increased the risk of having dementia at the first cognitive examination (OR = 6.4) compared with participants in the reference group, who had 17 to 28 teeth. This increase in odds did not occur in the participants with apoE4. Perhaps apoE4 is such a strong risk factor for Alzheimer disease that it significantly modifies the association between tooth number and dementia.

We assessed damage to alveolar bone from periodontal disease and other conditions of an inflammatory nature to investigate the potential role of inflammation in our findings. Inflammation has been suggested as playing a role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease.69 Chronic "trickling" of periodontal pathogens into the systemic bloodstream may result in a sustained elevation of inflammatory products within the circulation.21 In addition, inflammatory cytokines produced in the periodontal tissues may disseminate into the bloodstream.70–72 The potential role of cytokines in neurological changes relating to psychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer disease, has been highlighted in the literature.73 The presence of interleukin-6, a cytokine significantly elevated in severe periodontal disease,28 has been demonstrated in and around senile plaques.74 This cytokine may regulate the production of beta-amyloid protein found in senile plaques.75 Interleukin-1 (IL-1), another cytokine associated with periodontal disease,76 also has been implicated in Alzheimer pathogenesis.77 Furthermore, several studies have linked polymorphisms (variations) in the IL-1 gene family to periodontal disease78–85 and Alzheimer disease.86–89 Although these polymorphisms are found at different loci, one might consider the possibility that these polymorphisms reflect a hyperinflammatory genotype that could be an underlying trait common to people with periodontal disease and people with dementia.

Although not statistically significant, the adjustment for one or more inflammatory diseases increased the odds of dementia at the first cognitive examination in those with few teeth (one to nine) from OR = 6.4 to OR = 8.2. However, we found no significant association between dementia and a history of periodontal disease, as marked by alveolar bone loss. Moderate-to-severe periodontal damage to the alveolar bone was not a significant predictor of dementia, nor was it related to Alzheimer disease or brain infarcts. Documenting the amount of alveolar bone loss from full-mouth radiographs does not present a comprehensive evaluation of the true periodontal disease burden of the participants. It only provides information about their history of periodontal disease. Full-mouth radiographs were not available for all participants; the final radiographic sample included 76 participants. Limitations of radiographic analysis have been described previously90 and include variability of technique including angulation and patient positioning, variations in opacity and contrast, differences in film speed and processing and masking of alveolar bone by other anatomical structures. Periodontal data, therefore, must be interpreted with caution. Further studies are necessary for a more comprehensive investigation of the potential role of periodontal disease in the association between tooth loss and dementia.

Besides periodontal disease, there are other possible explanations for the observed association between number of teeth and dementia in our study. Because the brain is undergoing final maturation in childhood, adolescence and even young adulthood, oral diseases in early life might be particularly damaging to the brain. One must consider the cumulative burden of all oral infections throughout the participant’s lifetime, both odontogenic and periodontal. Alternatively, the association may be due to some unmeasured or unobserved confounding factor. For example, tooth loss could be marking early life stressors and low socioeconomic status, which may have played a role in development of dementia in late life. Nutritional deficiencies, infections or chronic diseases in early life may result simultaneously in tooth loss and damage to the brain.

Although unmeasured confounding is a potential limitation of any observational study, our unique study population minimized many confounding factors. Our sample was composed of a relatively highly educated population of primarily teachers, living in similar housing, who did not smoke, who did not drink heavily, and who had the same marital and reproductive history, similar medical and nursing care, and dental care from the same dentist for an average of 21 years.


   CONCLUSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
 
Regardless of the issues of confounding and biological mechanisms, our findings suggest that a low number of teeth has an association with dementia late in life. However, one should not ascribe causality on the basis of the findings of this investigation. It is not clear from our findings whether the association is causal or casual. Further studies are necessary to determine the true nature of the association between tooth loss and dementia.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Dr. Stein is assistant professor, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, MN 210 Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky. 40536, e-mail "pam.stein{at}uky.edu". Address reprint requests to Dr. Stein.


Dr. Desrosiers is a scientist III, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington.


Dr. Donegan is a professor, Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee.


Dr. Yepes is an assistant professor, Department of Oral Health Practice, Division of Oral Diagnosis, Medicine and Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Dentistry and Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington.


Dr. Kryscio is the director, Biostatistics and Data Management, Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging; the chair, Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health; and a professor, Department of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington.


This study was funded by grants R01AG09862, K04AG00553 and 1P30AG028383 from the U.S. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Md., and grants from the Abercrombie Foundation, Versailles, Ky., and The Robert J. Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation, San Antonio. Additional funding was provided by grant K30HL04163 and grant P20 RR020145 from the National Center for Research Resources, Bethesda, Md., a component of the National Institutes of Health.


This study would not have been possible without the generous and enthusiastic support of the members and leaders of the School Sisters of Notre Dame congregation, their health care providers and particularly the dental staff at the Milwaukee convent. The authors thank the Nun Study personnel for providing the data for this study and for their assistance in this project.


More information about the Nun Study may be obtained at "www.nunstudy.org".


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Chalmers JM, Carter KD, Spencer AJ. Oral diseases and conditions in community-living older adults with and without dementia. Spec Care Dentist 2003;23(1):7–17.[Medline]

  2. Chalmers JM, Hodge C, Fuss JM, Spencer AJ, Carter KD. The prevalence and experience of oral diseases in Adelaide nursing home residents. Aust Dent J 2002;47(2):123–30.[Medline]

  3. Chapman PJ, Shaw RM. Normative dental treatment needs of Alzheimer patients. Aust Dent J 1991;36(2):141–4.[Medline]

  4. Ghezzi EM, Ship JA. Dementia and oral health. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89(1):2–5.[Medline]

  5. Gordon SR. Survey of dental need among veterans with severe cognitive impairment. Gerodontics 1988;4(4):158–9.[Medline]

  6. Gordon SR, McLain D. Dental needs related to primary cause for institutionalization. Spec Care Dentist 1991;11(2):49–54.[Medline]

  7. Horn VJ, Hodge WC, Treuer JP. Dental condition and weight loss in institutionalized demented patients. Spec Care Dentist 1994;14(3): 108–11.[Medline]

  8. Jette AM, Feldman HA, Douglass C. Oral disease and physical disability in community-dwelling older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41(10):1102–8.[Medline]

  9. Loesche WJ, Abrams J, Terpenning MS, et al. Dental findings in geriatric populations with diverse medical backgrounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80(1):43–54.[Medline]

  10. Nordenram G, Ryd-Kjellen E, Johansson G, Nordstrom G, Winblad B. Alzheimer’s disease, oral function and nutritional status. Gerodontology 1996;13(1):9–16.[Medline]

  11. Ship JA. Oral health of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. JADA 1992;123(1):53–8.[Abstract]

  12. Weyant RJ, Pandav RS, Plowman JL, Ganguli M. Medical and cognitive correlates of denture wearing in older community-dwelling adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(4):596–600.[Medline]

  13. Whittle JG, Sarll DW, Grant AA, Worthington HV. The dental health of the elderly mentally ill: a preliminary report. Br Dent J 1987;162(10):381–3.[Medline]

  14. Warren JJ, Chalmers JM, Levy SM, Blanco VL, Ettinger RL. Oral health of persons with and without dementia attending a geriatric clinic. Spec Care Dentist 1997;17(2):47–53.[Medline]

  15. Jones JA, Lavallee N, Alman J, Sinclair C, Garcia RI. Caries incidence in patients with dementia. Gerodontology 1993;10(2):76–82.[Medline]

  16. Ship JA, Puckett SA. Longitudinal study on oral health in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42(1):57–63.[Medline]

  17. Kondo K, Niino M, Shido K. A case-control study of Alzheimer’s disease in Japan: significance of life-styles. Dementia 1994;5(6): 314–26.[Medline]

  18. Shimazaki Y, Soh I, Saito T, et al. Influence of dentition status on physical disability, mental impairment, and mortality in institutionalized elderly people. J Dent Res 2001;80(1):340–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Gatz M, Mortimer JA, Fratiglioni L, et al. Potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia in identical twins. Alzheimer Dement 2006;2:110–17.

  20. Stein P, Scheff S, Dawson DR. Alzheimer’s disease and periodontal disease: mechanisms underlying a potential bidirectional relationship. Grand Rounds Oral Systemic Med 2006;1:14–24.

  21. Loos BG. Systemic markers of inflammation in periodontitis. J Periodontol 2005;76(11 supplement):2106–15.[Medline]

  22. Ebersole JL. Systemic humoral immune responses in periodontal disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1990;1(4):283–331.[Free Full Text]

  23. Beck JD, Offenbacher S. Relationships among clinical measures of periodontal disease and their associations with systemic markers. Ann Periodontol 2002;7(1):79–89.[Medline]

  24. Ebersole JL, Machen RL, Steffen MJ, Willmann DE. Systemic acute-phase reactants, C-reactive protein and haptoglobin, in adult periodontitis. Clin Exp Immunol 1997;107(2):347–52.[Medline]

  25. Loos BG, Craandijk J, Hoek FJ, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, van der Velden U. Elevation of systemic markers related to cardiovascular diseases in the peripheral blood of periodontitis patients. J Periodontol 2000;71(10):1528–34.[Medline]

  26. Noack B, Genco RJ, Trevisan M, Grossi S, Zambon JJ, De Nardin E. Periodontal infections contribute to elevated systemic C-reactive protein level. J Periodontol 2001;72(9):1221–7.[Medline]

  27. Slade GD, Offenbacher S, Beck JD, Heiss G, Pankow JS. Acute-phase inflammatory response to periodontal disease in the US population. J Dent Res 2000;79(1):49–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Bretz WA, Weyant RJ, Corby PM, et al. Systemic inflammatory markers, periodontal diseases, and periodontal infections in an elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(9):1532–7.[Medline]

  29. Beck J, Garcia R, Heiss G, Vokonas PS, Offenbacher S. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. J Periodontol 1996;67(10 supplement):1123–37.[Medline]

  30. Elter JR, Offenbacher S, Toole JF, Beck JD. Relationship of periodontal disease and edentulism to stroke/TIA. J Dent Res 2003;82(12): 998–1001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Grau AJ, Becher H, Ziegler CM, et al. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Stroke 2004;35(2):496–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Grau AJ, Buggle F, Ziegler C, et al. Association between acute cerebrovascular ischemia and chronic and recurrent infection. Stroke 1997;28(9):1724–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Loesche WJ, Schork A, Terpenning MS, Chen YM, Kerr C, Dominguez BL. The relationship between dental disease and cerebral vascular accident in elderly United States veterans. Ann Periodontol 1998;3(1):161–74.[Medline]

  34. Joshipura KJ, Hung HC, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Ascherio A. Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and incidence of ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34(1):47–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Andersen WC, Horton HL. Parietal lobe abscess after routine periodontal recall therapy: report of a case. J Periodontol 1990;61(4): 243–7.[Medline]

  36. Andrews M, Farnham S. Brain abscess secondary to dental infection. Gen Dent 1990;38(3):224–5.[Medline]

  37. Brill CB, Pearlstein LS, Kaplan M, Mancall EL. CNS infections caused by Eikenella corrodens. Arch Neurol 1982;39(7):431–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Emmerson AM, Mills F. Recurrent meningitis and brain abscess caused by Eikenella corrodens. Postgrad Med J 1978;54(631):343–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Gallagher DM, Erickson K, Hollin SA. Fatal brain abscess following periodontal therapy: a case report. Mt Sinai J Med 1981;48(2): 158–60.[Medline]

  40. Goteiner D, Sonis ST, Fasciano R. Cavernous sinus thrombosis and brain abscess initiated and maintained by periodontally involved teeth. J Oral Med 1982;37(3):80–3.[Medline]

  41. Kuijper EJ, Wiggerts HO, Jonker GJ, Schaal KP, de Gans J. Disseminated actinomycosis due to Actinomyces meyeri and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Scand J Infect Dis 1992;24(5):667–72.[Medline]

  42. Marks PV, Patel KS, Mee EW. Multiple brain abscesses secondary to dental caries and severe periodontal disease. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;26(3):244–7.[Medline]

  43. Martin BF, Derby BM, Budzilovich GN, Ransohoff J. Brain abscess due to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Neurology 1967;17(9):833–7.[Free Full Text]

  44. Renton TF, Danks J, Rosenfeld JV. Cerebral abscess complicating dental treatment: case report and review of the literature. Aust Dent J 1996;41(1):12–5.[Medline]

  45. Saal CJ, Mason JC, Cheuk SL, Hill MK. Brain abscess from chronic odontogenic cause: report of case. JADA 1988;117(3): 453–5.[Abstract]

  46. Zijlstra EE, Swart GR, Godfroy FJ, Degener JE. Pericarditis, pneumonia and brain abscess due to a combined Actinomyces—Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans infection. J Infect 1992;25(1):83–7.[Medline]

  47. Riviere GR, Riviere KH, Smith KS. Molecular and immunological evidence of oral Treponema in the human brain and their association with Alzheimer’s disease. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2002;17(2):113–8.[Medline]

  48. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 1993;261(5123):921–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  49. Rosenberg RN, Prusiner SB, DiMauro S, Barchi RL, Nestler EF. The molecular and genetic basis of neurologic and psychiatric disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Butterworth Heinemann; 2003: 337.

  50. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease: the Nun Study. JAMA 1997;277(10):813–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Snowdon DA, Kemper SJ, Mortimer JA, Greiner LH, Wekstein DR, Markesbery WR. Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer’s disease in late life: findings from the Nun Study. JAMA 1996;275(7):528–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  52. Riley KP, Snowdon DA, Desrosiers MF, Markesbery WR. Early life linguistic ability, late life cognitive function, and neuropathology: findings from the Nun Study. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26(3):341–7.[Medline]

  53. Mortimer JA, Gosche KM, Riley KP, Markesbery WR, Snowdon DA. Delayed recall, hippocampal volume and Alzheimer neuropathology: findings from the Nun Study. Neurology 2004;62(3): 428–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  54. Snowdon DA; Nun Study. Healthy aging and dementia: findings from the Nun Study. Ann Intern Med 2003;139(5 pt 2):450–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  55. Riley KP, Snowdon DA, Markesbery WR. Alzheimer’s neurofibrillary pathology and the spectrum of cognitive function: findings from the Nun Study. Ann Neurol 2002;51(5):567–77.[Medline]

  56. Wolf DS, Gearing M, Snowdon DA, Mori H, Markesbery WR, Mirra SS. Progression of regional neuropathology in Alzheimer disease and normal elderly: findings from the Nun study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;13(4):226–31.[Medline]

  57. Snowdon D, Greiner LH, Riley KP, Markesbery W, Greiner PA, Mortimer JA. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. JAMA 1997;278(2):113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  58. Snowdon DA. Aging and Alzheimer’s disease: lessons from the Nun Study. Gerontologist 1997;37(2):150–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  59. Jansson H, Lindholm E, Lindh C, Groop L, Bratthall G. Type 2 diabetes and risk for periodontal disease: a role for dental health awareness. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33(6):408–14.[Medline]

  60. Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD), part I: clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol 1989;39(9):1159–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Potvin AR, Tourtellotte WW, Dailey JS, et al. Simulated activities of daily living examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53(10): 476–86.[Medline]

  62. Kruiansky J, Gurland B. The performance test of activities of daily living. Int J Aging Hum Dev 1976;7(4):343–52.[Medline]

  63. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189–98.[Medline]

  64. Mayeux R, Saunders AM, Shea S, et al. Utility of the apolipoprotein E genotype in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Disease Centers Consortium on Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med 1998;338(8):506–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  65. Saunders AM, Hulette O, Welsh-Bohmer KA, et al. Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value of apolipoprotein-E genotyping for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1996;348(9020):90–3.[Medline]

  66. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1991;82(4):239–59.[Medline]

  67. Ohm TG, Muller H, Braak H, Bohl J. Close-meshed prevalence rates of different stages as a tool to uncover the rate of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neuroscience 1995;64(1):209–17.[Medline]

  68. Allison PD. Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute; 1995.

  69. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, et al. Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2000;21(3):383–421.[Medline]

  70. Amar S, Han X. The impact of periodontal infection on systemic diseases. Med Sci Monit 2003;9(12):RA291–9.[Medline]

  71. Offenbacher S. Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis. Ann Periodontol 1996;1(1):821–78.[Medline]

  72. Page RC. The pathobiology of periodontal diseases may affect systemic diseases: inversion of a paradigm. Ann Periodontol 1998;3(1): 108–20.[Medline]

  73. Kronfol Z, Remick DG. Cytokines and the brain: implications for clinical psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(5):683–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  74. Strauss S, Bauer J, Ganter U, Jonas U, Berger M, Volk B. Detection of interleukin-6 and alpha 2-macroglobulin immunoreactivity in cortex and hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Lab Invest 1992;66(2):223–30.[Medline]

  75. Cox G, Gauldie J. Interleukin-6. In: Remick D, Friedland J, eds. Cytokines in health and disease. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997: 81–99.

  76. Ebersole JL, Cappelli D. Acute-phase reactants in infections and inflammatory diseases. Periodontol 2000 2000;23:19–49.

  77. Sheng JG, Ito K, Skinner RD, et al. In vivo and in vitro evidence supporting a role for the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 as a driving force in Alzheimer pathogenesis. Neurobiol Aging 1996;17(5): 761–6.[Medline]

  78. Moreira PR, de Sa AR, Xavier GM, et al. A functional interleukin-1 beta gene polymorphism is associated with chronic periodontitis in a sample of Brazilian individuals. J Periodontal Res 2005;40(4): 306–11.[Medline]

  79. Cullinan MP, Westerman B, Hamlet SM, et al. A longitudinal study of interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms and periodontal disease in a general adult population. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28(12):1137–44.[Medline]

  80. McDevitt MJ, Wang HY, Knobelman C, et al. Interleukin-1 genetic association with periodontitis in clinical practice. J Periodontol 2000;71(2):156–63.[Medline]

  81. Meisel P, Schwahn C, Gesch D, Bernhardt O, John U, Kocher T. Dose-effect relation of smoking and the interleukin-1 gene polymorphism in periodontal disease. J Periodontol 2004;75(2):236–42.[Medline]

  82. Meisel P, Siegemund A, Grimm R, et al. The interleukin-1 polymorphism, smoking, and the risk of periodontal disease in the population-based SHIP study. J Dent Res 2003;82(3):189–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  83. Parkhill JM, Hennig BJ, Chapple IL, Heasman PA, Taylor JJ. Association of interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms with early-onset periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27(9):682–9.[Medline]

  84. Engebretson SP, Lamster IB, Herrera-Abreu M, et al. The influence of interleukin gene polymorphism on expression of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in periodontal tissue and gingival crevicular fluid. J Periodontol 1999;70(6):567–73.[Medline]

  85. Pociot F, Molvig J, Wogensen L, Worsaae H, Nerup J. A TaqI polymorphism in the human interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) gene correlates with IL-1 beta secretion in vitro. Eur J Clin Invest 1992;22(6): 396–402.[Medline]

  86. Grimaldi LM, Casadei VM, Ferri C, et al. Association of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease with an interleukin-1alpha gene polymorphism. Ann Neurol 2000;47(3):361–5.[Medline]

  87. Rebeck GW. Confirmation of the genetic association of interleukin-1A with early onset sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 2000;293(1):75–7.[Medline]

  88. Yucesoy B, Peila R, White LR, et al. Association of interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms with dementia in a community-based sample: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Neurobiol Aging 2006;27(2):211–7.[Medline]

  89. Mrak RE, Griffin WS. Interleukin-1, neuroinflammation, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2001;22(6):903–8.[Medline]

  90. Sanz M, Newman MG, Quiryhem M. Advanced diagnostic techniques. In: Takei H, Newman MG, Klokkevold P, Carranza F, eds. Clinical periodontology. 10th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 585.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. Marshall, M. E. Northridge, L. D. De La Cruz, R. D. Vaughan, J. O'Neil-Dunne, and I. B. Lamster
ElderSmile: A Comprehensive Approach to Improving Oral Health for Seniors
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 99(4): 595 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
I. L. Shapira
The Nun Study
J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2008; 139(2): 130 - 131.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS