The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 11, 1420.
© 2007 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reader, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reader, A.

LETTERS

Author’s response

We want to thank Dr. Gladstein for his interest in our article. We agree that effective testing of articaine and lidocaine at varying concentrations and quantities would provide very useful information regarding efficacy in buccal infiltration of mandibular teeth. We chose to use commercially available concentrations and amounts of articaine and lidocaine as an initial first step in evaluating mandibular buccal infiltrations. Further studies using varying concentrations are warranted.



Al Reader, DDS, MS, Professor and Program Director
Advanced Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University Columbus



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reader, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reader, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS