The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 4, 440-441.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, M.

LETTERS

Authors’ response

A thank-you to Dr. Moses for stressing the need for further clarification of the clinical application of the results accounted for in our article.

The results should not be interpreted as suggesting that every craniofacial pain patient should undergo an electrocardiogram (ECG). If the source of pain can be clearly identified (for example, dental or ear, nose and throat pathology) and diagnosed, clinical management should be directed toward curing the pathology.

If cardiac ischemia is suspected, the patient should be examined primarily with an ECG. At suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the patient should be sent to the hospital for emergency care.

The clinician should be alert and consider cardiac ischemia or AMI when there is no obvious local source of the craniofacial pain, particularly when one or more of the following is the case:

– The pain is triggered by physical stress (for example, walking up stairs), is of short duration and is spontaneously alleviated by rest. Cardiac ischemia should be considered.
The pain is persistent. AMI should be suspected.
– The pain has a bilateral presentation. The projected pain of dental origin seldom crosses the midline.
– The patient is female. Craniofacial pain as the sole symptom of cardiac ischemia or AMI was nearly 10 times more common in females than in males.

Furthermore, females are more likely to present with atypical ECG registrations.

We have just finished a study in which the character of craniofacial pain, which was induced by cardiac ischemia or AMI, is compared with the character of referred dental pain felt in the same regions. The results are aimed at further helping the clinician to determine the origin of craniofacial pain.

Another clinical implication is information to the public. In some countries, the public is well aware that chest pain and pain in the left arm are typical of cardiac ischemia. This implies a risk that a patient with only craniofacial pain will not seek emergency care, because the absence of chest pain and left arm pain in their mind means there is no cardiac problem.



Annika Isberg, DDS, PhD, Professor

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden

Marcelo Kreiner, DDS, Chair

Department of General and Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS