|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 5, 553-563.
© 2008 American Dental Association |
CLINICAL PRACTICE |
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Types of Studies Reviewed. The authors reviewed selected clinical investigations and previous reviews associated with chewing gum containing substances such as calcium, bicarbonate, carbamide, chlorhexidine, fluoride and xylitol and their effects on reducing caries. They searched the MEDLINE database by using the key words "dental caries," "oral health," "calcium," "bicarbonate," "carbamide," "chlorhexidine," "fluoride" and "xylitol."
Results. Chewing gum is being used as a delivery vehicle for substances such as calcium, bicarbonate, carbamide, chlorhexidine, fluoride and xylitol to improve oral health and reduce caries. These substances exhibit properties that are protective of the oral environment and mediate common oral diseases. The debate for advocating xylitol use in caries prevention is advancing; however, chewing gum use by young schoolchildren in the United States is hindered by choking hazard concerns and lack of specific xylitol dosing recommendations.
Clinical Implications. The use of chewing gum containing dental-protective substances, particularly xylitol, in caries-prevention programs can reduce the tooth decay epidemic. Chewing gum use by children in the school setting should be reconsidered.
Key Words: Chewing gum; public health; oral health; caries; polyols; xylitol
Abbreviations:
DMFS: Change in decayed, missing and filled surfaces. CHX: Chlorhexidine. CPP-ACP: Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. defs: Decayed, extracted and filled surfaces. DMFS: Decayed, missing and filled surfaces. FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. x/s: Xylitol-sorbitol.
Chewing gum commonly is thought of as being part of the American culture, and it was popularized in Europe during World War II when it was included in U.S. Army rations.1 While the first U.S. patent for a chewing gum was issued in 1869 to Dr. W.F. Semple,2 the chewing of nonfood items and gummy substances for pleasure can be traced back to ancient Greek culture and later throughout the Middle East, as well as among Mayan Indians in the early centuries A.D.1 Today, chewing gum is a worldwide multibillion-dollar industry, with more than one-half million tons used annually.2 The United States leads the world in consumption at 2.5 kilograms per capita, with annual expenditures of more than $.5 billion.1
Chewing gum typically consists of a sweetener, gum base, flavoring and an aromatic agent. Historically, chewing gum was sweetened with sucrose (table sugar) and contributed to tooth decay. Today, more than 50 percent of chewing gums are sweetened with sugar substitutes such as polyol sweeteners, artificial sweeteners or both. Study results have shown that oral bacteria do not use these sugar substitutes to produce acids that demineralize enamel and dentin,2 so they are accepted as noncariogenic by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Furthermore, the act of gum chewing is a potent stimulator of saliva flow, which increases buffering capacity and enhances clearance of food debris and microorganisms from the oral cavity.
Chewing gums have been studied and used as delivery vehicles for a host of dental substances such as calcium, bicarbonate, carbamide, chlorhexidine (CHX), fluoride and polyol sweeteners, as well as medicinal substances such as nicotine, methadone, aspirin, motion sickness antihistamine agents, antifungal agents, caffeine and vitamins. Chewing polyol-sweetened gum, particularly xylitol-containing gum, alone or in combination with other dental-protective substances in oral health and caries-prevention programs for high-risk populations may facilitate reaching the U.S. national oral health goals.
In this article, we provide an overview of chewing gum as a delivery vehicle for dental-protective agents and its potential application in oral health and caries-prevention programs for children. We highlight chewing gum containing xylitol, a polyol sweetener that reduces plaque, salivary Streptococcus mutans levels and tooth decay, as well as promotes remineralization.
The use of chewing gum to deliver minerals such as calcium and phosphate into the oral cavity also has been explored since the 1960s. The results of studies of the use of various forms of calcium phosphates in chewing gums showed enhanced acid-buffering capacity and decreased demineralization.7,8 Chewing gum containing xylitol and calcium lactate showed enhanced remineralization of enamel surfaces cut from an extracted tooth and placed in a retainer in situ when compared with chewing gum containing only xylitol and with no gum.9 In another in situ study, Cai and colleagues10 showed that use of chewing gum containing citric acid and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) resulted in significantly greater remineralization than did chewing gum containing no CPP-ACP or citric acid or chewing gum containing citric acid alone. Neither of these studies, however, was a formal randomized clinical trial involving patients in normal conditions.
Bicarbonate has been used to alkalinize saliva and plaque effectively.11,12 Igarashi and colleagues13 showed that including a combination of sodium bicarbonate and sorbitol in chewing gum enhanced the chewing gums ability to increase and maintain plaque pH after a fermentable carbohydrate challenge in volunteers in a laboratory. Other researchers using various forms of market-available bicarbonate-containing chewing gum reported increases in salivary pH and reduction of dental plaque and gingivitis.14–16 These results are important for patients with dry mouth.
The antiseptic agent CHX has been used in mouthrinses to treat gingivitis and periodontitis and as a short-term substitute for mechanical brushing. Chewing gums containing CHX minimize undesirable characteristics such as staining and bitter taste, while maintaining an effectiveness similar to that of CHX mouthrinses.2 Ainamo and colleagues17 showed that chewing two pieces of gum containing 5 milligrams of CHX twice a day while not using any other oral hygiene measures for five days was as effective in inhibiting plaque growth as was rinsing with CHX (0.2 percent) twice a day. Other investigators found similar results.18,19 In a study of elderly people who chewed gum that contained a combination of CHX and xylitol, researchers found a significant reduction in S. mutans and lactobacilli levels.20 Although the CHX 0.2 percent mouthrinse is available in many countries, only 0.12 percent CHX rinse has been approved by the FDA for use in the United States.
Dental-protective and medicinal chewing gums are available in the United States (Table 1
![]()
THE EFFECTS OF GUM CHEWING ON ORAL HEALTH
TOP
ABSTRACT
THE EFFECTS OF GUM...
CHEWING GUM CONTAINING FLUORIDE,...
POLYOL-SWEETENED CHEWING GUM AND...
XYLITOL IN FOCUS
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF GUM...
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Common claims for the effects of gum chewing include cleansing food debris from teeth and plaque, stimulating salivary flow, increasing the pH of saliva and plaque, and reducing gingivitis and periodontitis. In a critical literature review of gum chewings effects and applications, Imfeld2 found that gum chewing is a potent stimulator of salivary flow, which is a function of the mechanical act of mastication. Gum chewing after meals stimulates salivary flow that has an increased concentration of bicarbonate, which results in elevated plaque pH and enhanced acid-buffering capacity. The stimulated saliva is also in a state of mineral supersaturation that promotes enamel remineralization; this effect is lost, however, when sucrose-based chewing gum is chewed. Sucrose-free chewing gums (that is, sugar-free chewing gums containing appropriate amounts of dental-protective substances alone or in combination) may be used in preventive health programs to improve oral health. Imfeld2 found little evidence that chewing gum reduces gingivitis or is effective in removing plaque, particularly in interproximal areas and in the gingival one-third of the crown.
![]()
CHEWING GUM CONTAINING FLUORIDE, MINERALS, ALKALINIZING AGENTS AND CHLORHEXIDINE
TOP
ABSTRACT
THE EFFECTS OF GUM...
CHEWING GUM CONTAINING FLUORIDE,...
POLYOL-SWEETENED CHEWING GUM AND...
XYLITOL IN FOCUS
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF GUM...
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Fluoride-containing chewing gum was introduced in the early 1960s as an alternative to fluoride tablets for high-risk populations that were not served by fluoridated water systems or fluoridated salt distribution plans. Fluoride-containing chewing gum has more than 80 percent oral bioavailability,3 reduces demineralization and enhances remineralization of enamel.4–6 Fluoride-containing chewing gum, however, is not available in the United States, although it is elsewhere in the world.
). Product labeling, however, often is insufficient, leaving it unclear whether oral health products contain adequate amounts of the dental-protective substances to be effective. This lack of clarity is further compounded by the lack of guidelines for dose, frequency of consumption and length of use of these dental-protective chewing gums for clinical effectiveness. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to address questions of clinically effective dose, frequency of consumption and length of use.
|
| POLYOL-SWEETENED CHEWING GUM AND TOOTH DECAY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| XYLITOL IN FOCUS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S. mutans does not readily metabolize xylitol into energy; however, xylitol is absorbed and accumulated intracellularly. Xylitol competes with sucrose for its cell-wall transporter and its intracellular metabolic processes.42 Unlike the metabolism of sucrose, for which net energy is produced and S. mutans growth is promoted, the metabolic process for xylitol does not yield energy but instead creates a net energy loss. This loss has been referred to as the "futile cycle."43,44 Furthermore, the energy-producing intermediates are consumed and not reproduced during xylitol metabolism.42 The end result is S. mutans cellular death and, thus, a reduction in S. mutans levels. In addition to reducing S. mutans levels, long-term habitual consumption of xylitol appears to have a selective effect on S. mutans strains,45 which results in the selection for S. mutans strains that are able to use xylitol but are less virulent.46 This effect may explain why xylitol influences the transmission of S. mutans from mothers to their children and why these children experience less dental decay.
Investigators have evaluated the effectiveness of xylitol in caries reduction. The results of the Turku sugar studies of the early 1970s showed that subjects who replaced fructose and sucrose in their diets with xylitol had an 85 percent reduction in caries.23 In a 40-month trial evaluating xylitol-containing gum chewing and dental caries conducted in Belize, 1,277 children in the fourth grade (mean age, 10.2 years) were assigned randomly to one of nine groups: four 100 percent xylitol groups of varying dose (4.3–9.0 g/day) and frequency of daily use (three or five times per day), two xylitol-sorbitol (x/s) groups (8.0–9.7 g/day), one sorbitol-only group (9.0 g/day), one sucrose-only group and a no-gum (control) group.31 All study chewing gums were chewed during school hours under supervision. The results showed that chewing 100 percent xylitol-containing pellet chewing gum resulted in the highest caries reduction (relative risk [RR] = 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.20–0.36; P = .0001) when compared with results in the control group. Groups that consumed a higher xylitol dose had greater caries reduction than did groups that consumed a lower dose. Use of x/s mixed chewing gum led to less, but still significant, caries reduction. Use of pellet chewing gums led to higher caries reductions than did use of stick chewing gums. The sucrose gum group fared worse than did the control group (adjusted change in decayed, missing and filled surfaces [
DMFS] of 6.6 versus 4.9, respectively; adjusted RR of 1.20 [95 percent CI = 0.96–1.49]).
The adjusted
DMFS and RR for other groups compared with the control group were as follows: high-dose xylitol-containing pellet chewing gum (
DMFS of –0.8; RR of 0.27 [95 percent CI = 0.20–0.36]); low-dose xylitol-containing pellet chewing gum (
DMFS of 0.9; RR of 0.41 [95 percent CI = 0.31–0.54]), high-dose xylitol-containing stick chewing gum (
DMFS of 0.6; RR of 0.44 [95 percent CI = 0.34–0.56]) and low-dose xylitol-containing stick chewing gum (
DMFS of 0.1; RR of 0.48 [95 percent CI = 0.37–0.61]). The two x/s mixed groups had
DMFSs of 0.6 and 2.2, and RRs of 0.49 (95 percent CI = 0.38–0.65) and 0.56 (95 percent CI = 0.44–0.71).
Results from other studies, particularly those in which similar xylitol doses and frequencies of consumption were used, support these findings (Table 3
).23–39 Overall, results from these studies suggest that the amount of xylitol in chewing gums or confections and the frequency of use determine the degree of reduction observed; greater reduction was seen with higher xylitol dose and frequency of use.21 There appears to be a plateau effect with higher dosages.
After conducting a six-month, four-group, randomized trial of xylitol-containing chewing gum to assess salivary and plaque S. mutans responses to increasing xylitol dose (3.4–10.3 g/day), Milgrom and colleagues25 reported a significant reduction in plaque S. mutans levels after five weeks and six months of exposure compared with results from the control group that used sorbitol-containing chewing gum. The results also suggested a plateau effect between 6.9 and 10.3 g/day. Furthermore, the group that received a xylitol dose of 3.4 g/day did not show a significant reduction, although a small reduction was observed.
Another randomized trial in the same series of studies evaluated the response of S. mutans to varying frequencies (zero, two, three and four) of xylitol-containing chewing gum consumption at a standard daily dose of 10.3 g/day. The results showed a linear increase in S. mutans reduction with increasing frequency of xylitol consumption, but a dosing frequency of less than three times per day seemed to have limited or no benefit.26 There is some agreement in the literature that a xylitol dose of 5 to 10 g/day divided into at least three frequencies of consumption are needed for therapeutic effects.
Study results also have shown that xylitol can reduce or delay acquisition of S. mutans and reduce caries in young children whose mothers chewed xylitol-containing gum in the perinatal period. In a two-year study, Söderling and colleagues47 recruited mother-infant pairs and assigned them to one of three groups: xylitol-containing chewing gum (n = 106), CHX varnish (n = 30) or fluoride varnish (n = 33). Mothers received varnish treatments at six, 12 and 18 months after delivery or were asked to chew xylitol-containing chewing gum at least two or three times a day beginning at three months after delivery. The children did not receive any treatment. At two years of age, only 9.7 percent of children whose mothers were in the xylitol-containing chewing gum group had detectable mutans streptococci, compared with 28.6 percent and 48.5 percent in the CHX and fluoride groups, respectively.
In a similar one-year study, mothers with high levels of mutans streptococci were randomized into one of three groups: xylitol-containing (n = 61), CHX/xylitol-containing (n = 55) or fluoride-containing (n = 57) chewing gum.48 The reference group (n = 232) included mothers with low or medium mutans streptococci counts; they received no intervention. The mothers began using the chewing gum at six months postpartum. Thorild and colleagues48 found 10 percent of 18-month-old children of mothers in the xylitol-containing chewing gum group harbored mutans streptococci compared with 16 percent and 28 percent in the CHX/xylitol-containing chewing gum and fluoride-containing chewing gum groups, respectively. In the reference group, 10 percent of the children had detectable mutans streptococci. When the children were followed up until 3 years of age, researchers found that 13 percent of the children with mothers in the xylitol-containing chewing gum group had medium to high counts of salivary mutans streptococci and a decayed, extracted and filled surfaces (defs) mean of 0.1 compared with 16 percent of children with mothers in the CHX/xylitol-containing chewing gum group who had a mean defs of 0.2 and 22 percent of the children with mothers in the fluoride-containing chewing gum group who had a mean defs of 0.4.49 The reference group results were between the xylitol and CHX/xylitol groups. When the children were 4 years of age and 15 to 20 percent in the treatment groups had dropped out, the authors found that the mean defs was 0.4 ± 1.0 (standard deviation [SD]) for the xylitol-containing chewing gum group, 0.7 ± 1.7 SD for the CHX/ xylitol-containing chewing gum group and 1.4 ± 3.0 SD for the fluoride-containing chewing gum group. The difference between the xylitol and fluoride groups was statistically significant.50
| POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF GUM CHEWING FOR CHILDREN AT HIGH RISK OF EXPERIENCING CARIES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the popularity of chewing gum in the United States, the use of dental-protective consumer products such as xylitol-containing and CHX-containing chewing gum may be a desirable adjunct to other practices. CHX chewing gum is available in Europe but not in the United States. Xylitol-containing chewing gum is readily available in the United States and is well-accepted by school-aged children.51 However, a major limitation in extending the benefits of chewing xylitol-containing and CHX-containing chewing gum to children in the United States is that chewing gum is not considered to be a safe practice for small children by the American Academy of Pediatrics because it presents a choking risk,52 and it is discouraged in day care and schools by teachers and school officials.
In a study examining the acceptance of a xylitol-containing chewing gum regimen by preschoolers and teachers in a Head Start program, Autio and colleagues51 found that children readily accepted the xylitol-containing chewing gum, but teachers acceptance rates were low because of concern for classroom disruption and indiscriminate disposal of the chewing gum. Studies of xylitol-containing chewing gum in school settings have not reported these issues as problematic, and children could be taught proper disposal of used gum.
Most of the other xylitol-containing products that have been studied were in the form of mints or hard candies such as lozenges, and they are at least as effective as xylitol-containing chewing gum.53,54 However, there are concerns in the United States that using such products may create confusion for children and further promote consumption of sugar-sweetened candies. At the University of Washington, researchers produced and field-tested xylitol-containing popsicles, gum-drops, puddings, macaroons and sorbet.55 They found that children will accept these foods readily when they are offered as part of the daily diet and that children experience no adverse effects from their use.
Considerable work is required to produce commercially viable products that will be accepted and to convince manufacturers to produce them. Furthermore, each new xylitol-containing snack food needs to be tested to establish its effectiveness at preventing decay because certain foods are better than others at delivering and releasing xylitol in the oral cavity.
The most apt delivery vehicle for dental-protective agents appears to be chewing gum, and it has been used successfully in oral health and caries-prevention campaigns and programs. Xylitol-containing chewing gum consumption was promoted widely as part of Finlands Smart Habits xylitol campaign, which was geared toward young teenagers with the aim of improving oral health and reducing dental caries. This approach makes sense because children with high levels of plaque harbor much higher levels of S. mutans than do adults. After the campaigns initiation in 1992, the use of xylitol-containing chewing gum by teenagers continued to increase.56 In a study in which xylitol-containing chewing gum was used in day-care centers, Kovari and colleagues38 found that collecting used chewing gum from children was not problematic.
Xylitol-containing chewing gum has been promoted actively for its caries-preventive effects. The U.S. Army has implemented its Look for Xylitol First campaign and includes xylitol-containing chewing gum in rations with the aim of preventing tooth decay among deployed troops who often do not brush their teeth for days at a time and consequently have extremely poor oral hygiene.57 Perhaps, soldiers will again popularize a new type of chewing gum—xylitol-containing chewing gum—or perhaps they will bring xylitol-containing gum to the forefront of thinking about preventive oral health in the United States, particularly for use among young children in whom dental caries is increasing.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |