The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 140, No suppl_1, 17S-24S.
© 2009 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slavkin, H. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slavkin, H. C.

ARTICLES

Science Is the Fuel for the Engine of Technology and Clinical Practice



Malcolm L. Snead, DDS, PhD and Harold C. Slavkin, DDS


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Background. The biological, chemical, behavioral and physical sciences provide the fuel for innovation, discovery and technology that continuously improves the quality of the human condition. Computer power derived from the dramatic breakthroughs of the digital revolution has made extraordinary computational capacity available for diagnostic imaging, bioinformatics (the science of information) and numerous aspects of how we practice dentistry in the 21st century.

Overview. The biological revolution was initiated by the identification of the structure for DNA in 1953, a discovery that continues to catalyze improvements in patient care through new and better diagnostics, treatments and biomaterials. Humanity’s most basic and recognizable characteristics—including the face—are now better understood through the elucidation of our genome and proteome, the genes and proteins they encode. Health care providers are beginning to use personalized medicine that is based on a person’s genetic makeup and predispositions to disease development.

Conclusions. Advances in the fields of genetics, developmental and stem cell biology, and many other disciplines continue to fuel innovative research findings that form the basis for new diagnostic tests, therapeutic interventions and procedures that improve the quality of life for patients. Scientists are on the threshold of applying knowledge in stem cell biology to regenerative medicine and dentistry, heralding an era when clinicians can consider using biological engineering to replace tissues and organs lost to disease or trauma.

Key Words: Discovery; molecular biology; chairside application

Abbreviations: BMP: Bone morphogenetic protein • NIDCR: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research • 3-D: Three-dimensional • UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles

Science is the fuel for the engine of technology and clinical practice. How do we formulate a diagnosis and prognosis? What are the ways of treating the diseases and disorders that challenge the human condition? Is one outcome better than another? The answers to these questions come from our sustained investment in the science that fuels our educational system. Bright minds exposed to questions such as these have created and will continue to create technology that improves patient care.

We think of the Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries as the intellectual and technological movement that shaped the modern world. Yet, today we live in another time of scientific revolution, characterized by great speed and enormous accomplishment in the chemical, physical and biological realms of inquiry—from discovery to application. In the 20th century, scientists identified the structure and function of DNA and applied it to cellular and molecular biology to better understand the microbial and human ecosystems and their interdependence.14

The scientific disciplines in the 21st century are being shaped by the merging of biology, genetics, engineering and computational sciences to create discoveries at the interfaces of these disciplines. When combined with the key ingredient of well-trained clinicians, this merger has resulted in remarkable strides in our understanding of disease and allows for more rapid advances, particularly at the molecular level. Even more so than in the past, dentistry will rely on science to create new diagnostic tests and therapies to improve patient care.510 Optimizing care for patients must be our goal.

In this all-too-brief review, we highlight a few select examples of discoveries, drawn from the last 50 to 60 years, to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the American Dental Association (ADA). Readers should appreciate that this review is but a small sampler of the incredible scientific advances that have shaped what we know, how we think and how we practice clinical dentistry in the dawn of the 21st century. We have attempted to do this by focusing on specific themes and ideas to highlight prominent scientific discoveries and attainment of knowledge that have had an impact on patient care. Science knows no geopolitical boundaries and we recognize the profound contributions of scientists working in other countries. However, because this supplement commemorates the 150th anniversary of the ADA, we have concentrated on the scientific contributions of scientists who have worked in the United States.


   LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND GENETICS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The engine of science has contributed to significant advances by mapping and deciphering the nucleotide letters of the human genome and by describing the proteome, the information that comprises all the genes and their encoded proteins that make us human. This has resulted in remarkably precise diagnostic tests and rapid improvements in patient treatment. One of the most extraordinary scientific discoveries of the 20th century was elucidating the structure and possible functions of DNA (see illustration11). Significantly, it was a dentist, Norman Simmons, who first isolated sufficiently pure DNA in 1952 (see photograph12); Rosalind Franklin then created the first x-ray crystallography images from that DNA. These images led James Watson, Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins to predict the structure of DNA in 1953.1 In Wilkins’ acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962, he credited Norman Simmons for "having refined techniques of isolating DNA and thereby helping a great many workers, including ourselves."13

Norman Simmons received a bachelor’s degree in science in 1935 from the City College of New York, New York City; a Doctor of Dental Medicine degree in 1939 from Harvard, Boston; and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in 1950 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. His doctoral thesis was titled "Investigation of Submaxillary Mucoid and the Defense Mechanisms of the Mouth."14

Simmons was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1972 in recognition of his fundamental studies of changes in light absorption associated with conformational changes within proteins and polypeptides: the so-called "Cotton effects" (named after Aimé Cotton). These studies led him to explore the structure of viral particles.15 Thereafter, his fundamental scientific work in nuclear medicine and oral biology at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), as well as his studies of the isolation of tobacco mosaic virus DNA and RNA, served as the foundation that led to the development of numerous nucleic acid and polypeptide biomarkers for disease diagnostics.

Robert Gorlin earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia University, New York City, and a dental degree in 1947 from Washington University School of Dentistry, St. Louis. He then made the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, his home base for the second half of the 20th century. Gorlin was widely known for his ability to deftly integrate his encyclopedic knowledge of craniofacial birth defects with clinical observation, phenotypic traits and specific genotypes. One of Gorlin’s contributions was the ability to discriminate between syndromic and nonsyndromic birth defects. His memory of craniofacial anomalies was almost as extraordinary as was his clinical prowess; both dentists and physicians consulted him for his diagnostic expertise. Gorlin’s diagnostic skills became known internationally through his lectures, book chapters, books and peer-reviewed publications.16 From esoteric to mainstream diseases and disorders, he was considered an expert in diagnosing craniofacial-oral-dental birth defects. The key to his success was his ability to see, to understand and to integrate an array of seemingly disparate information: he saw the system of the body when others saw only derangements of its parts. Gorlin became one of the leading geneticists in the world and was the recipient of numerous awards, including the Award for Excellence in Human Genetics Education from the American Society for Human Genetics.17

By the end of the 20th century, researchers had begun to identify the specific role of genes in various oral diseases; this was, in no small measure, the result of the remarkable sensitivity and specificity derived from molecular biology for applications to clinical dentistry. For example, we have learned that Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by periodontal disease and palmoplantar keratosis and diagnosed mainly by dentists, is caused by a mutation in the cathepsin C gene.18,19

Another scientific discovery was the isolation, characterization and clinical application of the major gene for enamel formation: amelogenin. The collaboration of an interdisciplinary team from Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, enabled the first dental gene to be cloned.20 Isolation of this gene to the X and Y chromosomes21 provided a forensic tool to discriminate the corporal remains of males versus females and provided the basis for advancing our understanding of the Mendelian inheritance of enamel birth defects.22

Another major advance in dental genetics was the discovery that a gene on chromosome 4 generates three gene products: dentin phosphoprotein, dentin sialoprotein and dentin glycoprotein.23,24 The molecular cloning and mapping of the gene for ameloblastin, the second most abundant enamel-forming protein, also was accomplished.25 Furthermore, investigators have linked the human genome and proteome at the level of teeth, extending our understanding of normal and abnormal formation of the dentin and enamel tissues.26

Another use of genetic science is somatic cell gene therapy to treat human disease. Researchers at the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) are moving genes from the laboratory to chairside to treat salivary gland diseases.27 It also may be possible to transfer genes to readily accessible salivary glands and use them as "biofactories" or as a source of proteins to treat diseases caused by deficient protein biosynthesis. As dentists, we appreciate that the mouth is readily accessible and that its tissues may provide a relatively easy route for introducing genes to prevent or treat a variety of oral and other diseases. The future holds great promise that researchers will identify the genetic basis of many diseases so that clinicians can provide specific preventive care and treatment to patients through somatic cell gene transfer therapy.


   PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR AND STEM CELLS: EXAMPLES OF SCIENCE DRIVING CLINICAL PRACTICE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
We have come a long way since osteoblasts first appeared in primitive bony fish (the ostracoderms). During this evolution, a bony armor formed around the head, leaving cavities for the organs of sight, smell and hearing and, of course, the brain. Eventually, 22 bones evolved to articulate and form the craniofacial-oral-dental complex. Bone has an essential role in supporting the teeth during mastication, but age, disease, trauma and birth defects all serve to remove bone. Today, our clinical challenge is to devise a strategy to generate bone to correct birth defects or to replace bone lost as a result of injury or disease.

In the 1960s, researchers observed that histiocytes were transformed into osteocytes by autoinduction, a process in which explanted bone induced new bone formation, often with hematopoietic bone marrow.28,29 Huggins30 showed the capacity of the urinary bladder to induce new bone formation when it came into contact with abdominal muscle cells, and Reddi and Huggins31 described the biochemical sequences in the transformation of normal fibroblasts into bone cells. The extractable protein that induced new bone was termed "bone morphogenetic protein" (BMP),32 and researchers used recombinant DNA technology to identify a complementary DNA clone for one of the BMPs, which allowed the new technology to produce therapeutic amounts of the protein.33 The commercial availability of BMPs helped us understand how they work so that we can harness their healing powers. Overall, this research allowed this otherwise scarce protein to be manufactured in the laboratory for use at chairside and bedside.34,35

Efforts to examine the ability of dentin to induce bone led researchers to identify a small-molecular-weight protein isolated from dentin that induced naive cells to form cartilage and bone. Rather than a newly discovered BMP, the isolated protein is a small amelogenin protein that researchers previously thought was involved only in enamel matrix formation.3638

The recovery of enamel matrix proteins, mainly amelogenin protein, led to the production of a commercial gel that can induce progenitor cells to regenerate bone and cementum in the treatment of periodontal disease.39 Clinicians now use enamel matrix proteins and/or BMPs to recruit and direct resident stem cells to regenerate lost tissues such as periodontal ligament, acellular cementum and alveolar bone. The study of enamel matrix proteins, such as amelogenin, is continuing in the hope of discovering how they alter cells and direct their differentiation to form bone and cementum while attenuating the inflammatory response.40,41

Investigators working at NIDCR recovered stem cells from human primary teeth, a site that was not known previously to contain such cells.42 In a large collaborative effort that reflects the intense research needed for progress in this field, researchers used stem cells in pigs to engineer a functioning cell-mediated root replacement, complete with a periodontal ligament.43 Researchers also have shown that periodontal ligament stem cells,44 as well as other sources of stem cells, modulate the immune response, offering hope for patients with autoimmune diseases such as lupus erythematosus that a new therapeutic tool can be developed.45

Scientists are investigating the use of implant-supported distraction osteogenesis that will prove useful for bone regeneration in craniofacial reconstruction.46 They have shown that a unique population of cells with stemlike qualities, known as "the neural crest," responds to signals provided by members of the transforming growth factor family of molecules. The neural crest cells participate in forming the bones of the head and face, as well as contribute to the sutures that permit growth of the skull, while errors in cell signaling can result in developmental birth defects.47,48 Collectively, this research provides insight into the molecular mechanisms that may cause craniofacial anomalies and offers great promise regarding treatment that can improve quality of life for affected patients.49


   DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Previous achievements in science have fueled the creative advances in technology in the 20th century. In 1895, Roentgen accidentally discovered that human bones could be imaged, and that the images could be used for dental or medical diagnostics, resulting in the first opportunity to see inside the body without creating a surgical wound.50 Otto Walkhoff, a dentist, obtained the first radiograph of the jaw just weeks after Roentgen’s discovery.51 A remarkable dentist, C. Edmund Kells used radiography, as well as fitted his dental operatory with electric equipment, compressed air and suction; these items, although improved, are still in use today.5254

After World War II, Robert Ledley, a dentist and graduate of New York University, New York City, who worked at the precursor to the National Institute of Dental Research, revolutionized how we know what we see.55,56 Ledley pioneered computerized tomographic scanning in the early 1950s. He took the scientific discovery of x-rays to a new level of understanding. His inventions, hardware and algorithms for software introduced a three-dimensional (3-D) approach by which x-rays were transmitted through varying tissue densities to capture 2-D and 3-D images of all parts of the human anatomy. This remarkable achievement was the precursor of modern diagnostic imaging used in both dentistry and medicine.


   WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Remarkable scientific advances have been made in tissue repair, wound healing and tissue regeneration owing to, in no small part, the genius of Russell Ross, a dentist who had a distinguished career in pathology. He served for many years as the chair of the Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

Using transmission electron microscopy, a novel animal model of parabiotic mice, radiology and an exquisite knowledge of the early advances in wound immunology and pathology, Ross synthesized the essence of wound healing. In publications dating to the 1960s, he defined the timing, cytology, physiology, immunology and connective-tissue biochemistry of wound healing.57,58 His strategy of using parabiotic mice enabled his team to trace cell origins and cell fate during various stages of wound healing. Simply stated, Ross’ team provided the foundation for our modern understanding of wound healing.

During the early 1970s, Ross and his team proposed that localized injury to the lining of the arterial wall was responsible for the unusual accumulation of smooth muscle cells within the wall of the artery, thereby reducing the lumen of the vessel.59 Ross used interdisciplinary scientific inquiry to study the problem of atherosclerosis. His team discovered a new growth factor called "platelet-derived growth factor" that stimulates proliferation of smooth muscle cells.60,61 Curiously, these accumulated smooth muscle cells contain elaborate secretory vesicles that are filled with several types of collagen, fibronectin, metalloproteinases, proteoglycans and fatty acids that assemble into an abundant extracellular matrix associated with atherosclerosis. Ross62,63 concluded that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. These contributions are examples of how scientific advances in improving the human condition were derived from the passion and creativity of people who began their careers in dentistry.


   TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue destruction was another focus of attention for dental scientists. Their efforts to understand tissue loss associated with periodontal disease led to significant advances in our understanding of enzymatic degradation of collagen, with the work of Fullmer and Gibson64 revealing that collagenase is present in the tissues of the human host. This research had far-reaching consequences for other investigators working to understand the destructive process brought about by inflammation. Investigators identified a new class of metal-containing enzymes, the metalloproteinases, along with their endogenous inhibitory counterparts, that formed a yin and yang for homeostasis. These studies have had an impact in many areas of biomedical sciences, helping us understand such phenomena as cancer cell metastasis and angiogenesis, as well as the degradation of enamel matrix proteins during enamel biomineralization.6567 Knowledge about the destructive effects of inflammation also led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and clinical use of collagenase-inhibiting low-dose doxycycline in the treatment of periodontal disease.68 In addition, studies of the metabolism of the extracellular matrix led to the formulation of an artificial basement membrane, which allowed cells to be maintained in a 3-D architecture that resembled native tissue.69


   SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC FLUID
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Saliva is emerging as an exciting diagnostic tool for dentists and physicians. For example, dental scientists at UCLA are investigating saliva as an aid in the diagnosis of oral cancer.70 Many dentists have provided the foundation for using saliva as a diagnostic fluid. Dating back to at least 1960, Irwin Mandel of the School of Dental and Oral Surgery at Columbia University recognized the potential of saliva as an "informative body fluid."71,72 His passion to understand saliva was infectious and attracted many dental scientists to this field of inquiry. Mandel’s contributions to science opened up opportunities in many areas of biomedical scientific research and clinical practice with regard to the diagnosis of disease or monitoring the progression of disease or treatment by using salivary biomarkers. Mandel asserted that saliva, like blood and urine, provided informative clues about health and disease. His basic work in saliva sampling and analysis provided the framework for many contemporary salivary studies.

In the mid-1960s, dental scientists found that viral particles can be secreted through the salivary glands, thus connecting general health with the oral cavity.73 Later, Oppenheim and colleagues74 identified the molecular basis of the beneficial effects of saliva on the oral cavity by identifying antimicrobial properties of various salivary proteins; others provided the foundation for the use of enamel remineralization to control caries by identifying salivary proteins that modulate the maintenance of salivary calcium and phosphorous.75,76 Other investigators77,78 have been instrumental in characterizing the salivary proteome (that is, all of the proteins produced by the salivary gland); in doing so, they laid a foundation for the use of saliva as a diagnostic fluid, because it contains not only salivary proteins, but also proteins from other organs that can be used as surrogate markers for a variety of disease states.

While working at the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Michael Levine spawned several important discoveries regarding salivary proteins.79 Levine and his colleagues identified the importance of salivary proteins as part of the framework for bacterial adherence to the teeth via bacterial proteins that interact with specific domains within salivary proteins, forming a molecular fastener similar to Velcro.80 Other dental scientists who began their careers at the University at Buffalo contributed to our understanding of streptococci in the aggregation of human platelets and virulence factors associated with bacterial endocarditis.81,82

Bacterial biofilms are inherently resistant to antimicrobial agents and are associated with many infections, including caries and periodontal disease.83 However, investigators have shown that protective immunity to caries may be achieved by ingestion of Streptococcus mutans, which can induce secretion of salivary immunoglobulin A.84 These findings led other investigators to explore the possibility of producing a human vaccine to streptococci, an organism associated with dental caries, the most common infection of mankind.85,86


   HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Dental science in the 20th century evolved from the crucible of William J. Gies, a biochemist at Columbia University who convinced the Carnegie Foundation to support an analysis of dental science and education in the United States, aligned with the foundation’s previous support of Flexner and Pritchett’s5 analyses for medicine. The Gies report was published in 1926, and it heralded a new age in American dentistry that would have a foundation in the biological, chemical and physical sciences, as found in major academic health science universities.6

In 1948, leaders of the ADA helped establish a dental institute within the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md. The interdisciplinary work of so-called "dental research" blossomed and became the beacon of dental science for the world. The first major scientific achievement of the fledgling dental institute was the use of fluoridation to prevent caries, made possible by H. Trendley Dean (first director of the then National Institute of Dental Research).87 Thereafter, the institute focused on fundamental research in many areas, such as oral microbiology and immunology, human craniofacial-oral-dental genetics, salivary glands and saliva, connective-tissue biochemistry, bone biology, craniofacial biology, microbial genomics and proteomics, oral neoplasia, and biobehavior and pain, as well as international outreach.

One essential mission of NIDCR is making scientific training available for oral health professionals, people who continue to acquire new knowledge and make discoveries and develop applications, thereby shaping what is thought and taught in our profession. Through the years, it has nurtured many scientists and clinicians to improve the health of Americans. The surgeon general’s report on America’s oral health in 2000 marked the new millennium by emphasizing that good general health must include good oral health,88,89 a mission we celebrate on the 150th anniversary of the ADA.


   CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Advances in the fields of genetics, developmental and stem cell biology, and many other disciplines continue to fuel innovative research findings that form the basis for new diagnostic tests, therapeutic interventions and procedures that improve patients’ quality of life. Scientists are on the threshold of applying knowledge in stem cell biology to regenerative medicine and dentistry, enabling clinicians to consider using biological engineering to replace tissues and organs lost to disease or trauma.


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
DNA is a double helix formed by base pairs attached to a sugar phosphate backbone. Reprinted from the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.11

 

Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Dr. Norman Simmons. Reproduced with permission of the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y.12

 

Figure 3
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Dr. Robert Ledley. Courtesy of National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

 


   FOOTNOTES
 

Dr. Snead is a professor, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, School of Dentistry, The University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90033, e-mail "mlsnead{at}usc.edu". Address reprint requests to Dr. Snead.


Dr. Slavkin is a professor, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, School of Dentistry, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles.


Disclosure. Drs. Snead and Slavkin did not report any disclosures.


The authors thank their colleagues for the many stimulating conversations and manuscripts that formed the foundation of this brief review. They apologize for the exclusions required by space considerations. They note the passion that investigators bring to their work, that they share with their colleagues and that they instill in their students. Their traits assure us that the next century will be filled with discoveries and innovation that will improve the care of our patients.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LINKAGE OF DENTISTRY AND...
 PROTEIN DISCOVERY, WOUND...
 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
 WOUND HEALING, TISSUE REPAIR...
 TISSUE-DESTRUCTIVE ENZYMES
 SALIVA AS A DIAGNOSTIC...
 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953;171(4356):737–738.[Medline]

  2. Venter JC, Adams MD, Sutton GG, Kerlavage AR, Smith HO, Hunkapiller M. Shotgun sequencing of the human genome. Science 1998; 280(5369):1540–1542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the human genome (published correction appears in Science 2001;292[5523]:1838). Science 2001;291(5507):1304–1351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Chambers DA. Forty years of DNA. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;758:1–11.[Medline]

  5. Flexner A, Pritchett HS. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York City: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910.

  6. Gies WJ. Dental Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York City: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1926.

  7. Fields MJ. Dental Education at the Crossroads, Challenges and Change. Washington: National Academy Press; 1995.

  8. Harris RR. Dental Science in a New Age: A History of the National Institute of Dental Research. Rockville, Md.: Montrose Press; 1989.

  9. Slavkin HC. Recombinant DNA technology and oral medicine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;758:314–328.[Medline]

  10. Chambers DA, Reid KBM, Cohen RL. The biomedical revolution at forty years. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995;758:441–458.

  11. Genetics home reference: your guide to understanding genetic conditions. The structure of DNA. "www.ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations/dnastructure". Accessed June 30, 2009.

  12. Dental staff meeting. University of Rochester Libraries. "http://hdl.handle.net/1802/3277". Accessed July 13, 2009.

  13. Wilkins MHF. The molecular configuration of nucleic acids. Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1962. "http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2003/DNA50/source/wilkinslecture.pdf". Accessed July 10, 2009.

  14. Simmons NS. Studies on the defense mechanisms of the mucous membranes with particular reference to the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1952;5(5):513–526.[Medline]

  15. Simmons NS, Blout ER. The structure of tobacco mosaic virus and its components: ultraviolet optical rotatory dispersion. Biophys J 1960; 1(1):55–62.[Medline]

  16. Cohen MM Jr. Robert J. Gorlin, 1923–2006: a remembrance. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140(23):2516–2520.[Medline]

  17. Gorlin RJ. 2004 ASHG Award for Excellence in Human Genetics Education: and the band played on ... Am J Hum Genet 2005;76(2):216–218.[Medline]

  18. Toomes C, James J, Wood AJ, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the cathepsin C gene result in periodontal disease and palmoplantar keratosis. Nat Genet 1999;23(4):421–424.[Medline]

  19. Hart TC, Hart PS, Bowden DW, et al. Mutations of the cathepsin C gene are responsible for Papillon-Lefevre syndrome. J Med Genet 1999; 36(12):881–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Snead ML, Zeichner-David M, Chandra T, Robson KJ, Woo SL, Slavkin HC. Construction and identification of mouse amelogenin cDNA clones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;80(23):7254–7258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Lau EC, Mohandas TK, Shapiro LJ, Slavkin HC, Snead ML. Human and mouse amelogenin gene loci are on the sex chromosomes. Genomics 1989;4(2):162–168.[Medline]

  22. Hart S, Hart T, Gibson C, Wright JT. Mutational analysis of X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta in multiple families. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45(1):79–86.[Medline]

  23. MacDougall M, Simmons D, Luan X, Nydegger J, Feng J, Gu TT. Dentin phosphoprotein and dentin sialoprotein are cleavage products expressed from a single transcript coded by a gene on human chromosome 4: dentin phosphoprotein DNA sequence determination. J Biol Chem 1997;272(2):835–842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Yamakoshi Y, Hu JC, Fukae M, Zhang H, Simmer JP. Dentin glycoprotein: the protein in the middle of the dentin sialophosphoprotein chimera. J Biol Chem 2005;280(17):17472–17479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Krebsbach PH, Lee SK, Matsuki Y, Kozak CA, Yamada KM, Yamada Y. Full-length sequence, localization, and chromosomal mapping of ameloblastin: a novel tooth-specific gene. J Biol Chem 1996;271(8): 4431–4435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Hu JC, Yamakoshi Y, Yamakoshi F, Krebsbach PH, Simmer JP. Proteomics and genetics of dental enamel. Cells Tissues Organs 2005; 181(3–4):219–231.[Medline]

  27. Cotrim AP, Mineshiba F, Sugito T, Samuni Y, Baum BJ. Salivary gland gene therapy. Dent Clin North Am 2006;50(2):157–173, vii.[Medline]

  28. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150(698): 893–899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Reddi AH, Huggins CB. Formation of bone marrow in fibroblast-transformation ossicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1975;72(6):2212–2216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Huggins CB. The formation of bone under the influence of epithelium of the urinary tract. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;59:7–19.[Medline]

  31. Reddi AH, Huggins C. Biochemical sequences in the transformation of normal fibroblasts in adolescent rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1972; 69(6):1601–1605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971;50(6):1392–1406.[Free Full Text]

  33. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, et al. Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 1988;242(4885): 1528–1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Franceschi RT. Biological approaches to bone regeneration by gene therapy. J Dent Res 2005;84(12):1093–1103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Nussenbaum B, Krebsbach PH. The role of gene therapy for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006;58(4):577–591.[Medline]

  36. Veis A, Sires B, Clohisy J, Sabsay B, Amar S. Rat incisor dentine contains a factor which alters the phenotypic expression and stimulates chondrogenesis in fibroblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials 1990;11:35–37.[Medline]

  37. Amar S, Sires B, Sabsay B, Clohisy J, Veis A. The isolation and partial characterization of a rat incisor dentin matrix polypeptide with in vitro chondrogenic activity. J Biol Chem 1991;266(13):8609–8618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Nebgen DR, Inoue H, Sabsay B, Wei K, Ho CS, Veis A. Identification of the chondrogenic-inducing activity from bovine dentin (bCIA) as a low-molecular-mass amelogenin polypeptide. J Dent Res 1999;78(9):1484–1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Hammarstrom L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24(9 Pt 2):658–668.[Medline]

  40. Hoang AM, Klebe RJ, Steffensen B, Ryu OH, Simmer JP, Cochran DL. Amelogenin is a cell adhesion protein. J Dent Res 2002;81(7):497–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  41. Gundersen RY, Ruud TE, Jorgensen PF, et al. Systemic administration of enamel matrix derivative to lipopolysaccharide-challenged pigs: effects on the inflammatory response. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008;9(2): 161–169.[Medline]

  42. Miura M, Gronthos S, Zhao M, et al. SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(10): 5807–5812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Fang D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration in swine. PLoS One 2006;1:e79.[Medline]

  44. Wada N, Menicanin D, Shi S, Bartold PM, Gronthos S. Immunomodulatory properties of human periodontal ligament stem cells. J Cell Physiol 2009;219(3):667–676.[Medline]

  45. Sun L, Akiyama K, Zhang H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation reverses multiorgan dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus mice and humans. Stem Cells 2009;27(6):1421–1432.[Medline]

  46. Lypka M, Afshar A, Pham D, Fortman K, Yamashita DD, Yen S. Implant-supported distraction osteogenesis: a technique to advance the deficient maxilla. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20(2):525–527.[Medline]

  47. Chai Y, Maxson RE Jr. Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 2006;235(9):2353–2375.[Medline]

  48. Ishii M, Han J, Yen HY, Sucov HM, Chai Y, Maxson RE Jr. Combined deficiencies of Msx1 and Msx2 cause impaired patterning and survival of the cranial neural crest. Development 2005;132(22):4937–4950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  49. Chung IH, Yamaza T, Zhao H, Choung PH, Shi S, Chai Y. Stem cell property of postmigratory cranial neural crest cells and their utility in alveolar bone regeneration and tooth development. Stem Cells 2009; 27(4):866–877.[Medline]

  50. Glasser O. W.C. Roentgen and the discovery of the Roentgen rays. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(5):1033–1040.[Free Full Text]

  51. Goaz PW, White SC. St. Louis: CV Mosby; Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 1982.

  52. Fields RT Jr, Goaz PW. Notes on the history of dental radiology. Tex Dent J 1995;112(2):15–22.[Medline]

  53. Hubar JS. C. Edmund Kells, Jr., pioneer in the field of dental X-rays. J Hist Dent 2000;48(1):11–15.[Medline]

  54. Langland OE. C. Edmund Kells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34(4):680–689.[Medline]

  55. Ledley RS, Ayers WR. Computerized medical imaging and graphics evolves from computerized tomography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1988;12(1):v–xviii.[Medline]

  56. Ledley RS. Innovation and creativeness in scientific research: my experiences in developing computerized axial tomography. Comput Biol Med 1974;4(2):133–136.[Medline]

  57. Odland G, Ross R. Human wound repair, I: epidermal regeneration. J Cell Biol 1968;39(1):135–151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  58. Ross R, Odland G. Human wound repair, II: inflammatory cells, epithelial-mesenchymal interrelations, and fibrogenesis. J Cell Biol 1968; 39(1):152–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  59. Ross R, Glomset JA. Atherosclerosis and the arterial smooth muscle cell: proliferation of smooth muscle is a key event in the genesis of the lesions of atherosclerosis. Science 1973;180(93):1332–1339.[Free Full Text]

  60. Ross R, Glomset J, Kariya B, Harker L. A platelet-dependent serum factor that stimulates the proliferation of arterial smooth muscle cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1974;71(4):1207–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Ross R, Vogel A. The platelet-derived growth factor. Cell 1978;14(2): 203–210.[Medline]

  62. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340(2):115–126.[Free Full Text]

  63. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 1993;362(6423):801–809.[Medline]

  64. Fullmer HM, Gibson W. Collagenolytic activity in gingivae of man. Nature 1966;209(5024):728–729.[Medline]

  65. Birkedal-Hansen H, Cobb CM, Taylor RE, Fullmer HM. Serum inhibition of gingival collagenase. J Oral Pathol 1974;3(6):284–290.[Medline]

  66. Sabeh F, Ota I, Holmbeck K, et al. Tumor cell traffic through the extracellular matrix is controlled by the membrane-anchored collagenase MT1-MMP. J Cell Biol 2004;167(4):769–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  67. Caterina JJ, Skobe Z, Shi J, et al. Enamelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 20)-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype. J Biol Chem 2002;277(51):49598–49604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  68. Golub LM, Lee HM, Stoner JA, et al. Subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline modulates gingival crevicular fluid biomarkers of periodontitis in postmenopausal osteopenic women. J Periodontol 2008;79(8):1409–1418.[Medline]

  69. Martin GR, Kleinman HK, Terranova VP, Ledbetter S, Hassell JR. The regulation of basement membrane formation and cell-matrix interactions by defined supramolecular complexes. Ciba Found Symp 1984;108: 197–212.[Medline]

  70. Zimmermann BG, Wong DT. Salivary mRNA targets for cancer diagnostics. Oral Oncol 2008;44(5):425–429.[Medline]

  71. Ellison SA, Mashimo PA, Mandel ID. Immunochemical studies of human saliva, I: the demonstration of serum proteins in whole and parotid saliva. J Dent Res 1960;39:892–898.[Free Full Text]

  72. Mandel ID. The diagnostic uses of saliva. J Oral Pathol Med 1990; 19(3):119–125.[Medline]

  73. Madonia JV, Bahn AN, Calandra JC. Salivary excretion of Coxsackie b-1 virus in rabbits. Appl Microbiol 1966;14(3):394–396.[Medline]

  74. Oppenheim FG, Xu T, McMillian FM, et al. Histatins, a novel family of histidine-rich proteins in human parotid secretion: isolation, characterization, primary structure, and fungistatic effects on Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 1988;263(16):7472–7477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  75. Schlesinger DH, Hay DI. Complete covalent structure of statherin, a tyrosine-rich acidic peptide which inhibits calcium phosphate precipitation from human parotid saliva. J Biol Chem 1977;252(5):1689–1695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  76. VanDyke TE, Levine MJ, Herzberg MC, Ellison SA, Hay DI. Isolation of a low molecular weight glycoprotein inhibitor of calcium phosphate precipitation from the extra-parotid saliva of macaque monkeys. Arch Oral Biol 1979;24(2):85–89.[Medline]

  77. Kauffman DL, Bennick A, Blum M, Keller PJ. Basic proline-rich proteins from human parotid saliva: relationships of the covalent structures of ten proteins from a single individual. Biochemistry 1991;30(14): 3351–3356.[Medline]

  78. Wong RS, Hofmann T, Bennick A. The complete primary structure of a proline-rich phosphoprotein from human saliva. J Biol Chem 1979; 254(11):4800–4808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  79. Scannapieco FA. Salivary biochemistry in Buffalo: the legacy of Michael J. Levine. J Dent Res 2003;82(2):76–81.[Free Full Text]

  80. Murray PA, Levine MJ, Tabak LA, Reddy MS. Specificity of salivary-bacterial interactions, II: evidence for a lectin on Streptococcus sanguis with specificity for a NeuAc alpha 2, 3Ga1 beta 1, 3Ga1NAc sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1982;106(2):390–396.[Medline]

  81. Herzberg MC, Gong K, MacFarlane GD, et al. Phenotypic characterization of Streptococcus sanguis virulence factors associated with bacterial endocarditis. Infect Immun 1990;58(2):515–522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  82. Herzberg MC, Brintzenhofe KL, Clawson CC. Aggregation of human platelets and adhesion of Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun 1983;39(3):1457–1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  83. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284(5418): 1318–1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  84. Michalek SM, McGhee JR, Mestecky J, Arnold RR, Bozzo L. Ingestion of Streptococcus mutans induces secretory immunoglobulin A and caries immunity. Science 1976;192(4245):1238–1240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  85. Taubman MA, Nash DA. The scientific and public-health imperative for a vaccine against dental caries. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6(7): 555–563.[Medline]

  86. Smith DJ, Taubman MA, Ebersole JL. Local and systemic antibody response to oral administration of glucosyltransferase antigen complex. Infect Immun 1980;28(2):441–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  87. Dean HT. Fluorine in the control of dental caries. JADA 1956;52(1): 1–8.[Medline]

  88. Evans CA, Kleinman DV. The surgeon general’s report on America’s oral health: opportunities for the dental profession. JADA 2000;131(12): 1721–1728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  89. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; 2000. NIH publication 00-4713.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
B. L. Pihlstrom
Highlights of America's Scientific Contributions to Dentistry: 150 Years and Still Counting
J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2009; 140(suppl_1): 4S - 6S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slavkin, H. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snead, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slavkin, H. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS